Abstract:Abstract Objective Since the introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dentistry, this technology has enabled distortion-free three-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery diagnosis. However, CBCT is associated with significantly higher radiation exposure than traditional routine bidimensional examinations for orthodontic diagnosis, although low-dose protocols have markedly reduced radiation exposure over time. The objective of this preliminary feasibility study is to compare the accuracy and diagnostic capabilities of an already-validated three-dimensional cephalometric analysis on CBCT to those of an analysis on 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (3T-MRI) to assess whether the latter can deliver a comparable quality of information while avoiding radiation exposure. Materials and methods In order to test the feasibility of three-dimensional cephalometry on 3T-MRI, 18 subjects (4 male; 14 female) with mean age 37.8 ± SD 10.2, who had undergone both maxillofacial CBCT and maxillofacial 3T-MRI for various purposes within 1 month, were selected from the archive of the Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of Fondazione Ospedale Policlinico Maggiore, IRCCS, Milano, Italy. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis composed of ten midsagittal and four bilateral landmarks and 24 measurements (11 angular, 13 linear) was performed on both scans using Mimics Research® v. 17.0 (NV, Technologielaan 15, 3001 Leuven, Belgium). Cephalometric analysis was performed twice by two independent orthodontists for each scan, and each orthodontist repeated the measurements 3 weeks later. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® 20.00 for Windows (IBM® Corporation, Sommers, NY, USA). A Bland-Altman test for each cephalometric value was performed to assess the agreement between the procedures. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The coefficient of variation was used to evaluate precision. Results Both procedures showed good reliability, with mean intraobserver ICCs of 0.977/0.971 for CBCT and 0.881/0.912 for MRI. The average interobserver ICCs were 0.965 for CBCT and 0.833 for MRI. A Bland-Altman analysis for the cephalometric tracing revealed a similar range of agreement between the two modalities; the bias range (mean ± SD) was − 0.25–0.66 mm (0.174 ± 0.31) for distances and − 0.41–0.54° (0.12 ± 0.33) for angles. Conclusions Within the main limitation of this pilot study, that is, the small sample, it is possible to state that cephalometric measurements on 3T-MRI seem to possess adequate reliability and repeatability and that they show satisfying agreement with values measured on CBCTs. An MRI examination does not expose patients to ionizing radiation and could provide an alternative to CBCT for three-dimensional cephalometrics in the future.

Comparison of AI-assisted cephalometric analysis and orthodontist-performed digital tracing analysis

Comparative Analysis of 3D Cephalometry Provided with Artificial Intelligence and Manual Tracing

Comparison of Three Commercially Available, AI-Driven Cephalometric Analysis Tools in Orthodontics

Comparative Evaluation of Digital Cephalometric Tracing Applications on Mobile Devices and Manual Tracing

Comparison of semi and fully automated artificial intelligence driven softwares and manual system for cephalometric analysis

Assessing AudaxCeph®'s cephalometric tracing technology versus a semi-automated approach for analyzing severe Class II and Class III skeletons

Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of cephalometric identification performed by human examiners and two AI-driven tracing applications

Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults

Comparison of Anthropometric and Cephalometric Measurements Obtained by Stereophotogrammetry and 3D Computed Tomography of the Nose Before Septorhinoplasty

Comparative Study of Cephalometric Measurements Using 3 Imaging Modalities.

Artificial intelligence in orthodontics : Evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network

Accuracy of web-based automated versus digital manual cephalometric landmark identification

Comparative analysis of 3D tomography based soft tissue rendering and Proface facial scanning systems in orthognathic surgery

Reliability and accuracy of Artificial intelligence-based software for cephalometric diagnosis. A diagnostic study

Comparison of Methodologies for Craniofacial Soft-tissue Cephalometrics: The Value of Virtual Reality

Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement: A Comparative Study Between Digital Dental Models and Craniofacial Models

Precision of Cephalometric Landmark Identification from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Development, Application, and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Cephalometric Landmark Identification and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics

Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms.