Dosimetry of a novel converging X‐ray source for kilovoltage radiotherapy
Tyler Stalbaum,Larry Partain,Michael D. Weil,Joon Kim,Jae Y. Han,Michael J. Plies,Hong Chen,Vitaliy Ziskin,Magdalena Bazalova‐Carter,Samuel Song,Roy Rand,Douglas Boyd
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15167
IF: 4.506
2021-08-25
Medical Physics
Abstract:PurposeThe objective of this work was to evaluate phantom dosimetry of a novel kilovoltage (kV) x-ray source, which employs a stationary tungsten anode and a linearly swept scanning electron-beam. The source utilizes converging x-ray collimation along with orthogonal mechanical rotation to distribute surface flux over large area. In this study, this was investigated as a potential solution to fast-falloff limitations expected with kV radiotherapy. This was done with the aim of future clinical development of a lower-cost radiotherapy alternative to megavoltage (MV) linac systems. MethodsRadiochromic film was employed for dosimetry on the kV x-ray source of the Linear-Converging Radiotherapy System (LCRS). The source utilizes charge particle optics to magnetically deflect and focus an electron beam along a stationary, reflection tungsten target in an ultra-high-vacuum stainless-steel chamber. Resulting x-rays were collimated into converging beamlets that span a large planar angle and converge at the system isocenter. In this study, radiochromic film dosimetry was done at 140 and 145 kVp for a designated planning treatment volume (PTV) of 4-cm diameter. An acrylic phantom was employed for dose distribution measurements of stationary and rotational delivery. Film dosimetry was evaluated in planes parallel to the source x-ray window at various depths, as well as in the plane of gantry rotation. ResultsAt 140 and 145 kVp and using a collimated 4-cm square field at depth, lesion-to-skin dose ratio was shown to improve with additional beams from different relative source positions, where the different beams are focused at the same isocenter and do not overlap at the phantom surface. It was only possible to achieve a 1:1 Dmax-to-surface ratio with four delivery beams, but the ratio improved to 4:1 with 12 beams, focused at the same isocenter depth of 7.8 cm in an acrylic phantom. For the tests conducted, the following Dmax-to-surface ratios were obtained: 0.4:1 lesion-to-skin ratio for stationary delivery from one entry beam, 0.71:1 lesion-to-skin ratio was obtained for two beams, 1.07:1 ratio for four beams, and 4:1 for 12 beams. Dose-depth profiles were evaluated for stationary and rotational dosimetry. Additionally, rotational dosimetry was measured for a case more analogous to a clinical scenario, where the isocenter was located at an off-center simulated lesion. ConclusionsThe results demonstrate potential dose-depth improvements with kV arc therapy by distributing the surface flux with a wide converging beam along with perpendicular mechanical source rotation of the LCRS. The system delivered tolerable dose to a large surface area when a threshold of multiple, separated beams was reached. The radiochromic film data supports the feasibility of the construct of the LCRS kV radiotherapy system design.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging