Dihydrouracil dehydrogenase of rat liver. Separation of hydrogenase and dehydrogenase activities.

A. Smith,E. Yamada
IF: 5.485
1971-06-10
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Abstract:Abstract 1. The forward and reverse reactions of the enzyme commonly known as dihydrouracil dehydrogenase were found to occur in different compartments of the liver cell. 2. The hydrogenation of uracil was catalyzed by NADH- and NADPH-dependent enzymes. Most of the former was present in the heavy mitochondrial fraction; its distribution resembled that of the mitochondrial marker enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase. The NADPH-dependent uracil hydrogenase activity was distributed mainly between mitochondria and plasma and endoplasmic reticulum membranes; the latter were located by the marker enzymes, 5'-nucleotidase and glucose 6-phosphatase. No uracil hydrogenase activity was measurable either in purified lysosomal or nuclear fractions. The distribution of NADPH-dependent thymine hydrogenase activity followed that of NADPH-uracil hydrogenase. 3. Treatment of particulate fractions with 5.4 m glycerol resulted in 3- to 4-fold increases in both uracil hydrogenase activities. Both activities were inhibited 50% in the presence of ATP plus Mg2+ (10 mm each). The pH optimum for NADPH-uracil hydrogenase was 7.5 to 7.7 whereas that of the NADH enzyme was 6.5 to 6.7. 4. In contrast, the dehydrogenation of dihydrouracil, although also NAD+- or NADP+-dependent, was confined almost entirely to the 160,000 x g supernatant fraction. Activity was increased 2.5-fold by ATP plus Mg2+ (5 to 10 mm each). The pH optimum for the NAD+-dependent activity was 8.8 and that for the NADP+-dependent reaction was 7.5. The distribution of dihydrothymine dehydrogenase activity was similar to that of dihydrouracil dehydrogenase. 5. The rate of hydrogenation of uracil by mitochondrial fractions was from 40 to 65 times as great as that of the reverse reaction with NADP+ as coenzyme and about 30 times as great with NAD+ as coenzyme. 6. Only in the 160,000 x g supernatant fraction was activity for the reverse reaction greater. In this fraction the dehydrogenation of dihydrouracil proceeded at 4 and 7 times the rate of the hydrogenation of uracil in the presence of NADP+ and NAD+, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?