Does generative AI help academics to do more or less?

Richard Watermeyer,Donna Lanclos,Lawrie Phipps

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00115-7

IF: 64.8

2024-01-16

Nature

Abstract:Letter to the Editor

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Generative AI and the Automating of Academia

Richard Watermeyer,Lawrie Phipps,Donna Lanclos,Cathryn Knight

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00440-6

2023-11-06

Postdigital Science and Education

Abstract:Abstract The neoliberal transformation of higher education in the UK and an intertwined focus on the productive efficiency and prestige value of universities has led to an epidemic of overwork and precarity among academics. Many are found to be struggling with lofty performance expectations and an insistence that all dimensions of their work consistently achieve positional gains despite ferocious competition and the omnipresent threat of failure. Working under the current audit culture present across education, academics are thus found to overwork or commit to accelerated labour as pre-emptive compensation for the habitual inclemency of peer-review and vagaries of student evaluation, in accommodating the copiousness of ‘invisible’ tasks, and in eluding the myriad crevasses of their precarious labour. The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools and more specifically, large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, offers potential relief for academics and a means to offset intensive demands and discover more of a work-based equilibrium. Through a recent survey of n = 284 UK academics and their use of GAI, we discover, however, that the digitalisation of higher education through GAI tools no more alleviates than extends the dysfunctions of neoliberal logic and deepens academia’s malaise. Notwithstanding, we argue that the proliferating use of GAI tools by academics may be harnessed as a source of positive disruption to the industrialisation of their labour and catalyst of (re)engagement with scholarly craftsmanship.
Generative artificial intelligence and academia: Implication for research, teaching and service

Amon Barros,Ajnesh Prasad,Martyna Śliwa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231201445

2023-10-07

Management Learning

Abstract:Management Learning, Ahead of Print. In this editorial, we identify some of the opportunities and the consequences of generative artificial intelligence for academia. We discuss how generative artificial intelligence will affect the three main areas of an academic's job responsibilities: research, teaching and service. To animate our ideas, we offer illustrative examples of how generative artificial intelligence will impact each of these areas. Further recognizing that generative artificial intelligence poses both opportunities and consequences for academia from a management learning perspective, we use examples that represent a positive and a negative outcome resultant of generative artificial intelligence to each of the three areas of academic responsibility.

management
Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content

Anil R. Doshi,Oliver P. Hauser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290

IF: 13.6

2024-07-13

Science Advances

Abstract:Creativity is core to being human. Generative artificial intelligence (AI)—including powerful large language models (LLMs)—holds promise for humans to be more creative by offering new ideas, or less creative by anchoring on generative AI ideas. We study the causal impact of generative AI ideas on the production of short stories in an online experiment where some writers obtained story ideas from an LLM. We find that access to generative AI ideas causes stories to be evaluated as more creative, better written, and more enjoyable, especially among less creative writers. However, generative AI–enabled stories are more similar to each other than stories by humans alone. These results point to an increase in individual creativity at the risk of losing collective novelty. This dynamic resembles a social dilemma: With generative AI, writers are individually better off, but collectively a narrower scope of novel content is produced. Our results have implications for researchers, policy-makers, and practitioners interested in bolstering creativity.

multidisciplinary sciences
Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: an analysis of the perceptions of researchers in training

Ricardo Pereira,Ingrid Weingärtner Reis,Vânia Ulbricht,Neri dos Santos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-01-2024-1501

2024-08-14

Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management

Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between academic writing and generative artificial intelligence (AI). Design/methodology/approach This paper is characterized as exploratory and descriptive, with a qualitative approach. Two approaches were used: the first, a narrative review of the literature with a systematic search from which a data collection stage was carried out using asynchronous interviews by means of an online questionnaire. Findings The results indicate that generative AI should be seen as a complementary tool for creative and critical academic writing. The data collected also highlighted issues related to academic dishonesty and the new type of plagiarism – plagiarism made possible by technologies – as well as issues of authorship and legitimacy of work carried out with AI and the loss of reflective and critical thinking and creativity. Research limitations/implications The considerable increase in resources using AI in all dimensions of human life. Practical implications The impact that the use of generative AIs can have on the creation of knowledge and the dissemination of scientific research. Social implications The impact that the use of generative AIs can have on the creation of knowledge and on the dissemination of scientific research. Originality/value The need for academia to anticipate the use of AI in academic writing and to incorporate its benefits into this process, especially considering researchers in training.
Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors

