Abstract:Species tree estimation from genes sampled from throughout the whole genome is challenging in the presence of gene tree discordance, often caused by incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), where alleles can coexist in populations for periods that may span several speciation events. Quartet-based summary methods for estimating species trees from a collection of gene trees are becoming popular due to their high accuracy and theoretical guarantees of robustness to arbitrarily high amounts of ILS. ASTRAL, the most widely used quartet-based method, aims to infer species trees by maximizing the number of quartets in the gene trees that are consistent with the species tree. An alternative approach (as in wQFM) is to infer quartets for all subsets of four species and amalgamate them into a coherent species tree. While summary methods can be highly sensitive to gene tree estimation errors--especially when gene trees are derived from short alignments--quartet amalgamation offers an advantage by potentially bypassing the need for gene tree estimation. However, greatly understudied is the choice of weighted quartet inference method and downstream effects on species tree estimations under realistic model conditions. In this study, we investigated a broad range of methods for generating weighted quartets and critically assessed their impact on species tree inference. Our results on a collection of simulated and empirical datasets suggest that amalgamating quartets weighted based on gene tree frequencies (GTF) typically produces more accurate trees than leading quartet-based methods like ASTRAL and SVDquartets. Further enhancements in GTF-based weighted quartet estimation were achieved by accounting for gene tree uncertainty, through the utilization of a distribution of trees for each gene (instead of a single tree), by employing traditional nonparametric bootstrapping methods or Bayesian MCMC sampling. Our study provides evidence that the careful generation and amalgamation of weighted quartets, as implemented in methods like wQFM, can lead to significantly more accurate trees compared to widely employed methods like ASTRAL, especially in the face of gene tree estimation errors.

On the robustness to gene tree rooting (or lack thereof) of triplet-based species tree estimation methods

Estimating Species Trees from Quartet Gene Tree Distributions under the Coalescent Model

Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent

Leveraging weighted quartet distributions for enhanced species tree inference from genome-wide data

Phylogenetic network-assisted rooting of unrooted gene trees

ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation

Computing the probability of gene trees concordant with the species tree in the multispecies coalescent

A systematic assessment of phylogenomic approaches for microbial species tree reconstruction

QT-WEAVER: Correcting quartet distribution improves phylogenomic analyses despite gene tree estimation error

A tale of too many trees: a conundrum for phylogenetic regression

Properties of Consensus Methods for Inferring Species Trees from Gene Trees

Large-scale Species Tree Estimation

Efficient Exploration of the Space of Reconciled Gene Trees

ASTRAL-Pro: Quartet-Based Species-Tree Inference despite Paralogy

ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees

The Impact of Missing Data on Species Tree Estimation.

SPAGETI: Stabilizing Phylogenetic Assessment with Gene Evolutionary Tree Indices

Improved Core Genes Prediction for Constructing well-supported Phylogenetic Trees in large sets of Plant Species

Anomaly zones for uniformly sampled gene trees under the gene duplication and loss model

The accuracy of species tree inference under gene tree dependence

Coalescent-based species tree estimation: a stochastic Farris transform