Abstract:Divergence time estimation-the calibration of a phylogeny to geological time-is an integral first step in modeling the tempo of biological evolution (traits and lineages). However, despite increasingly sophisticated methods to infer divergence times from molecular genetic sequences, the estimated age of many nodes across the tree of life contrast significantly and consistently with timeframes conveyed by the fossil record. This is perhaps best exemplified by crown angiosperms, where molecular clock (Triassic) estimates predate the oldest (Early Cretaceous) undisputed angiosperm fossils by tens of millions of years or more. While the incompleteness of the fossil record is a common concern, issues of data limitation and model inadequacy are viable (if underexplored) alternative explanations. In this vein, Beaulieu et al. (2015) convincingly demonstrated how methods of divergence time inference can be misled by both (i) extreme state-dependent molecular substitution rate heterogeneity and (ii) biased sampling of representative major lineages. These results demonstrate the impact of (potentially common) model violations. Here, we suggest another potential challenge: that the configuration of the statistical inference problem (i.e., the parameters, their relationships, and associated priors) alone may preclude the reconstruction of the paleontological timeframe for the crown age of angiosperms. We demonstrate, through sampling from the joint prior (formed by combining the tree (diversification) prior with the calibration densities specified for fossil-calibrated nodes) that with no data present at all, that an Early Cretaceous crown angiosperms is rejected (i.e., has essentially zero probability). More worrisome, however, is that for the 24 nodes calibrated by fossils, almost all have indistinguishable marginal prior and posterior age distributions when employing routine lognormal fossil calibration priors. These results indicate that there is inadequate information in the data to over-rule the joint prior. Given that these calibrated nodes are strategically placed in disparate regions of the tree, they act to anchor the tree scaffold, and so the posterior inference for the tree as a whole is largely determined by the pseudodata present in the (often arbitrary) calibration densities. We recommend, as for any Bayesian analysis, that marginal prior and posterior distributions be carefully compared to determine whether signal is coming from the data or prior belief, especially for parameters of direct interest. This recommendation is not novel. However, given how rarely such checks are carried out in evolutionary biology, it bears repeating. Our results demonstrate the fundamental importance of prior/posterior comparisons in any Bayesian analysis, and we hope that they further encourage both researchers and journals to consistently adopt this crucial step as standard practice. Finally, we note that the results presented here do not refute the biological modeling concerns identified by Beaulieu et al. (2015). Both sets of issues remain apposite to the goals of accurate divergence time estimation, and only by considering them in tandem can we move forward more confidently.

Impact of Ghost Introgression on Coalescent-based Species Tree Inference and Estimation of Divergence Time

Ghost Lineages Highly Influence the Interpretation of Introgression Tests

Ghost Introgression: Spooky Gene Flow in the Distant Past

Detection of Ghost Introgression Requires Exploiting Topological and Branch Length Information

Uncovering Ghost Introgression Through Genomic Analysis of a Distinct East Asian Hickory Species

Detection of Ghost Introgression from Phylogenomic Data Requires a Full-Likelihood Approach

The effect of gene flow on coalescent-based species-tree inference

Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication

Phylogeny-aware simulations suggest a low impact of unsampled lineages in the inference of gene flow during eukaryogenesis

Inferring the direction of introgression using genomic sequence data

The Past Sure is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates

The Impact of Missing Data on Species Tree Estimation.

From gene trees to species trees II: Species tree inference in the deep coalescence model

Towards reliable detection of introgression in the presence of among-species rate variation

The accuracy of species tree inference under gene tree dependence

Coalescent Methods Are Robust to the Simultaneous Effects of Long Branches and Incomplete Lineage Sorting

Response to "On the impact of incomplete taxon sampling on the relative timing of gene transfer events"

Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories

Gene Flow Increases Phylogenetic Structure and Inflates Cryptic Species Estimations: A Case Study on Widespread Philippine Puddle Frogs (Occidozyga laevis)

Gene flow can reveal ghost lineages