Abstract:The aim of this essay is to elaborate philosophical and ethical underpinnings of posthumous diagnosis of famous historical figures based on literary and artistic products, or commonly called retrospective diagnosis. It discusses ontological and epistemic challenges raised in the humanities and social sciences, and attempts to systematically reply to their criticisms from the viewpoint of clinical medicine, philosophy of medicine, particularly the ontology of disease and the epistemology of diagnosis, and medical ethics. The ontological challenge focuses on the doubt about the persistence of a disease over historical time, whereas the epistemic challenge disputes the inaccessibility of scientific verification of a diagnosis in the past. I argue that the critics are in error in conflating the taxonomy of disease (nosology) and the act of diagnosing a patient. Medical diagnosis is fundamentally a hypothesis-construction and an explanatory device that can be generated under various degrees of uncertainty and limited amount of information. It is not an apodictic judgment (true or false) as the critics presuppose, but a probabilistic (Bayesian) judgment with varying degrees of plausibility under uncertainty. In order to avoid this confusion, I propose that retrospective diagnosis of a historical figure be syndromic without identifying underlying disease, unless there is justifiable reason for such specification. Moreover it should be evaluated not only from the viewpoint of medical science but also in a larger context of the scholarship of the humanities and social sciences by its overall plausibility and consistency. On the other hand, I will endorse their concerns regarding the ethics and professionalism of retrospective diagnosis, and call for the need for situating such a diagnosis in an interdisciplinary scope and the context of the scholarship of the historical figure. I will then enumerate several important caveats for interdisciplinary retrospective diagnosis using an example of the retrospective diagnosis of Socrates for his life-long intermittent neurologic symptoms. Finally, I will situate the present argument in a larger context of the major debate among the historians of medicine and paleopathologists, and discuss the similarities and differences.

The logic of diagnosis: Peirce, literary narrative, and the history of present illness

Diagnosis: What Is the Structure of Its Reasoning?

The Entanglement of Psychologism and Logicism-To Review the Intellectual History of the Relevant Disputations between E. Husserl and W. Wundt

Diagnosing the "master mechanism of the universe" in interwar and war-era America

A theory of diagnosis from first principles

Retrospective diagnosis of a famous historical figure: ontological, epistemic, and ethical considerations

Diagnosing Shosha: literature as a lens to view disease and history

Inferences of clinical diagnostic reasoning and diagnostic error

Sense‐making and hermeneutical injustice following a psychiatric diagnosis

Beyond Diagnosis - the Phenomenology of Schizophrenia

The influence of context on diagnostic reasoning: A narrative synthesis of experimental findings

Anatomy of diagnosis in a clinical encounter: how clinicians discuss uncertainty with patients

Examining the Influence of Context and Professional Culture on Clinical Reasoning Through Rhetorical-Narrative Analysis

'The Explanation You Have Been Looking For': Neurobiology as Promise and Hermeneutic Closure

Four Core Concepts in Psychiatric Diagnosis

Diagnostic Reasoning and Cognitive Biases of Nurse Practitioners

From hermeneutics to heteroglossia: 'The Patient's View' revisited

The Power of Images and the Logics of Discovery in Psychiatric Care

Diagnosis and Reality: A Noun is A Terrible Thing to Waste

Investigation on the Writing Problems of the History of Present Illness

Schizophrenia, the very idea: On self-disorder, hyperreflexivity, and the diagnostic concept