Aashish Ghimire,James Prather,John Edwards

2024-03-23

Abstract:The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and the expanding integration of large language models (LLMs) have ignited a debate about their application in education. This study delves into university instructors' experiences and attitudes toward AI language models, filling a gap in the literature by analyzing educators' perspectives on AI's role in the classroom and its potential impacts on teaching and learning. The objective of this research is to investigate the level of awareness, overall sentiment towardsadoption, and the factors influencing these attitudes for LLMs and generative AI-based tools in higher education. Data was collected through a survey using a Likert scale, which was complemented by follow-up interviews to gain a more nuanced understanding of the instructors' viewpoints. The collected data was processed using statistical and thematic analysis techniques. Our findings reveal that educators are increasingly aware of and generally positive towards these tools. We find no correlation between teaching style and attitude toward generative AI. Finally, while CS educators show far more confidence in their technical understanding of generative AI tools and more positivity towards them than educators in other fields, they show no more confidence in their ability to detect AI-generated work.

Artificial Intelligence
Generative AI: Challenges to higher education

Sencer Yeralan,Laura Ancona Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37868/sei.v5i2.id196

2023-09-08

Sustainable Engineering and Innovation

Abstract:Generative Artificial Intelligence has rapidly expanded its footprint of use in educational institutions. It has been embraced by students, faculty, and staff alike. The technology is capable of carrying out a sustained sequence of interactive dialogs and creating reasonably meaningful text. Not surprisingly it seems to be routinely used by faculty to generate questions and assignments, by students to submit assignments and aid in self-learning, and administration to create manuals, memoranda, and policy documents. With its potential to lead to significant social innovation, tethering on the verge of becoming a disruptive technology, it seems most unlikely that it will fade away without being fully enfolded into almost all aspects of academic and pedagogical activity. While it is early to predict the exact place of this technology in education, we present thoughts to aid deliberations and give a brief review of the opportunities and challenges.
Exploring the role of generative AI in academia: Opportunities and challenges

Subhajit Panda,Navkiran Kaur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijlsit.2024.003

2024-08-04

IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology

Abstract:This paper aims to comprehensively examine the multifaceted role of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) within academic settings, exploring its diverse applications, opportunities, and challenges. Employing a systematic review approach, this study synthesizes and analyzes the existing literature pertaining to the integration of AI in academia. It critically evaluates the varied applications of generative AI tools across different domains such as literature review, visualization, content generation, plagiarism detection, language enhancement, data analysis, and journal selection. The examination reveals a myriad of advantages brought forth by generative AI applications, including a substantial reduction in researchers' workloads, time-saving mechanisms, the extraction of valuable insights from extensive datasets, and an overall enhancement in the quality of scholarly outputs. However, alongside these benefits, several challenges and limitations emerge. These include concerns regarding accuracy and reliability, ethical implications, limitations in linguistic and contextual understanding, potential hindrance to critical thinking and creativity, issues with data visualization, training requirements, staying updated with recent research, and the complexity and costs associated with specialized training. This paper provides a comprehensive and structured overview of the applications, advantages, and challenges of utilizing generative AI in academic settings. It synthesizes existing knowledge, critically evaluates the implications, and highlights the need for a balanced approach to harness the full potential of AI while mitigating ethical and practical challenges. The paper's contribution lies in offering a holistic view of AI's impact on academia, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts among stakeholders to maximize benefits while ensuring ethical standards and academic integrity.
Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Write an Academic Journal Article? Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications

Hsiao-Ping Hsu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.152

2023-12-07

Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning

Abstract:This article offers an in-depth reflection on the author’s experiences with Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI), ChatGPT 4.0. The author started the journey from their initial need for software for English proofreading and editing services to their interest in exploring pre-service teachers’ application of Gen AI in lesson planning. Based on prompt engineering techniques, an iterative three-stage manuscript generation process—brainstorming, refinement, and writing—with ChatGPT is detailed. A short paper generated by ChatGPT is presented. Although Gen AI is a valuable tool in providing insights and assistance in research idea generation and design, academic writing, and English writing learning, the author cautions that critical thinking plays a vital role in ensuring accuracy, ethical considerations, and the preservation of rigorous scholarly standards. As Gen AI emerges as a game-changer in academia and education, this article highlights the importance of balancing its emerging capabilities with maintaining traditional academic and educational values.

