Abstract:Background: Individuals with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability (S-PMID) tend to function at the earlier stages of communication development. Variable and highly individual means of communicating may present challenges to the adults providing support in everyday life. The current study aimed to examine the communication interface between students with S-PMID and educational staff. Method: An in-depth, observational study of dyadic interaction in a class within the secondary part of a special school was conducted. The designated educational level was Key Stage 3 under the National Curriculum of England, which is typically for children from age 11 to 14 years attending a state school. There were four student-teacher dyads in the class. The students had multiple impairments with severely limited communication skills. Video capture of dyadic interaction was conducted during five English lessons and sampled to 2.5 min per dyad per lesson. The video footage was transcribed into standard orthography, detailing the vocal and non-vocal aspects. A coding framework guided by the principles of structural-functional linguistics was used to determine the nature of dyadic interaction, comprising linguistic moves, functions and communicative modalities. The relative contributions of student and teacher to the interaction were examined. Results: Significant differences were found between the students and educational staff on the majority of the measures. The teachers dominated the interaction, occupying significantly more turns than the students. Teacher turns contained significantly more initiations and follow-up moves than the students, who used more response moves. Teacher communication mainly served the functions of requesting and information giving. Feedback and scripted functions were also significantly greater among teacher turns, with only limited occurrence among the students. Self- or shared-expression was greatest among the students. The modalities of speech, touch, singing and objects were used by the teachers for the purpose of communication, whereas vocalisation and gesture were used by the students. Conclusions: Despite differences in the availability of communication skills, both student and teacher were able to make their respective contributions to the interaction during classroom activity. Features of the student-teacher interface retained critical features seen in studies of more able individuals with intellectual disability. Scaffolding provided by teachers appears to be relevant to the communicative contributions of individuals functioning at the earliest stages of communication. The coding framework based on structural-functional linguistics provides some new potential for examining and enhancing the communication interface between individuals with S-PMID and the people who support them.

“Institutional talk” in the discourse between an educational psychologist and a parent: a single case study employing mixed research methods

On the use of Conversation Analysis and retrospection in intervention for children with language impairment

A Discourse on Academic Discourse

Strategic discourse production and parent involvement: including parent knowledge and practices in the Lead My Learning campaign

Examination of the communication interface between students with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability and educational staff during structured teaching sessions

Incorporating Parents' Lived Experiences Into the Pediatric Audiology Course: A Qualitative Analysis of Student Reflections

IDEA and collaboration: a Bakhtinian perspective on parent and professional discourse

Disabling language practices: discursive constructions of children in individual education plan resource documents

An Interprofessional Graduate Student and Family Coaching Program in Naturalistic Communication Techniques

Working with the parents and families of children with developmental language disorders: An international perspective

Linguistic Capital and Home-School Relationships: Mothers' Interactions with their Children's Primary School Teachers

Discourses/2. Ireland: Listening to Children’s Voices in Irish Social Work through Cultural and Organisational Filters

What do speech-language pathologists do to support families' active involvement in early intervention? Exploring moment-to-moment interactions in sessions

Mixed Methods in International Collaborative Research: The Experiences of the International Study of Parents, Children, and Schools

A qualitative case study in the social capital of co-professional collaborative co-practice for children with speech, language and communication needs

Parent-Educator Partnerships in Special Education Services Provision: A Thematic Exploration of Challenges Faced by Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Families

"It doesn't matter if we're the most amazing professionals in the world..." A qualitative study of professionals' perspectives on parent-child interaction assessment with deaf infants

Meaning of language differences between doctors and educators in a collaborative discourse

Assessing a (gifted) child in parent-teacher conference

Teacher communities as a context for professional learning: a preschool case study

Toward Integrating Research on Parent-Child Emotion Talk and Linguistic Theory: A Spotlight on Parents’ (In)direct Communication