AlphaFold3 — why did Nature publish it without its code?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01463-0
IF: 64.8
2024-05-23
Nature
Abstract:Criticism of our decision to publish AlphaFold3 raises important questions. We welcome readers' views. Criticism of our decision to publish AlphaFold3 raises important questions. We welcome readers' views.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily discusses the controversies and challenges faced by the journal "Nature" when publishing the AlphaFold3 protein structure prediction algorithm. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **Openness and Transparency**: The paper explores how scientific results (especially research funded by the private sector) should ensure transparency while respecting potential limitations. For example, although "Nature" encourages authors to disclose data, code, and related protocols, it also acknowledges that there may be reasonable restrictions in certain situations. 2. **Release Method of AlphaFold3**: The paper specifically mentions that the release method of AlphaFold3 has sparked controversy. Unlike the fully open-source AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3 only provided a pseudocode description rather than the complete source code. This decision has been questioned and criticized by researchers. 3. **Importance of Collaboration and Dialogue**: The paper emphasizes the importance of collaboration between journals and the private sector and suggests that openness issues should be resolved through dialogue and negotiation. Additionally, the paper calls for the participation of all stakeholders (including researchers, policymakers, NGOs, and publishers) in discussions to promote the open sharing of scientific results. In summary, the paper aims to explore how to balance the openness of scientific results with potential limitations, particularly in the context of increasing private sector-funded research, and how to ensure that research results better serve society and scientific development.