Abstract:Statement of problem: Several additively and subtractively manufactured resin-based materials indicated for interim and definitive fixed dental prostheses have been launched. However, knowledge of the bond strength of these materials to different implant abutment materials is limited. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of additively and subtractively manufactured resin-based materials to different implant abutment materials. Material and methods: One hundred and ten disk-shaped specimens (Ø3×3 mm) were fabricated either additively from 2 resins indicated for definitive use (Crowntec; AM_CT and VarseoSmile Crown Plus; AM_VS) and 1 resin indicated for interim use (FREEPRINT temp; AM_FP) or subtractively from a nanographene-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (G-CAM; SM_GC) and a high-impact polymer composite (breCAM.HIPC; SM_BC). After allocating 2 specimens from each group for scanning electron microscope evaluation, the specimens were divided according to the abutment material (CopraPeek; polyetheretherketone, PEEK and Dentium Superline Pre-Milled Abutment; titanium, Ti) (n=10). All specimens were airborne-particle abraded with 50-µm aluminum oxide. After applying a resin primer (Visio.link) to PEEK and an adhesive primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus) to Ti specimens, a self-adhesive resin cement (PANAVIA SA Cement Universal) was used for cementation. All specimens were stored in distilled water (24 hours, 37 °C), and a universal testing device was used for the SBS test. SBS data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests, while the chi-squared test was used to evaluate the difference among the abutment-resin pairs in terms of failure modes (α=.05). Results: The interaction between the material type and the abutment type and the main factor of material type affected the SBS (P<.001). SM_BC-PEEK and SM_GC had the lowest SBS followed by SM_BC-Ti, whereas AM_VS-PEEK had the highest SBS (P≤.001). AM_CT-Ti had higher SBS than AM_FP-PEEK (P=.026). SM_GC had the lowest and AM_VS had the highest SBS, while AM_CT and AM_FP had higher SBS than SM_BC (P≤.004). The distribution of failure modes was significantly different among tested material-abutment pairs, and only for AM_CT among tested materials (P≤.025). Most of the material-abutment pairs had a minimum of 80% adhesive failures. Conclusions: Regardless of the abutment material, additively manufactured specimens had higher bond strength and one of the subtractively manufactured materials (SM_GC) mostly had lower bond strength. The abutment material had a small effect on the bond strength. Adhesive failures were observed most frequently.

Bacterial adhesion affinities of various implant abutment materials

Biofilm formation on metal alloys and coatings, zirconia, and hydroxyapatite as implant materials in vivo

The Effects of Dental Hygiene Instruments on Streptococcus sanguinis Adhesion to Titanium Implant Abutments

In vitro effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments

Temporal dynamics of adhesion of oral bacteria to orthodontic appliances

Quantitative analysis of adhesion of cariogenic streptococci to orthodontic raw materials

Relevance of surface characteristics in the adhesiveness of polymicrobial biofilms to crown restoration materials

Enhanced Bacterial and Biofilm Adhesion Resistance of ALD Nano-TiO2 Coatings Compared to AO Coatings on Titanium Abutments

Initial bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on novel restorative materials used in paediatric dentistry

A comparative finite element analysis of titanium, poly-ether-etherketone, and zirconia abutment on stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants

Bond strength of recently introduced computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing resin-based crown materials to polyetheretherketone and titanium

The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants

Surface roughness associated with bacterial adhesion on dental resin-based materials

Network meta-analysis of survival rate and complications in implant-supported single crowns with different abutment materials

The Influence of Selected Titanium Alloy Micro-Texture Parameters on Bacterial Adhesion

Evaluation of Adhesion Protocol for Titanium Base Abutments to Different Ceramic and Hybrid Materials

Fibroblasts and osteoblasts behavior after contact with different titanium surfaces used as implant abutment: An in vitro experimental study

Variation in adhesion of Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in saliva-derived biofilms on raw materials of orthodontic brackets

Surface Characteristics and Cell Adhesion: A Comparative Study of Four Commercial Dental Implants

Fibrin clot adherence on cleaned and decontaminated titanium abutment surfaces: An in vitro study

Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study