Abstract:Species tree estimation from genes sampled from throughout the whole genome is challenging in the presence of gene tree discordance, often caused by incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), where alleles can coexist in populations for periods that may span several speciation events. Quartet-based summary methods for estimating species trees from a collection of gene trees are becoming popular due to their high accuracy and theoretical guarantees of robustness to arbitrarily high amounts of ILS. ASTRAL, the most widely used quartet-based method, aims to infer species trees by maximizing the number of quartets in the gene trees that are consistent with the species tree. An alternative approach (as in wQFM) is to infer quartets for all subsets of four species and amalgamate them into a coherent species tree. While summary methods can be highly sensitive to gene tree estimation errors--especially when gene trees are derived from short alignments--quartet amalgamation offers an advantage by potentially bypassing the need for gene tree estimation. However, greatly understudied is the choice of weighted quartet inference method and downstream effects on species tree estimations under realistic model conditions. In this study, we investigated a broad range of methods for generating weighted quartets and critically assessed their impact on species tree inference. Our results on a collection of simulated and empirical datasets suggest that amalgamating quartets weighted based on gene tree frequencies (GTF) typically produces more accurate trees than leading quartet-based methods like ASTRAL and SVDquartets. Further enhancements in GTF-based weighted quartet estimation were achieved by accounting for gene tree uncertainty, through the utilization of a distribution of trees for each gene (instead of a single tree), by employing traditional nonparametric bootstrapping methods or Bayesian MCMC sampling. Our study provides evidence that the careful generation and amalgamation of weighted quartets, as implemented in methods like wQFM, can lead to significantly more accurate trees compared to widely employed methods like ASTRAL, especially in the face of gene tree estimation errors.

Estimating Species Trees from Quartet Gene Tree Distributions under the Coalescent Model

ASTRAL-Pro: Quartet-Based Species-Tree Inference despite Paralogy

QUARTET CONSISTENCY COUNT METHOD FOR RECONSTRUCTING PHYLOGENETIC TREES

Leveraging weighted quartet distributions for enhanced species tree inference from genome-wide data

On the robustness to gene tree rooting (or lack thereof) of triplet-based species tree estimation methods

Species tree estimation using Neighbor Joining

Computing the probability of gene trees concordant with the species tree in the multispecies coalescent

QT-WEAVER: Correcting quartet distribution improves phylogenomic analyses despite gene tree estimation error

Coalescent-based species tree estimation: a stochastic Farris transform

Identifiability of Level-1 Species Networks from Gene Tree Quartets

Quartet Sampling distinguishes lack of support from conflicting support in the green plant tree of life

Median quartet tree search algorithms using optimal subtree prune and regraft

Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus Data

The effect of gene flow on coalescent-based species-tree inference

TINNiK: inference of the tree of blobs of a species network under the coalescent model

ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation

Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent

QS-Net: Reconstructing Phylogenetic Networks Based on Quartet and Sextet

Sequential importance sampling for multi-resolution Kingman-Tajima coalescent counting

Efficient Bayesian species tree inference under the multi-species coalescent