Assessment of immunosuppression induction with basiliximab compared to antithymocyte‐globulin in adult heart transplant patients

Theresa E. Eberhardt,Daniel H. Kim,Shannon Nethersole,Glen J. Pearson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15332
2024-05-30
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:Background Patients undergoing heart transplants are at risk of rejection which can have significant morbidity and mortality. Induction immunosuppression at the time of transplant reduces the early risk and has additional benefits. The induction agent of choice within our program was changed from rabbit antithymocyte‐globulin (rATG) to basiliximab, so it was necessary to evaluate whether this had any impact on patient outcomes. Objectives Our primary objective was to describe rejection, infection, and other outcomes in adult heart transplant patients at the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada. Methods This study was a nonrandomized, retrospective cohort study. Results Sixty‐three patients were included with median ages 50 years versus 54 years. More female patients received rATG (20% vs. 42.4%). The most common indication for transplant in both cohorts was ICM (63.3% vs. 57.6%). Patients who received rATG had significantly higher PRA (0% vs. 43%, p
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?