Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Promoting cooperation by reputation-driven group formation

One step memory of group reputation is optimal to promote cooperation in public goods games

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Cooperative Emergence of Spatial Public Goods Games with Reputation Discount Accumulation

Reputation-based synergy and discounting mechanism promotes cooperation

Cooperation driven by success-driven group formation

Reputation-dependent social learning on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game

Role of reputation constraints in the spatial public goods game with second-order reputation evaluation

Do not aim too high nor too low: Moderate expectation-based group formation promotes public cooperation on networks

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Partner selections in public goods games with constant group size

Reputation-based Partner Choice among Mobile Players

The influence of environment-based reputation on cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Rational conformity behavior in social learning promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game

Role of Recommendation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Reputation-based discount effect in imitation on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games