Abstract:Species tree estimation from genes sampled from throughout the whole genome is challenging in the presence of gene tree discordance, often caused by incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), where alleles can coexist in populations for periods that may span several speciation events. Quartet-based summary methods for estimating species trees from a collection of gene trees are becoming popular due to their high accuracy and theoretical guarantees of robustness to arbitrarily high amounts of ILS. ASTRAL, the most widely used quartet-based method, aims to infer species trees by maximizing the number of quartets in the gene trees that are consistent with the species tree. An alternative approach (as in wQFM) is to infer quartets for all subsets of four species and amalgamate them into a coherent species tree. While summary methods can be highly sensitive to gene tree estimation errors--especially when gene trees are derived from short alignments--quartet amalgamation offers an advantage by potentially bypassing the need for gene tree estimation. However, greatly understudied is the choice of weighted quartet inference method and downstream effects on species tree estimations under realistic model conditions. In this study, we investigated a broad range of methods for generating weighted quartets and critically assessed their impact on species tree inference. Our results on a collection of simulated and empirical datasets suggest that amalgamating quartets weighted based on gene tree frequencies (GTF) typically produces more accurate trees than leading quartet-based methods like ASTRAL and SVDquartets. Further enhancements in GTF-based weighted quartet estimation were achieved by accounting for gene tree uncertainty, through the utilization of a distribution of trees for each gene (instead of a single tree), by employing traditional nonparametric bootstrapping methods or Bayesian MCMC sampling. Our study provides evidence that the careful generation and amalgamation of weighted quartets, as implemented in methods like wQFM, can lead to significantly more accurate trees compared to widely employed methods like ASTRAL, especially in the face of gene tree estimation errors.

Species Tree Estimation Using ASTRAL: Practical Considerations

Multi-allele species reconstruction using ASTRAL

Species tree estimation using ASTRAL: how many genes are enough?

ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation

The accuracy of species tree inference under gene tree dependence

ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees

ASTRAL-Pro: Quartet-Based Species-Tree Inference despite Paralogy

A systematic assessment of phylogenomic approaches for microbial species tree reconstruction

AleRax: a tool for gene and species tree co-estimation and reconciliation under a probabilistic model of gene duplication, transfer, and loss

Species tree estimation using Neighbor Joining

Phytop: A tool for visualizing and recognizing signals of incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization using species trees output from ASTRAL

Efficient Exploration of the Space of Reconciled Gene Trees

Species tree inference by the STAR method, and generalizations

On the robustness to gene tree rooting (or lack thereof) of triplet-based species tree estimation methods

Leveraging weighted quartet distributions for enhanced species tree inference from genome-wide data

DISCO: Species Tree Inference using Multicopy Gene Family Tree Decomposition

Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus Data

Coalescent-based species tree estimation: a stochastic Farris transform

The Impact of Missing Data on Species Tree Estimation.

Large-scale Species Tree Estimation

The effect of gene flow on coalescent-based species-tree inference