Abstract:Ultrasound probe quality assurance is an underserved and underregulated area in medical imaging. While several testing methods exist, their availability and adoption remains varied, and the frequency of testing is often insufficient. Here we aimed to conduct a user-driven simple and rapid probe quality testing approach and to evaluate its rationale. Testing was based on physical examination of probe integrity (all probes) and in-air reverberation check (for curvilinear and linear array probes), findings, as well as probe age were registered. Prior to assessment, probes were divided into a high-risk vs. a low-risk category, based on the perceived risk of probe damage as a result of the typical application (e.g., non-invasive vs. interventional, inpatient vs. point-of-care). 17.4% of the low-risk and 31.4% of high-risk probes demonstrated physical wear or damage. Reverberation artifacts were significantly more frequent (68%) in the high-risk category vs. the low-risk one (29.4%). Probes with either physical or reverberation faults were significantly older on average. The simple, rapid investigational technique uncovered an alarming percentage of probe damage or faults. It also identified immediately solvable technical issues (e.g., poor cable contact mimicking dropout). High-risk probe usage resulted in an increased rate of reverberation errors and physical damage. Risk-based, frequent rapid observational testing of ultrasound probes could substantially improve both diagnostic quality and patient safety. Die Qualitätssicherung von Ultraschallsonden ist ein unterregulierter Bereich in der medizinischen Bildgebung. Zwar gibt es verschiedene Testmethoden, ihre Verfügbarkeit und Akzeptanz ist jedoch unterschiedlich, und die Testhäufigkeit ist nicht ausreichend. Unser Ziel war es, einen einfachen und schnellen Qualitätstest-Ansatz durchzuführen und dessen Begründung zu bewerten. Die Tests basierten auf einer Untersuchung der Sondenintegrität (alle Sonden) und einer Überprüfung des Echoverlusts (konvexe und lineare Sonden). Die Ergebnisse sowie das Sondenalter wurden registriert. Vor der Bewertung wurden die Sonden subjektiv in eine Kategorie mit hohem und niedrigem Risiko eingeteilt, basierend auf dem wahrgenommenen Risiko einer Sondenschädigung aufgrund ihrer typischen Anwendung (z.B. nicht invasiv vs. interventionell, stationär vs. Point-of-Care). 17,4% der Schallköpfe mit geringem und 31,4% der Sonden mit hohem Risiko wiesen physische Abnutzung oder Schäden auf. Echoverlusts waren in der Hochrisiko-Kategorie häufiger (68%) als in der niedrigeren Risikokategorie (29,4%). Sonden mit physikalischen oder Echofehlern waren im Durchschnitt älter. Die einfache Untersuchungstechnik deckte einen alarmierenden Prozentsatz an Sondenschäden oder -fehlern auf. Außerdem wurden lösbare technische Probleme aufgedeckt (z.B. Ausfall wegen schlechten Kabelkontakts). Sonden in der Hochrisiko-Kategorie wiesen mehr physikalische oder Echofehler auf. Risikobasierte, häufige, schnelle Beobachtungstests von Ultraschallsonden könnten sowohl die diagnostische Qualität als auch die Patientensicherheit verbessern. Received: 23 March 2024 Accepted after revision: 30 August 2024 Article published online: 06 November 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Neutrino mixing and leptogenesis in the type II seesaw mechanism

SU-FF-T-174: A New Device for the Verification of Temporal Function of the 4DCT and Gating Delivery System

Objective image quality assurance in cone‐beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies

Commissioning and implementing a Quality Assurance program for dedicated radiation oncology MRI scanners

Drug therapy of chronic heart failure in the elderly: the current state of clinical-trial evidence

A Novel Objective Method for Assessing High-Contrast Spatial Resolution in CT Based on the Rayleigh Criterion.

Design and simulation of a 2-D array flexible ultrasound transducer system for tissue characterization – A pilot study

Preliminary Research on Quality Control of PACS Image Display Device

Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography

Development of an Estimation Instrument of Acoustic Lens Properties for Medical Ultrasound Transducers

Automated Quality Control Solution for Radiographic Imaging of Lung Diseases

Development and Longitudinal Analysis of Plan-Based Streamlined Quality Assurance on Multiple Positioning Guidance Systems With Single Phantom Setup

Comparative Approach to Performance Estimation of Pulsed Wave Doppler Equipment Based on Kiviat Diagram

QM and QC Testing of CT Scanners

Identical Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Elekta and Varian Machines

Performance of three model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms using a CT task-based image quality metric

MR‐linac daily semi‐automated end‐to‐end quality control verification

Equipment, measurement and dose—a survey for therapeutic ultrasound

WE‐E‐141‐06: Identical Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Elekte and Varian Machines

AutoMRISimQA: an automated system for daily quality control of a 3T MRI simulator

Risk-based ultrasound probe quality assurance – a single center proof-of-concept study