Significant Midlatitude Plasma Density Peaks and Dual‐Hemisphere SED During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm

Ercha Aa,Shun‐Rong Zhang,Jiuhou Lei,Fuqing Huang,Philip J. Erickson,Anthea J. Coster,Bingxian Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033360

2024-11-13

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 11, November 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Localized Plasma Density Peak at Middle Latitudes During the April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Yuyan Yang,Libo Liu,Wenbo Li,Yiding Chen,Huijun Le,Ruilong Zhang,Xiukuan Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ja032165

2024-02-21

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 2, February 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
Significant Midlatitude Bubble‐Like Ionospheric Super‐Depletion Structure (BLISS) and Dynamic Variation of Storm‐Enhanced Density Plume During the 23 April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Ercha Aa,Shun‐Rong Zhang,Shasha Zou,Wenbin Wang,Zihan Wang,Xuguang Cai,Philip J. Erickson,Anthea J. Coster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023sw003704

2024-03-10

Space Weather

Abstract:This paper investigates the midlatitude ionospheric disturbances over the American/Atlantic longitude sector during an intense geomagnetic storm on 23 April 2023. The study utilized a combination of ground‐based observations (Global Navigation Satellite System total electron content and ionosonde) along with measurements from multiple satellite missions (GOLD, Swarm, Defense Meteorological Satellite Program, and TIMED/GUVI) to analyze storm‐time electrodynamics and neutral dynamics. We found that the storm main phase was characterized by distinct midlatitude ionospheric density gradient structures as follows: (a) In the European‐Atlantic longitude sector, a significant midlatitude bubble‐like ionospheric super‐depletion structure (BLISS) was observed after sunset. This BLISS appeared as a low‐density channel extending poleward/westward and reached ∼40° geomagnetic latitude, corresponding to an APEX height of ∼5,000 km. (b) Coincident with the BLISS, a dynamic storm‐enhanced density plume rapidly formed and decayed at local afternoon in the North American sector, with the plume intensity being doubled and halved in just a few hours. (c) The simultaneous occurrence of these strong yet opposite midlatitude gradient structures could be mainly attributed to common key drivers of prompt penetration electric fields and subauroral polarization stream electric fields. This shed light on the important role of storm‐time electrodynamic processes in shaping global ionospheric disturbances.

meteorology & atmospheric sciences,geochemistry & geophysics,astronomy & astrophysics
Regional Ionospheric Super Bubble Induced by Significant Upward Plasma Drift During the 1 December 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Wenjie Sun,Guozhu Li,Shun‐Rong Zhang,Lianhuan Hu,Guofeng Dai,Biqiang Zhao,Yuichi Otsuka,Xiukuan Zhao,Haiyong Xie,Yi Li,Baiqi Ning,Libo Liu,Atsuki Shinbori,Michi Nishioka,Septi Perwitasari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja032430

2024-06-20

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 6, June 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
Dynamic Expansion and Merging of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm

Ercha Aa,Yanhong Chen,Bingxian Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224290

IF: 5

2024-11-27

Remote Sensing

Abstract:This study investigates the responses of the equatorial and low-latitude ionosphere in the American–Atlantic longitude sector during the super geomagnetic storm that occurred on 10–11 May 2024. The investigation utilizes multi-instrument datasets, including ground-based observations (GNSS TEC, ionosonde, and Fabry–Perot interferometer) as well as space-borne satellite measurements (GOLD, Swarm, DMSP, and TIMED). Our findings reveal significant day-to-day variations in the storm-time equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA), summarized as follows: (1) During the main phase of the storm, the low- and mid-latitude ionosphere experienced a positive storm, with TEC drastically enhanced by 50–100% within a few hours. The EIA crests exhibited a substantial poleward expansion, reaching as high as ±35° MLAT. This expansion was caused by the enhanced fountain effect driven by penetration electric fields, along with increased ambipolar diffusion due to transient meridional wind surges. (2) During the recovery phase of the storm, the global ionosphere was characterized by a substantial negative storm with a 50–80% depletion in TEC. The EIA crests were notably suppressed and merged into a single equatorial band, which can be attributed to the composition change effect and the influence of disturbance dynamo electric fields. These results illustrate the complex processes of magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere coupling during a superstorm, highlighting the significant impacts of space weather on the global ionosphere.

environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary
East–West Difference in the Ionospheric Response During the Recovery Phase of May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm Over the East Asian

