Performance comparison of four lithium–ion battery technologies under calendar aging

Akram Eddahech,Olivier Briat,Jean-Michel Vinassa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.019
IF: 9
2015-05-01
Energy
Abstract:This work depicts the calendar aging results of four Li-ion battery technologies. The differences in the chemistry of Li-ion batteries was studied and revealed that cathodes containing manganese are more sensitive to state-of-charge and temperature increase than lithium–iron-phosphate or lithium–nickel–cobalt–aluminum batteries. The first step in presenting the differences in technology of the Li-ion battery is through the study of the battery voltage evolution versus the amount of charge at various states of health. This study revealed a significant increase in resistance on lithium–nickel–manganese–cobalt and lithium–manganese-oxide cells; a result which was confirmed through impedance spectroscopy measurements. Finally, a study of the comparison of the different types of Li-ion batteries was undertaken, based on the analysis of the evolution of energy efficiency with respect to aging.
energy & fuels,thermodynamics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?