Abstract:Abstract Phylogenies inferred using both concatenation- and coalescent-based analyses typically render highly congruent trees. However, when they disagree, they often differ with respect to historically contentious and evolutionarily important relationships. These relationships may also involve etiolated lineages where increased sampling is not possible. Recently, methods aimed at interrogating single relationships or trees have emerged as promising investigative tools to examine these cases. Although recent methods such as “Edge-based Phylogenomic Support analYsis” (EPSY) led to insights into both systematic error and real biological signal, whether they are consistent with the coalescent in cases with high Incomplete Lineage Sorting (ILS) has yet to be characterized. Here, we use simulations and an empirical dataset to test the performance of EPSY, concatenation, and coalescent-based summary analyses under high levels of ILS. We focused on high-ILS scenarios because these represent the typical difficult cases that researchers often face due to the prevalence of ILS in phylogenomic datasets. ILS is known to be a major cause of phylogenomic conflict, which confounds many biological conclusions that depend on a resolved phylogeny, such as inferring ancestral character states, biogeographic reconstructions, and domestication histories. Our study found that EPSY was consistent with the coalescent in a high-ILS empirical dataset. In high-ILS simulations EPSY infers the correct edge more than half the time, whereas coalescent based methods and concatenation methods inferred the actual tree 37.8% and 25% of the time, respectively. All methods have conditions under which they generate the most accurate inferences. Given the levels of ILS in simulations, 26.2% of the time no method recovered the true tree. This zone where no current method can infer the true topology is likely due to properties of the species tree, such as the length of internal edges adjacent to a conflict and/or the length of the shortest branch. Nevertheless, the EPSY approach proves to be a valuable complement to phylogenomic analyses for interrogating regions of the tree with conflicting hypotheses generated from past studies or alternative inference methods. Our analyses highlight that robust phylogenetic trees may not be possible under some scenarios regardless of method and data source.

The Impact of Missing Data on Species Tree Estimation.

Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication

Species Tree Inference Methods Intended to Deal with Incomplete Lineage Sorting Are Robust to the Presence of Paralogs

Genes with Minimal Phylogenetic Information Are Problematic for Coalescent Analyses when Gene Tree Estimation is Biased

When species trees disagree: an approach consistent with the coalescent that quantifies phylogenomic support for contentious relationships

Coalescent Methods Are Robust to the Simultaneous Effects of Long Branches and Incomplete Lineage Sorting

Estimating phylogenetic trees from genome-scale data

The accuracy of species tree inference under gene tree dependence

A tale of too many trees: a conundrum for phylogenetic regression

Large-scale Species Tree Estimation

An Investigation Of Irreproducibility In Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Inference

Impact of Ghost Introgression on Coalescent-based Species Tree Inference and Estimation of Divergence Time

A systematic assessment of phylogenomic approaches for microbial species tree reconstruction

The Perfect Storm: Gene Tree Estimation Error, Incomplete Lineage Sorting, and Ancient Gene Flow Explain the Most Recalcitrant Ancient Angiosperm Clade, Malpighiales.

No substitute for real data: phylogenies from birth-death polytomy resolvers should not be used for many downstream comparative analyses

ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation

Optimal data partitioning, multispecies coalescent and Bayesian concordance analyses resolve early divergences of the grape family (Vitaceae)

Computational Performance and Statistical Accuracy of *BEAST and Comparisons with Other Methods

The Influence of the Number of Tree Searches on Maximum Likelihood Inference in Phylogenomics.

Importance of Synonymous Substitutions under Dense Taxon Sampling and Appropriate Modeling in Reconstructing the Mitogenomic Tree of Eutheria.

Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study