Bell's Theory of Beables and the Concept of `Universe'

Ian T. Durham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.02143
2018-05-06
Abstract:From its earliest days nearly a century ago, quantum mechanics has proven itself to be a tremendously accurate yet intellectually unsatisfying theory to many. Not the least of its problems is that it is a theory about the results of measurements. As John Bell once said in introducing the concept of `beables', it should be possible to say what is rather than merely what is observed. In this essay I consider the question of whether a universe can be a (nonlocal) beable and what that implies about the fundamental nature of that universe. I conclude that a universe that is a beable within the framework of certain theories, cannot also be fundamental.
History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?