Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist Compared With Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Therapy In Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

w peng,gang liu,wei xie,hsuanshun huang,jihjen wu,zhangfei shou,j chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12663
IF: 2.6
2015-01-01
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Abstract:AimsThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction therapy using the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) under a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death.MethodsIt was a single-centre, retrospective, cohort study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-2RA vs. ATG induction therapy in adult renal transplant recipients from donors after cardiac death. The primary end-point was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 6months, and the secondary end-point included the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), the renal function, and the patient and graft survival at 6months. The safety end-point was the incidence of infectious complications.ResultsA total of 132 patients (n=37 in the IL-2RA group and n=95 in the ATG group) were enrolled from March 2013 to April 2014. The BPAR at 6months was similar between the two groups (IL-2RA vs. the ATG group, 5.4% vs. 12.6%, respectively, p=0.228). There were no differences in the DGF, renal function at 1 and 3months, and the patient and graft survival at 6months between the two groups, but the renal function at 6months in the IL-2RA group was superior to that of the ATG group (p=0.02). The IL-2RA group experienced less infection than the ATG group (p=0.025).ConclusionsThe efficacy of IL2-RA and ATG induction under a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen in low-risk DCD transplantation did not differ, but the safety of the IL2-RA induction was better than that of the ATG induction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?