Xu Guo,Biqiang Zhao,Tingting Yu,Honglian Hao,Wenjie Sun,Guojun Wang,Maosheng He,Tian Mao,Guozhu Li,Zhipeng Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033170

2024-09-19

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 9, September 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
Midlatitude Plasma Blob‐like Structures Along With Super Equatorial Plasma Bubbles During the May 2024 Great Geomagnetic Storm

Wenjie Sun,Guozhu Li,Biqiang Zhao,Shun‐Rong Zhang,Yuichi Otsuka,Lianhuan Hu,Guofeng Dai,Xiukuan Zhao,Haiyong Xie,Yi Li,Jianfei Liu,Yu Li,Baiqi Ning,Libo Liu,Atsuki Shinbori,Michi Nishioka,Septi Perwitasari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl111638

IF: 5.2

2024-10-31

Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract:Plasma blob is generally a low‐latitude phenomenon occurring at the poleward edge of equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) during post‐sunset periods. Here we report a case of midlatitude ionospheric plasma blob‐like structures occurring along with super EPBs over East Asia around sunrise during the May 2024 great geomagnetic storm. Interestingly, the blob‐like structures appeared at both the poleward and westward edges of EPBs, reached up to 40°N magnetic latitudes, and migrated westward several thousand kilometers together with the bubble. The total electron content (TEC) inside the blob‐like structures was enhanced by ∼50 TEC units relative to the ambient ionosphere. The blob‐like structure at the EPB poleward edge could be partly linked with field‐aligned plasma accumulation due to poleward development of bubble. For the blob‐like structure at the EPB west side, one possible mechanism is that it was formed and enhanced accompanying the bubble evolution and westward drift.

geosciences, multidisciplinary
Local Time and Hemispheric Asymmetries of Field‐Aligned Currents and Polar Electrojet During May 2024 Superstorm Periods

Hui Wang,Qihang Cheng,Hermann Lühr,Yunfang Zhong,Kedeng Zhang,Hao Xia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033020

2024-11-09

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 11, November 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
The Polarity Oscillations of the Equatorial Electrojet in Response to the Geomagnetic Storm on 1 December 2023

Kedeng Zhang,Hui Wang,Huimin Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja032978

2024-09-29

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 10, October 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
The Solar and Geomagnetic Storms in May 2024: A Flash Data Report

Hisashi Hayakawa,Yusuke Ebihara,Alexander Mishev,Sergey Koldobskiy,Kanya Kusano,Sabrina Bechet,Seiji Yashiro,Kazumasa Iwai,Atsuki Shinbori,Kalevi Mursula,Fusa Miyake,Daikou Shiota,Marcos V. D. Silveira,Robert Stuart,Denny M. Oliveira,Sachiko Akiyama,Kouji Ohnishi,Yoshizumi Miyoshi

2024-07-10

Abstract:In May 2024, the scientific community observed intense solar eruptions that resulted in an extreme geomagnetic storm and auroral extension, highlighting the need to document and quantify these events. This study mainly focuses on their quantification. The source active region (AR 13664) evolved from 113 to 2761 millionths of the solar hemisphere between 4 May and 14 May 2024. AR 13664's magnetic free energy surpassed 1033 erg on 7 May 2024, triggering 12 X-class flares. Multiple interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) came out from this AR, accelerating solar energetic particles toward Earth. At least four ICMEs seemingly piled up to disturb the interplanetary space, according to the satellite data and interplanetary scintillation data. The shock arrival at 17:05 UT on 10 May 2024 significantly compressed the magnetosphere down to ~ 5.04 R_E, and triggered a deep Forbush decrease. GOES satellite data and ground-based neutron monitors confirmed a ground-level enhancement from 2 UT to 10 UT on 11 May 2024. The ICMEs induced extreme geomagnetic storms, peaking at a Dst index of -412 nT at 2 UT on 11 May 2024, marking the sixth-largest storm since 1957. The AE and AL indices showed extreme auroral extensions that located the AE/AL stations into the polar cap. We gathered auroral records at that time and reconstructed the equatorward boundary of the visual auroral oval to 29.8° invariant latitude. We compared naked-eye and camera auroral visibility, providing critical caveats on their difference. We also confirmed global enhancements of storm-enhanced density of the ionosphere.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics,Earth and Planetary Astrophysics,Space Physics
Unveiling key factors in solar eruptions leading to the solar superstorm in 2024 May

