A heart transplant center experience with basiliximab induction strategies: A double edged sword?

Luise Holzhauser,Maxwell Norris,Maria Molina,Susan Chambers,Swethika Sundaravel,Eman Rashed,Ketan Gala,Tara Fallah,Therese Bittermann,Nosheen Reza,Teresa Wang,Pavan Atluri,Lee Goldberg,Rhondalyn McLean,Eliot Peyster
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15307
2024-04-05
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:Background The use of induction immunosuppression for heart transplantation (HT) is debated given the uncertain benefit and potential risks of infection and malignancy. Methods This is a retrospective single‐center analysis of 475 consecutive HT recipients from 2003 to 2020 grouped by use of induction with basiliximab group (BG) and the no basiliximab group (NBG). Subgroup analysis by era compared pre‐2016 standard‐basiliximab (BX) induction and 2016–2020 with selective‐BX use as part of a calcineurin‐inhibitor‐sparing regimen. Results When adjusted for confounders (sex, age, PRA, eGFR), the BG was less likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) (OR.42, p
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?