English Else
Generative AI and Its Educational Implications

Kacper Łodzikowski,Peter W. Foltz,John T. Behrens

2024-01-24

Abstract:We discuss the implications of generative AI on education across four critical sections: the historical development of AI in education, its contemporary applications in learning, societal repercussions, and strategic recommendations for researchers. We propose ways in which generative AI can transform the educational landscape, primarily via its ability to conduct assessment of complex cognitive performances and create personalized content. We also address the challenges of effective educational tool deployment, data bias, design transparency, and accurate output verification. Acknowledging the societal impact, we emphasize the need for updating curricula, redefining communicative trust, and adjusting to transformed social norms. We end by outlining the ways in which educational stakeholders can actively engage with generative AI, develop fluency with its capacities and limitations, and apply these insights to steer educational practices in a rapidly advancing digital landscape.

Computers and Society
Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI

Zhicheng Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8

2024-08-13

Abstract:Academic writing is an indispensable yet laborious part of the research enterprise. This Perspective maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing. We introduce a human-AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (why), process (how), and nature (what) of AI engagement in writing. The framework pinpoints both short-term and long-term reasons for engagement and their underlying mechanisms (e.g., cognitive offloading and imaginative stimulation). It reveals the role of AI throughout the writing process, conceptualized through a two-stage model for human-AI collaborative writing, and the nature of AI assistance in writing, represented through a model of writing-assistance types and levels. Building on this framework, we describe effective prompting techniques for incorporating AI into the writing routine (outlining, drafting, and editing) as well as strategies for maintaining rigorous scholarship, adhering to varied journal policies, and avoiding overreliance on AI. Ultimately, the prudent integration of AI into academic writing can ease the communication burden, empower authors, accelerate discovery, and promote diversity in science.

Computers and Society,Computation and Language
Generative AI: is it a paradigm shift for higher education?

Xianghan O’Dea

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2332944

2024-03-23

Studies in Higher Education

Abstract:In this special issue, we explore the opportunities and challenges of using Generative AI (GenAI), in particular, text generators in higher education learning and teaching. As GenAI has become increasingly popular with many staff and students, this special issue provides an overview of the current state of the field and offers insights into future research. This introduction paper consists of four parts. It begins by providing an overview of AI and Generative AI, identifying the gap and framing the special issue relating to the gaps. The second part explores the opportunities and challenges of GenAI in higher education, as identified in the literature. The third part provides an overview of the papers included in the special issue. The final part is the self-reflection of the lead author. The special issue aims to serve as a valuable resource for higher education stakeholders, such as students, practitioners, researchers and managers. We hope this collection will help advance knowledge and future research, encourage innovation and inform evidence-based policy and practices in the field of Generative AI in higher education.

education & educational research
The Value, Benefits, and Concerns of Generative AI-Powered Assistance in Writing

Zhuoyan Li,Chen Liang,Jing Peng,Ming Yin

2024-03-19

Abstract:Recent advances in generative AI technologies like large language models raise both excitement and concerns about the future of human-AI co-creation in writing. To unpack people's attitude towards and experience with generative AI-powered writing assistants, in this paper, we conduct an experiment to understand whether and how much value people attach to AI assistance, and how the incorporation of AI assistance in writing workflows changes people's writing perceptions and performance. Our results suggest that people are willing to forgo financial payments to receive writing assistance from AI, especially if AI can provide direct content generation assistance and the writing task is highly creative. Generative AI-powered assistance is found to offer benefits in increasing people's productivity and confidence in writing. However, direct content generation assistance offered by AI also comes with risks, including decreasing people's sense of accountability and diversity in writing. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings.

Human-Computer Interaction
The Effects of Generative AI on Computing Students' Help-Seeking Preferences

Irene Hou,Sophia Metille,Zhuo Li,Owen Man,Cynthia Zastudil,Stephen MacNeil

2024-01-04

Abstract:Help-seeking is a critical way for students to learn new concepts, acquire new skills, and get unstuck when problem-solving in their computing courses. The recent proliferation of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, offers students a new source of help that is always available on-demand. However, it is unclear how this new resource compares to existing help-seeking resources along dimensions of perceived quality, latency, and trustworthiness. In this paper, we investigate the help-seeking preferences and experiences of computing students now that generative AI tools are available to them. We collected survey data (n=47) and conducted interviews (n=8) with computing students. Our results suggest that although these models are being rapidly adopted, they have not yet fully eclipsed traditional help resources. The help-seeking resources that students rely on continue to vary depending on the task and other factors. Finally, we observed preliminary evidence about how help-seeking with generative AI is a skill that needs to be developed, with disproportionate benefits for those who are better able to harness the capabilities of LLMs. We discuss potential implications for integrating generative AI into computing classrooms and the future of help-seeking in the era of generative AI.