Rui Wang,Ying D. Liu,Xiaowei Zhao,Huidong Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452008

2024-12-05

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract:NOAA active region (AR) 13664/8 produced the most intense geomagnetic effects since the Halloween event of 2003. The resulting extreme solar storm is thought to be the consequence of multiple interacting coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Notably, this AR exhibits exceptionally rapid magnetic flux emergence. The eruptions on which we focus all occurred along collisional polarity inversion lines (PILs) through collisional shearing during a three-day period of extraordinarily high flux emergence (∼10 21 Mx h −1). Our key findings reveal how photospheric magnetic configurations in eruption sources influence solar superstorm formation and geomagnetic responses, and link exceptionally strong flux emergence to sequential homologous eruptions: (1) We identified the source regions of seven halo CMEs that were distributed primarily along two distinct PILs. This distribution suggests two groups of homologous CMEs. (2) The variations in the magnetic flux emergence rates in the source regions are correlated with the CME intensities. This might explain the two contrasting cases of complex ejecta that are observed at Earth. (3) Our calculations of the magnetic field gradients around the CME source regions show strong correlations with eruptions. This provides crucial insights into solar eruption mechanisms and enhances our prediction capabilities for future events.

astronomy & astrophysics
The April 2023 SYM-H = -233 nT Geomagnetic Storm: A Classical Event

Rajkumar Hajra,Bruce Tsatnam Tsurutani,Quanming Lu,Richard B. Horne,Gurbax Singh Lakhina,Xu Yang,Pierre Henri,Aimin Du,Xingliang Gao,Rongsheng Wang,San Lu

2024-09-12

Abstract:The 23-24 April 2023 double-peak (SYM-H intensities of -179 and -233 nT) intense geomagnetic storm was caused by interplanetary magnetic field southward component Bs associated with an interplanetary fast-forward shock-preceded sheath (Bs of 25 nT), followed by a magnetic cloud (MC) (Bs of 33 nT), respectively. At the center of the MC, the plasma density exhibited an order of magnitude decrease, leading to a sub-Alfvenic solar wind interval for ~2.1 hr. Ionospheric Joule heating accounted for a significant part (~81%) of the magnetospheric energy dissipation during the storm main phase. Equal amount of Joule heating in the dayside and nightside ionosphere is consistent with the observed intense and global-scale DP2 (disturbance polar) currents during the storm main phase. The sub-Alfvenic solar wind is associated with disappearance of substorms, a sharp decrease in Joule heating dissipation, and reduction in electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave amplitude. The shock/sheath compression of the magnetosphere led to relativistic electron flux losses in the outer radiation belt between L* = 3.5 and 5.5. Relativistic electron flux enhancements were detected in the lower L* < 3.5 region during the storm main and recovery phases. Equatorial ionospheric plasma anomaly structures are found to be modulated by the prompt penetration electric fields. Around the anomaly crests, plasma density at ~470 km altitude and altitude-integrated ionospheric total electron content are found to increase by ~60% and ~80%, with ~33% and ~67% increases in their latitudinal extents compared to their quiet-time values, respectively.

Space Physics,Earth and Planetary Astrophysics,Solar and Stellar Astrophysics,Plasma Physics
Interplanetary Causes and Impacts of the 2024 May Superstorm on the Geosphere: An Overview

