The work performed through interprofessional meeting discourse: an observational study
Julia PaxinoElizabeth MolloyCharlotte DennistonRania AbdelmotalebRobyn Woodward-Krona Department of Medical Education,Melbourne Medical School,The University of Melbourne,Parkville,Australiab Department of Medicine,Dentistry and Health Sciences,The University of Melbourne,Parkville,Australiac Eastern Health Clinical School,Monash University,Clayton,AustraliaJulia Paxino has experience in healthcare research and has a background as a physiotherapist. She has recently submitted her PhD in the area of interprofessional communication in rehabilitation,and works as a research fellow in collaborative practice and health professions education. Julia has published her work in international peer reviewed journals and has presented at a number of local and international conferences.Elizabeth Molloy is Associate Dean,Learning and Teaching,in the Faculty of Medicine,Dentistry and Health Sciences. She is also Professor of Work Integrated Learning in the Department of Medical Education,Melbourne Medical School,at the University of Melbourne. She has extensive experience in healthcare research and started her career as a physiotherapist. She completed her PhD on feedback in clinical education and has published more than 115 peer reviewed journal articles,book chapters and books,with a focus on workplace learning,feedback,and assessment,interprofessional education and clinical supervisor professional development.Charlotte Denniston is a senior lecturer in Medical Education in the Department of Medical Education,University of Melbourne. She has experience in healthcare research and has a background as a physiotherapist. She completed her PhD in teaching and learning communication skills in the health professions and has over 10 scholarly outputs.Rania Abdelmotaleb is the Medical Director of Rehabilitation Medicine at Eastern Health and an adjunct senior lecturer at Eastern Health Clinical School Research (Monash University). She has extensive experience in qualitative and quantitative research in the field of rehabilitation research,including research conducted at Eastern Health.Robyn Woodward-Kron is the Director of Research Training in the Department of Medical Education,University of Melbourne. She is also Professor of Healthcare Communication,Department of Medical Education,University of Melbourne. She completed her PhD in educational linguistics and has over 100 research and scholarly outputs.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2343833
2024-04-29
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Abstract:The effectiveness of work performed through interprofessional practice is contingent on the nature and extent of communication between professionals. To date, there is little research exploring how the patterns of communication may impact interprofessional work. This study focused on communication during interprofessional meetings to better understand the interprofessional work performed through these encounters. Specifically, it examined how interactional discourse, that is, the patterns of language, influenced work performed during interprofessional meetings. A series of four interprofessional meetings in a rehabilitation unit were observed. Twenty-one participants were observed, including medical, nursing, allied health clinicians, and health professions students. Follow-up stimulated-recall interviews were conducted with five meeting participants. The data collection consisted of video and audio recordings and detailed field notes. Data were analyzed using a combination of genre analysis, a form of discourse analysis, and activity system analysis, drawing on Cultural Historical Activity Theory. This facilitated an in-depth examination of the structure of discourse and its influence on meeting outcomes. The meeting structure was defined and predictable. Two distinct forms of discourse were identified and labeled s cripted and unscripted . Scripted discourse was prompted by standardized documents and facilitated the completion of organizational work. In contrast, unscripted discourse was spontaneous dialogue used to co-construct knowledge and contributed to collaboration. There was constant shifting between scripted and unscripted discourse throughout meetings which was orchestrated by experienced clinicians. Rather than fragmenting the discussion, this shifting enabled shared decision making. This research provides further insights into the interprofessional work performed during interprofessional meetings. The scripted discourse was highly influenced by artifacts (communication tools) in meetings, and these were used to ensure organizational imperatives were met. Unscripted discourse facilitated not only new insights and decisions but also social cohesion that may influence work within and outside the meeting.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services