Abstract:Background: Orthodontic treatment has gained popularity since beginning of era of dentistry. Now a day, everyone is conscious about their appearance, smile and function. During orthodontic treatment use of brackets and adhesives are common. The bonding of brackets will cause demineralization which requires the fluoridation. So the study has been under- taken to analyze the pattern of fluoride release by commercially available adhesive bonding material for the prevention of demineralization. Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical significance of quantity and pattern of fluoride release from three commercially available adhesives. Objectives: To assess the pattern of fluoride release and quantity, to reduce the decalcification of enamel around orthodontic brackets and bands during treatment and to prevent further use of topical fluoride both office and self-use agents for prevention of demineralization/for remineralization. Materials and methods: The comparison of quantity and pattern of fluoride release study involved commercially available bonding adhesives. They are: Group I--resin reinforced glass Ionomer light cure material (OrthoLC), Group II--fluoride releasing composite resin material (Excel) and Group III--conventional composite (Relay-a-bond) evaluated on 78 freshly extracted premolar teeth divided into three groups consisting 26 specimens in each group. The prepared specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37°C in an incubator for subsequent fluoride analysis using ORION ion selective electrode coupled with ionalyzer 901. Fluoride analysis made at 24 hours intervals for first 3 consecutive days and thereafter at the end of 10th, 17th, 24th and 31st day of bonding. The data obtained were tabulated and interpreted by statistical analysis using 't' test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Observations and results: The quantity of fluoride release in groups I and II was significant even at the end of 31st day. The one-way AVOVA showed intra and inter group significance in the quantity of fluoride release. But group III with zero fluoride release with significant decalcification on enamel which requires external use of topical fluorides. The pattern of fluoride released was 3.06 ppm for group I and 2.01 ppm for group II and was declined sharply after 24 hours; and continued to decline in subsequent weeks. Mean quantity of fluoride release by group I was 15.08 ppm were as group II was 9.02 ppm over the test period of 31 days. At the end of 31st day the group I bonding adhesive was releasing considerable amount of fluoride compared to group II whereas group III was nil. At all the periods inter and intra group mean values were highly significant. And group III acted as base line or control group as it was non-fluoride releasing material. Conclusion: Both the fluoride releasing adhesive bond material are useful to reduce the risk of demineralization and further prevent the usage of topical fluoride application and reduce cost and clinical visiting time for both patient and clinician.

Quantitative analysis of adhesion of cariogenic streptococci to orthodontic raw materials

Surface characteristics of orthodontic materials and their effects on adhesion of mutans streptococci

Variation in adhesion of Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in saliva-derived biofilms on raw materials of orthodontic brackets

The formation of cariogenic plaque to contemporary adhesive restorative materials: an in vitro study

Effects of Saliva Contamination on Bonding Performance of Self-Etching Adhesives

Effect of direct tooth-colored restorative materials on early adhesion of Streptococcus mutans

Effects of surface properties of polymer-based restorative materials on early adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in vitro

Bacterial adhesion affinities of various implant abutment materials

In vitro Assessment of the Antimicrobial Properties of Orthodontic Bonding Materials

Effects of salivary contamination on the shear bond strengths of universal adhesives to dentin

In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel.

Effect of Saliva on the Tensile Bond Strength of Different Generation Adhesive Systems: An In-Vitro Study

Adhesion of different bacterium to the surface of restorative materials in vitro]

Influence of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching adhesive systems

[Effects of Three Self-Etch Adhesives and Mild Salivary Contamination on the Bonding Durability of Deciduous Teeth].

Evaluation and comparison of quantity and pattern of fluoride release from orthodontic adhesives: an in vitro study

Initial bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on novel restorative materials used in paediatric dentistry

Impact of fluoride-releasing orthodontic adhesives on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to eroded enamel following different surface treatment protocols

Effect of Saliva Contamination and Decontamination on Bovine Enamel Bond Strength of Four Self-Etching Adhesives.

Temporal dynamics of adhesion of oral bacteria to orthodontic appliances

Does staining orthodontic adhesive provide an advantage in adhesive resin removal and enamel roughness? An in vitro study