Rajkumar Hajra,Bruce Tsatnam Tsurutani,Gurbax Singh Lakhina,Quanming Lu,Aimin Du

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7462

IF: 5.521

2024-10-18

The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract:The recent superstorm of 2024 May 10–11 is the second largest geomagnetic storm in the space age and the only one that has simultaneous interplanetary data (there were no interplanetary data for the 1989 March storm). The May superstorm was characterized by a sudden impulse (SI + ) amplitude of +88 nT, followed by a three-step storm main-phase development, which had a total duration of ∼9 hr. The cause of the first storm main phase with a peak SYM-H intensity of −183 nT was a fast-forward interplanetary shock (magnetosonic Mach number M ms ∼ 7.2) and an interplanetary sheath with a southward interplanetary magnetic field component B s of ∼40 nT. The cause of the second storm's main phase with an SYM-H intensity of −354 nT was a deepening of the sheath B s to ∼43 nT. A magnetosonic wave (M ms ∼ 0.6) compressed the sheath to a high magnetic field strength of ∼71 nT. Intensified B s of ∼48 nT were the cause of the third and most intense storm main phase, with an SYM-H intensity of −518 nT. Three magnetic cloud events with B s fields of ∼25–40 nT occurred in the storm recovery phase, lengthening the recovery to ∼2.8 days. At geosynchronous orbit, ∼76 keV to ∼1.5 MeV electrons exhibited ∼1–3 orders of magnitude flux decreases following the shock/sheath impingement onto the magnetosphere. The cosmic-ray decreases at Dome C, Antarctica (effective vertical cutoff rigidity <0.01 GV) and Oulu, Finland (rigidity ∼0.8 GV) were ∼17% and ∼11%, respectively, relative to quiet-time values. Strong ionospheric current flows resulted in extreme geomagnetically induced currents of ∼30–40 A in the subauroral region. The storm period is characterized by strong polar-region field-aligned currents, with ∼10 times intensification during the main phase and equatorward expansion down to ∼50° geomagnetic (altitude-adjusted) latitude.

astronomy & astrophysics
A Case Study of Ionospheric Storm‐Time Altitudinal Differences at Low Latitudes During the May 2021 Geomagnetic Storm

Jiawei Kuai,Hao Sun,Libo Liu,Jiahao Zhong,Xinan Yue,Kang Wang,Ruilong Zhang,Qiaoling Li,Yuyan Yang,Yihong Jin,Yi Dong,Xin Wan,Jiawen Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja032484

2024-04-27

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 5, May 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
Unveiling Key Factors in the Solar Eruptions Leading to the Solar Superstorm in 2024 May

Rui Wang,Ying D. Liu,Xiaowei Zhao,Huidong Hu

2024-10-02

Abstract:NOAA Active Region (AR) 13664/8 produced the most intense geomagnetic effects since the ``Halloween'' event of 2003. The resulting extreme solar storm is believed to be the consequence of multiple interacting coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Notably, this AR exhibites an exceptionally rapid magnetic flux emergence. The eruptions we are focusing on all occurred along collisional polarity inversion lines (PILs) through ``collisional shearing'' during a three-day period of extraordinarily high flux emergence ($\sim$10$^{21}$ Mx hr$^{-1}$). Our key findings reveal how photospheric magnetic configurations in eruption sources influence solar superstorm formation and geomagnetic responses, and link exceptionally strong flux emergence to sequential homologous eruptions: (1) We identified the source regions of seven halo CMEs, distributed primarily along two distinct PILs, suggesting the presence of two groups of homologous CMEs. (2) The variations in magnetic flux emergence rates at the source regions correlate with CME intensities, potentially explaining the two contrasting cases of complex ejecta observed at Earth. (3) Calculations of magnetic field gradients around CME source regions show strong correlations with eruptions, providing crucial insights into solar eruption mechanisms and enhancing future prediction capabilities.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Super‐Intense Geomagnetic Storm on 10–11 May 2024: Possible Mechanisms and Impacts

S. Tulasi Ram,B. Veenadhari,A. P. Dimri,J. Bulusu,M. Bagiya,S. Gurubaran,N. Parihar,B. Remya,G. Seemala,Rajesh Singh,S. Sripathi,S. V. Singh,G. Vichare

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024sw004126

2024-11-29

Space Weather

Abstract:One of the most intense geomagnetic storms of recent times occurred on 10–11 May 2024. With a peak negative excursion of Sym‐H below −500 nT, this storm is the second largest of the space era. Solar wind energy transferred through radiation and mass coupling affected the entire Geospace. Our study revealed that the dayside magnetopause was compressed below the geostationary orbit (6.6 RE) for continuously ∼6 hr due to strong Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure (SWDP). Tremendous compression pushed the bow‐shock also to below the geostationary orbit for a few minutes. Magnetohydrodynamic models suggest that the magnetopause location could be as low as 3.3RE. We show that a unique combination of high SWDP (≥15 nPa) with an intense eastward interplanetary electric field (IEFY ≥ 2.5 mV/m) within a super‐dense Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection lasted for 409 min–is the key factor that led to the strong ring current at much closer to the Earth causing such an intense storm. Severe electrodynamic disturbances led to a strong positive ionospheric storm with more than 100% increase in dayside ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC), affecting GPS positioning/navigation. Further, an HF radio blackout was found to occur in the 2–12 MHz frequency band due to strong D‐ and E‐region ionization resulting from a solar flare prior to this storm.

