Generative AI: An Existential Threat to Human Content Creators?

Jiasun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4666860
2023-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:With the phenomenal rise of generative AI models (e.g., Large Language Models such as GPT or text-to-image models such as Stable Diffusion), there are increasing concerns about human content creators' future. Specifically, as generative models further advance, would they eventually take over the jobs of all human content creators? We argue that the answer is no, even if generative AI models can perform at their theoretical limit one day. Our theory has a close analogy to the familiar insight in financial economics on the impossibility of a perfectly informationally efficient market as in Grossman and Stiglitz (1980): If generative AI models can provide all the content that human needs at low variable costs, then there is no incentive for human content creators to spend resources on content creation as they cannot profit from it. But if no human creates new content, then generative AI models can only rehash what they already know and be unable to provide up-to-date answers. This creates a paradox.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?