Evaluation of different permanent modifiers for the determination of arsenic in environmental samples by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Eder C Lima,Jorge L Brasil,Júlio C P Vaghetti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00046-8
IF: 6.1
2003-05-28
Talanta
Abstract:Single noble metal permanent modifiers such as, Rh, Ir, and Ru, as well as mixed tungsten plus noble metal (W-Rh, W-Ru, W-Ir) permanent modifiers thermally deposited on the integrated platform of transversally heated graphite atomizer were employed for the determination of arsenic in sludges, soils, sediments, coals, ashes and waters by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Microwave digests of solid samples and water samples were employed for obtaining the analytical characteristics of the methods with different permanent modifiers. The performance of the modifiers for arsenic determination in the real samples depended strongly on the type of permanent modifier chosen. The single noble metal (Rh, Ir and Ru) permanent modifiers were suitable for the analyte determinations in simpler matrices such as waters (recoveries of certified values 95-105%), but the analyte recoveries of certified values in sludges, soils, sediments, coals, and ashes were always lower than 90%. On the other hand, for the determination of arsenic, using W-Rh, W-Ru, and W-Ir permanent modifiers presented recoveries of certified values within 95-105% for all the samples. Long-term stability curves obtained for the determination of arsenic in environmental samples with different permanent modifiers (Rh, Ir, Ru, W-Rh, W-Ir, W-Ru) showed that the improvement in the tube lifetime depends on the tungsten deposit onto the platform. The tungsten plus noble metal permanent modifier presents a tube lifetime of at least 35% longer when compared with single permanent modifier. The results for the determination of As employing different permanent modifiers in the samples were in agreement with the certified reference materials, since no statistical differences were found after applying the paired t-test at the 95% confidence level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?