Human-Computer Interaction
Is Generative AI an Existential Threat to Human Creatives? Insights from Financial Economics

Jiasun Li

2024-07-29

Abstract:With the phenomenal rise of generative AI models (e.g., large language models such as GPT or large image models such as Diffusion), there are increasing concerns about human creatives' futures. Specifically, as generative models' power further increases, will they eventually replace all human creatives' jobs? We argue that the answer is "no," even if existing generative AI models' capabilities reach their theoretical limit. Our theory has a close analogy to a familiar insight in financial economics on the impossibility of an informationally efficient market [Grossman and Stiglitz (1980)]: If generative AI models can provide all the content humans need at low variable costs, then there is no incentive for humans to spend costly resources on content creation as they cannot profit from it. But if no human creates new content, then generative AI can only learn from stale information and be unable to generate up-to-date content that reflects new happenings in the physical world. This creates a paradox.

Human-Computer Interaction,Artificial Intelligence
Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life

Zhicheng Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230658

IF: 3.5

2023-08-24

Royal Society Open Science

Abstract:Generative artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs), is poised to transform scientific research, enabling researchers to elevate their research productivity. This article presents a how-to guide for employing LLMs in academic settings, focusing on their unique strengths, constraints and implications through the lens of philosophy of science and epistemology. Using ChatGPT as a case study, I identify and elaborate on three attributes contributing to its effectiveness—intelligence, versatility and collaboration—accompanied by tips on crafting effective prompts, practical use cases and a living resource online (https://osf.io/8vpwu/). Next, I evaluate the limitations of generative AI and its implications for ethical use, equality and education. Regarding ethical and responsible use, I argue from technical and epistemic standpoints that there is no need to restrict the scope or nature of AI assistance, provided that its use is transparently disclosed. A pressing challenge, however, lies in detecting fake research, which can be mitigated by embracing open science practices, such as transparent peer review and sharing data, code and materials. Addressing equality, I contend that while generative AI may promote equality for some, it may simultaneously exacerbate disparities for others—an issue with potentially significant yet unclear ramifications as it unfolds. Lastly, I consider the implications for education, advocating for active engagement with LLMs and cultivating students' critical thinking and analytical skills. The how-to guide seeks to empower researchers with the knowledge and resources necessary to effectively harness generative AI while navigating the complex ethical dilemmas intrinsic to its application.

multidisciplinary sciences
The Impact of Generative AI on Human Productivity in Creative Writing

Vinay Bhimavarapu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4780

2023-08-31

Journal of Student Research

Abstract:With the innovative field of generative artificial intelligence having advanced at an incredibly rapid rate, its applications are of the utmost priority to study. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not generative AI can help increase human productivity, specifically in writing. We hypothesized that generative AI will have a positive impact on human productivity. In order to test this, we employed the use of participants to write short fictional stories, one with the help of AI and one without. They were provided with survey questions that helped assess any changes in productivity levels. The productivity of the participants was also analyzed in terms of grammar, spelling, and consistency while compared against time . With the results obtained, we hoped to assess how AI can impact productivity in creative tasks (i.e., writing, art). We also hoped to understand its broader applications for human use and potential benefits and caveats to using generative AI. Based on the results, we concluded that using generative AI did indeed improve writing productivity as it lowered the amount of errors and shortened the time taken. However, how productive the individual was in producing quality work of their own merit also depended on how much work they delegated to the generative AI as well as how they perceived it.
Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education

Samar Aad,Mariann Hardey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-02-2024-0043

2024-09-07

Quality Assurance in Education

Abstract:Purpose Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has seen exponential growth in recent years due to its capability to generate original content through natural language processing and comprehensive language models. This paper aims to investigate the transformative impact of GAI on higher education, focusing on the evolving roles of faculty in the classroom. Design/methodology/approach Using a phenomenological perspective and a process approach, the study involved 25 semi-structured interviews with academicians in higher education. Findings The findings reveal that GAI currently creates biased and commercially driven learning environments, challenging traditional pedagogical models. Despite its potential for enhancing education, the autonomous nature of GAI often prioritizes commercial interests over pedagogical goals. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to faculty perspectives, suggesting future research should include student viewpoints and diverse educational contexts. Practical implications The study highlights the need for higher education institutions to develop comprehensive policies, provide training for faculty and students and design new courses that leverage GAI for personalized learning experiences and enhanced faculty research. Originality/value This paper contributes to the emerging literature on GAI's impact on education, highlighting its dual nature as both a transformative tool and a potential threat to traditional educational roles and outcomes.
Generative AI: An Existential Threat to Human Content Creators?

