Abstract:The UK NHS has a number of important strengths. Its costs are relatively low compared to the health care systems of other developed countries due in part to cash limited central budgeting. It is extremely popular with the electorate and surveys show overall satisfaction with the NHS despite some dissatisfaction with waiting lists and a public perception of underfunding. The NHS model of general medical care provided by independent contractors has been acclaimed as "a British success" (General Medical Services Council, 1983). The role of the UK GP combines providing primary care and acting as a gatekeeper to secondary care. This increases equitable access to care for the population and assists in cost containment. As a model, it is currently being emulated in other countries including Sweden and US Health Maintenance Organizations but, as in these countries, the UK primary care model has been evaluated poorly. There are of course continuing weaknesses in the UK health care system. There is insufficient knowledge upon which to base health care services and increase efficiency. In the future, if a knowledge-based health care service is to be created, a considerable amount of research and evaluation is required to identify "what works" in health care (i.e., what is effective) and also the cost effective ways of altering provider behaviour to maximise the amount of health gain which can be achieved using a limited budget. The NHS reforms created a lot of enthusiasm and energy but its effects are difficult to disentangle from the simultaneous increases in funding. There is little evidence from the UK or elsewhere that competition in health care produces efficiency or improvements in resource allocation. Evaluation is required to identify which of the reforms are increasing efficiency. Competition needs to be used with caution and recognised as a mean and not an end in itself. It is remarkable how both clinical practice and health policy reform, in the UK and elsewhere, is poorly evaluated. Medical practice varies substantially locally, regionally, and internationally, e.g., patients with similar age and stage of cancer receive very different levels of radiotherapy across Europe. For most interventions, the appropriate level of treatment may be asserted but is not based on cost effectiveness knowledge. Health policy analysts, like clinicians, make assertions about competition and other health care reforms which are value- rather than knowledge-based. Both groups of decision-makers should be more cautious, informing their choices with research rather than relying on unsubstantiated optimism!

Towards a history of choice in UK health policy

From consumerism to partnership? Britain's National Health Service at the turn of the century

Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world

Constructing health consumers: Private health insurance discourses in Australia and the United Kingdom

Morality, consumerism and the internal market in health care

Reframing the public/private debate on healthcare services: Tracking boundaries in the National Health Service

Managed competition, governmentality and institutional response in the United Kingdom

Universal coverage and cost control: the United Kingdom National Health Service

Free choice of healthcare providers in the Netherlands is both a goal in itself and a precondition: modelling the policy assumptions underlying the promotion of patient choice through documentary analysis and interviews

The impact of market oriented reforms on choice and information: a case study of cataract surgery in outer London and Stockholm

Choosing mental health: a response to the government white paper

Knit Your Own Without a Pattern: Health Promotion Specialists in an Internal Market

Why patients may not exercise their choice when referred for hospital care. An exploratory study based on interviews with patients

Defining 'people-centredness': making the implicit explicit

Market--what market? A review of Health Authority purchasing in the NHS internal market

User choice and the changing notion of social citizenship in Swedish elderly care

An economic analysis of the limits of market based reforms in the English NHS

Patient choice, mobility and competition among health care providers

A decade of outsourcing in health and social care in England: What was it meant to achieve?

Books: The Political Economy of Health Care: Where the NHS Came From and Where it Could Lead

The decline of medical confidentiality medical information management: The illusion of patient choice