Abstract:The scientific literature is a record of the search for truth. Publication of faked data diverts this search. The scientific community has a duty to warn people to ignore an article containing faked data and must try to prevent inadvertent citation of it. The scientific community accomplishes these tasks by publishing a retraction and linking it to the fraudulent article's citation in electronic indexes of the medical literature, such as PubMed. This mechanism is far from perfect, as shown by a case history of scientific fraud perpetrated by Eric Poehlman, PhD. His institution notified 3 journals that they had published tainted articles. Two journals failed to retract. The third journal retracted immediately, but other authors continued to cite the retracted article. Another duty of the scientific community is to verify the integrity of other articles published by the author of a fraudulent article. This task falls to the author's institution and requires coauthors to vouch for their article's integrity by convincing institutional investigators that the suspect author could not have altered the raw scientific data from their study. Two universities are currently investigating Poehlman's published research. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific literature requires governmental institutions that have the authority to investigate and punish guilty scientists and requires that research institutions investigate alleged fraud. It requires journal editors to issue a retraction when they learn that their journal has published a tainted article. It requires research institutions to accept their responsibility to investigate every article published by a scientist who has published even 1 fraudulent article. Finally, it requires authors to take pains to avoid citing retracted articles and to issue a correction when they inadvertently cite a retracted article.

Science's fake-paper problem: high-profile effort will tackle paper mills

Fake papers compromise research syntheses

Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future

"Research paper mills": A factory outlet for dubious research

Finding the truth in science

Paper trail

Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis

Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences-and one common cause

Rooting out scientific misconduct

Retractions: Stamp out fake peer review

Decontamination of the scientific literature

Study On Paper Dealings And Illegal Journal Problems

Spoof Research Paper is Accepted by 157 Journals

Honesty is being put through the mill

The science of fake news

Integrity at stake: confronting “publish or perish” in the developing world and emerging economies

The natural selection of good science

"I'd like to think I'd be able to spot one if I saw one": How science journalists navigate predatory journals

Plea to publish less

'Doing good science is hard': retraction of high-profile reproducibility study prompts soul-searching

Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case