Jiasun Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4666860

2023-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:With the phenomenal rise of generative AI models (e.g., Large Language Models such as GPT or text-to-image models such as Stable Diffusion), there are increasing concerns about human content creators' future. Specifically, as generative models further advance, would they eventually take over the jobs of all human content creators? We argue that the answer is no, even if generative AI models can perform at their theoretical limit one day. Our theory has a close analogy to the familiar insight in financial economics on the impossibility of a perfectly informationally efficient market as in Grossman and Stiglitz (1980): If generative AI models can provide all the content that human needs at low variable costs, then there is no incentive for human content creators to spend resources on content creation as they cannot profit from it. But if no human creates new content, then generative AI models can only rehash what they already know and be unable to provide up-to-date answers. This creates a paradox.
Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: student adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions

Kong Chen,April C. Tallant,Ian Selig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-10-2023-0160

2024-07-04

Information and Learning Science

Abstract:Current knowledge and research on students' utilization and interaction with generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work is limited. This study aims to investigate students' engagement with these tools. This research used survey-based research to investigate generative AI literacy (utilization, interaction, evaluation of output and ethics) among students enrolled in a four-year public university in the southeastern USA. This article focuses on the respondents who have used generative AI (218; 47.2%). Most respondents used generative AI to generate ideas for papers, projects or assignments, and they also used AI to assist with their original ideas. Despite their use of AI assistance, most students were critical of generative AI output, and this mindset was reflected in their reported interactions with ChatGPT. Respondents expressed a need for explicit guidance from course syllabi and university policies regarding generative AI's ethical and appropriate use. Literature related to generative AI use in higher education specific to ChatGPT is predominantly from educators' viewpoints. This study provides empirical evidence about how university students report using generative AI in the context of generative AI literacy.
Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper dive

Ziv Epstein,Aaron Hertzmann,Laura Herman,Robert Mahari,Morgan R. Frank,Matthew Groh,Hope Schroeder,Amy Smith,Memo Akten,Jessica Fjeld,Hany Farid,Neil Leach,Alex Pentland,Olga Russakovsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451

2023-06-07

Abstract:A new class of tools, colloquially called generative AI, can produce high-quality artistic media for visual arts, concept art, music, fiction, literature, video, and animation. The generative capabilities of these tools are likely to fundamentally alter the creative processes by which creators formulate ideas and put them into production. As creativity is reimagined, so too may be many sectors of society. Understanding the impact of generative AI - and making policy decisions around it - requires new interdisciplinary scientific inquiry into culture, economics, law, algorithms, and the interaction of technology and creativity. We argue that generative AI is not the harbinger of art's demise, but rather is a new medium with its own distinct affordances. In this vein, we consider the impacts of this new medium on creators across four themes: aesthetics and culture, legal questions of ownership and credit, the future of creative work, and impacts on the contemporary media ecosystem. Across these themes, we highlight key research questions and directions to inform policy and beneficial uses of the technology.

Artificial Intelligence

Does generative AI help academics to do more or less?

Generative AI and the Automating of Academia

Generative artificial intelligence and academia: Implication for research, teaching and service

Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content

Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: an analysis of the perceptions of researchers in training

Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors

Generative AI: Challenges to higher education

Exploring the role of generative AI in academia: Opportunities and challenges

Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Write an Academic Journal Article? Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications

Generative AI and Its Educational Implications

Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI

Generative AI: is it a paradigm shift for higher education?

The Value, Benefits, and Concerns of Generative AI-Powered Assistance in Writing

The Effects of Generative AI on Computing Students' Help-Seeking Preferences

Is Generative AI an Existential Threat to Human Creatives? Insights from Financial Economics

Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life

The Impact of Generative AI on Human Productivity in Creative Writing

Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education

Generative AI: An Existential Threat to Human Content Creators?

Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: student adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions

Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper dive