The work performed through interprofessional meeting discourse: an observational study

Julia PaxinoElizabeth MolloyCharlotte DennistonRania AbdelmotalebRobyn Woodward-Krona Department of Medical Education,Melbourne Medical School,The University of Melbourne,Parkville,Australiab Department of Medicine,Dentistry and Health Sciences,The University of Melbourne,Parkville,Australiac Eastern Health Clinical School,Monash University,Clayton,AustraliaJulia Paxino has experience in healthcare research and has a background as a physiotherapist. She has recently submitted her PhD in the area of interprofessional communication in rehabilitation,and works as a research fellow in collaborative practice and health professions education. Julia has published her work in international peer reviewed journals and has presented at a number of local and international conferences.Elizabeth Molloy is Associate Dean,Learning and Teaching,in the Faculty of Medicine,Dentistry and Health Sciences. She is also Professor of Work Integrated Learning in the Department of Medical Education,Melbourne Medical School,at the University of Melbourne. She has extensive experience in healthcare research and started her career as a physiotherapist. She completed her PhD on feedback in clinical education and has published more than 115 peer reviewed journal articles,book chapters and books,with a focus on workplace learning,feedback,and assessment,interprofessional education and clinical supervisor professional development.Charlotte Denniston is a senior lecturer in Medical Education in the Department of Medical Education,University of Melbourne. She has experience in healthcare research and has a background as a physiotherapist. She completed her PhD in teaching and learning communication skills in the health professions and has over 10 scholarly outputs.Rania Abdelmotaleb is the Medical Director of Rehabilitation Medicine at Eastern Health and an adjunct senior lecturer at Eastern Health Clinical School Research (Monash University). She has extensive experience in qualitative and quantitative research in the field of rehabilitation research,including research conducted at Eastern Health.Robyn Woodward-Kron is the Director of Research Training in the Department of Medical Education,University of Melbourne. She is also Professor of Healthcare Communication,Department of Medical Education,University of Melbourne. She completed her PhD in educational linguistics and has over 100 research and scholarly outputs.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2343833
2024-04-29
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Abstract:The effectiveness of work performed through interprofessional practice is contingent on the nature and extent of communication between professionals. To date, there is little research exploring how the patterns of communication may impact interprofessional work. This study focused on communication during interprofessional meetings to better understand the interprofessional work performed through these encounters. Specifically, it examined how interactional discourse, that is, the patterns of language, influenced work performed during interprofessional meetings. A series of four interprofessional meetings in a rehabilitation unit were observed. Twenty-one participants were observed, including medical, nursing, allied health clinicians, and health professions students. Follow-up stimulated-recall interviews were conducted with five meeting participants. The data collection consisted of video and audio recordings and detailed field notes. Data were analyzed using a combination of genre analysis, a form of discourse analysis, and activity system analysis, drawing on Cultural Historical Activity Theory. This facilitated an in-depth examination of the structure of discourse and its influence on meeting outcomes. The meeting structure was defined and predictable. Two distinct forms of discourse were identified and labeled s cripted and unscripted . Scripted discourse was prompted by standardized documents and facilitated the completion of organizational work. In contrast, unscripted discourse was spontaneous dialogue used to co-construct knowledge and contributed to collaboration. There was constant shifting between scripted and unscripted discourse throughout meetings which was orchestrated by experienced clinicians. Rather than fragmenting the discussion, this shifting enabled shared decision making. This research provides further insights into the interprofessional work performed during interprofessional meetings. The scripted discourse was highly influenced by artifacts (communication tools) in meetings, and these were used to ensure organizational imperatives were met. Unscripted discourse facilitated not only new insights and decisions but also social cohesion that may influence work within and outside the meeting.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore communication patterns in Interprofessional Meetings (IPMs) and their impact on work. Specifically, the study focuses on the interactional discourse of rehabilitation teams during IPMs and analyzes how this discourse affects the work conducted in these meetings. #### Main Research Questions: 1. **What are the discourse patterns and interactions in IPMs?** - The study uses observational methods to identify and analyze specific discourse patterns and forms of interaction among rehabilitation teams during IPMs. 2. **How does discourse in IPMs affect the completion of actual work?** - By analyzing discourse patterns, the study seeks to understand how these discourses facilitate or hinder the completion of actual work tasks. ### Research Background and Methods - **Research Background**: Interprofessional practice is a key principle of effective healthcare, but its implementation faces numerous challenges. Existing research mainly focuses on self-reports, neglecting the contextual influences. Observational methods can provide more insights into how work is accomplished through communication and interaction. - **Methodological Framework**: The study employs Genre Theory and Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) as analytical tools. Genre Theory is used to identify functional stages and linguistic features in meetings; CHAT is used to analyze factors within the activity system and their interactions. - **Design**: A qualitative research method was adopted, including participatory observation and stimulated recall interviews. Video, audio data, and detailed notes were collected for systematic analysis of the meetings. ### Summary of Results - **Meeting Structure and Participant Roles**: Meetings have a clear and predictable structure, divided into formal and informal stages. The formal stage follows a standardized document format to discuss patient cases, while the informal stage involves brief chats and discussions about patient treatment plans. - **Scripted and Unscripted Discourse**: The study identified two distinct forms of discourse: scripted discourse (driven by standardized documents) and unscripted discourse (spontaneous conversations). Scripted discourse helps accomplish organizational tasks, while unscripted discourse promotes knowledge co-construction and social cohesion. ### Significance This study provides in-depth insights into how discourse in IPMs affects work. Scripted discourse, influenced by communication tools in meetings, ensures organizational goals are met; unscripted discourse not only brings new insights and decisions but also enhances team social cohesion, positively impacting work both within and outside the meetings.