Understanding housing outcomes for Indigenous Australians: What can the 2002 NATSISS add?

W. Sanders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/caepr26.06.2006.07

Abstract:Almost a decade ago, when looking at the 1994 NATSIS, I was able to be very complimentary about what that survey could add to our understanding of housing outcomes for Indigenous Australians. That was largely because, in the housing area, the 1994 NATSIS had improved on previous census collections in two important ways: it had developed a better tenure breakdown, distinguishing between community and private rental dwellings, and it had developed an accessible and useful geographic breakdown into capital cities, other urban, and rural or remote areas. Using the 1994 NATSIS, I was able to show just how different the community and private rental tenures were for Indigenous households and, perhaps more importantly, just how different tenure profiles for these households were in rural and remote areas compared to the cities and other urban areas (Sanders 1996).