meteorology & atmospheric sciences,geochemistry & geophysics,astronomy & astrophysics
Large‐Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Over the European Sector During the Geomagnetic Storm on March 23–24, 2023: Energy Deposition in the Source Regions and the Propagation Characteristics

Grzegorz Nykiel,Arthur Ferreira,Florian Günzkofer,Pelin Iochem,Samira Tasnim,Hiroatsu Sato

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ja032145

2024-03-16

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 3, March 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
Effects of Subauroral Polarization Streams on Ionospheric Radial Currents During the Geomagnetic Storm on 23 April 2023

Hao Xia,Hui Wang,Kedeng Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja032783

2024-10-02

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 10, October 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
Peculiar Nighttime Ionospheric Enhancements Over the Asian Sector During the May 2024 Superstorm

Fuqing Huang,Jiuhou Lei,Shun‐Rong Zhang,Yihan Wang,Zhongli Li,Jiahao Zhong,Rui Yan,Ercha Aa,Zeren Zhima,Xiaoli Luan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033350

2024-11-29

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Abstract:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 11, November 2024.

astronomy & astrophysics
Different Effects of a Super Storm on Atmospheric Electric Fields at Different Latitudes

Wen Li,Zhibin Sun,Tao Chen,Zhaoai Yan,Jing Luo,Qingchen Xu,Zhongsong Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111314

IF: 3.11

2024-10-31

Atmosphere

Abstract:Geomagnetic storms have a significant impact on Earth's magnetosphere and ionosphere, as well as on the global atmospheric circuit. This study focuses on investigating the anomalous variations in the vertical atmospheric electric field at eight mid-latitude and low-latitude stations during a mega-geomagnetic storm on 24 April 2023. The majority of stations observed vertical atmospheric electric field increases, while only three nearby stations exhibited vertical atmospheric electric field decreases. The analysis revealed that vertical atmospheric electric field changes ranged from 19 to 370 V/m, and the time differences between extreme vertical atmospheric electric field values and the minimum Dst value ranged from 0 to 5.3 h. Other response patterns to this super magnetic storm at different latitudes are summarized, and the physical mechanisms of different effects of magnetic storms on the electric fields of stations at different latitudes are also discussed.

environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences

Significant Midlatitude Plasma Density Peaks and Dual‐Hemisphere SED During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm

Localized Plasma Density Peak at Middle Latitudes During the April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Significant Midlatitude Bubble‐Like Ionospheric Super‐Depletion Structure (BLISS) and Dynamic Variation of Storm‐Enhanced Density Plume During the 23 April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Regional Ionospheric Super Bubble Induced by Significant Upward Plasma Drift During the 1 December 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Dynamic Expansion and Merging of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm

East–West Difference in the Ionospheric Response During the Recovery Phase of May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm Over the East Asian

Midlatitude Plasma Blob‐like Structures Along With Super Equatorial Plasma Bubbles During the May 2024 Great Geomagnetic Storm

Local Time and Hemispheric Asymmetries of Field‐Aligned Currents and Polar Electrojet During May 2024 Superstorm Periods

The Polarity Oscillations of the Equatorial Electrojet in Response to the Geomagnetic Storm on 1 December 2023

The Solar and Geomagnetic Storms in May 2024: A Flash Data Report

Unveiling key factors in solar eruptions leading to the solar superstorm in 2024 May

The April 2023 SYM-H = -233 nT Geomagnetic Storm: A Classical Event

Interplanetary Causes and Impacts of the 2024 May Superstorm on the Geosphere: An Overview

A Case Study of Ionospheric Storm‐Time Altitudinal Differences at Low Latitudes During the May 2021 Geomagnetic Storm

Unveiling Key Factors in the Solar Eruptions Leading to the Solar Superstorm in 2024 May

Super‐Intense Geomagnetic Storm on 10–11 May 2024: Possible Mechanisms and Impacts

Large‐Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Over the European Sector During the Geomagnetic Storm on March 23–24, 2023: Energy Deposition in the Source Regions and the Propagation Characteristics

Effects of Subauroral Polarization Streams on Ionospheric Radial Currents During the Geomagnetic Storm on 23 April 2023

Peculiar Nighttime Ionospheric Enhancements Over the Asian Sector During the May 2024 Superstorm

Different Effects of a Super Storm on Atmospheric Electric Fields at Different Latitudes