Lamprecht-Tate Formula

Sazzad Ali Biswas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.04286

2019-05-01

Abstract:For multiplicative characters of a non-Archimedean local field, we have a formula for epsilon factors due to John Tate. Before Tate, Erich Lamprecht also gave a formula for local epsilon factors of linear characters. Then Tate generalizes the formula for epsilon factors. In this paper, we give a very short and neat proof of the Lamprecht-Tate formula. We also show that the famous twisting formula of Deligne is a special case of the Lamprecht-Tate formula.

Number Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to provide a concise and rigorous proof to verify the Lamprecht - Tate formula and show that the well - known Deligne twisting formula is a special case of the Lamprecht - Tate formula. Specifically, Lamprecht and Tate respectively gave different formulas for the local epsilon - factor, and this paper aims to unify these formulas and prove the relationship between them.

### Background Introduction

For the multiplicative character of a non - Archimedean local field \(F\), John Tate proposed a formula for the epsilon - factor. Before Tate, Erich Lamprecht also gave a formula for the local epsilon - factor of a linear character. Tate generalized this formula in [8], which is called the Lamprecht - Tate formula. The main contribution of this paper is to give a very concise proof of the Lamprecht - Tate formula and show that Deligne's twisting formula is a special case of this formula.

### Main Problems

1. **Prove the Lamprecht - Tate formula**:
- The author provides a concise proof of the Lamprecht - Tate formula (Theorem 3.1).
- Specifically, for a non - Archimedean local field \(F\), let \(\chi\) be a character of \(F^{\times}\) with conductor \(a(\chi)\), and let \(m\) be a natural number satisfying \(2m\leq a(\chi)\), and \(\psi\) be a non - trivial additive character of \(F\). Then there exists \(c\in F^{\times}\) such that \(\nu_F(c)=a(\chi)+n(\psi)\), and we have:
\[
\chi(1 + y)=\psi(c^{-1}y)\quad\text{for all}\;y\in P_{F}^{a(\chi)-m}
\]
For such \(c\), we have:
\[
\epsilon(\chi,\psi)=\chi(c)\cdot q_F^{-\frac{a(\chi)- 2m}{2}}\sum_{x\in U_m^F/U_{a(\chi)-m}^F}\chi^{-1}(x)\psi(c^{-1}x)
\]

2. **Show that the Deligne twisting formula is a special case of the Lamprecht - Tate formula**:
- Through Corollary 3.2, the author shows that when \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are characters of \(F^{\times}\) and satisfy \(a(\alpha)\geq2\cdot a(\beta)\), the Deligne twisting formula holds:
\[
\epsilon(\alpha\beta,\psi)=\beta(c)\cdot\epsilon(\alpha,\psi)
\]
where \(c\in F^{\times}\) satisfies \(\nu_F(c)=a(\chi)+n(\psi)\), and for all \(x\in F^{\times}\) with \(2\cdot\nu_F(x)\geq a(\alpha)\), we have:
\[
\alpha(1 + x)=\psi(x/c)
\]

### Summary

The main objective of this paper is to verify the Lamprecht - Tate formula by concise proof methods and show its relationship with the Deligne twisting formula, thereby contributing to the study of local ep