Abstract:Background and Aims Communication is important in determining how patients understand the diagnostic process. Empirical studies involving direct observation of communication within diagnostic processes are relatively limited. This ethnographic study aimed to identify communicative practices facilitating or inhibiting shared understanding between patients and doctors in UK acute secondary care settings. Methods Data were collected in acute medical sectors of three English hospitals. Researchers observed doctors as they assessed patients; semistructured interviews were undertaken with doctors and patients directly afterwards. Patients were also interviewed 2–4 weeks later. Case studies of individual encounters (consisting of these interviews and observational notes) were created, and were cross‐examined by an interdisciplinary team to identify divergence and convergence between doctors' and patients' narratives. These data were analysed thematically. Results We conducted 228 h of observation, 24 doctor interviews, 32 patient interviews and 15 patient follow‐up interviews. Doctors varied in their communication. Patient diagnostic understanding was sometimes misaligned with that of their doctors; interviews revealed that they often made incorrect assumptions to make sense of the fragmented information received. Thematic analysis identified communicative practices that seemed to facilitate, or inhibit, shared diagnostic understanding between patient and doctor, revealing three themes: (1) communicating what has been understood from the medical record, (2) sharing the thought process and diagnostic reasoning and (3) closing the loop and discharge communication. Shared understanding was best fostered by clear communication about the diagnostic process, what had already been done and what was achievable in acute settings. Written information presents an underutilised tool in such communication. Conclusions In UK acute secondary settings, the provision of more information about the diagnostic process often fostered shared understanding between doctor and patient, helping to minimise the confusion and dissatisfaction that can result from misaligned expectations or conclusions about the diagnosis, and the uncertainty therein. Patient/Public Contribution A patient and public involvement group (of a range of ages and backgrounds) was consulted. They contributed to the design of the protocol, including the timing of interviews, the acceptability of a follow‐up telephone interview, the development of the interview guides and the participant information sheets.

Anatomy of diagnosis in a clinical encounter: how clinicians discuss uncertainty with patients

When patients demur: Resisting diagnostic closure in US primary care

Formulations in Psychotherapy: Admission Interviews and the Conversational Construction of Diagnosis

How and why do doctors communicate diagnostic uncertainty: An experimental vignette study

Identifying Facilitators and Inhibitors of Shared Understanding: An Ethnography of Diagnosis Communication in Acute Medical Settings

[Consultation. Considerations on the practice of medical consultation]

When a Diagnosis Has No Name: Uncertainty and Opportunity

Developing methods to identify resilience and improve communication about diagnosis in pediatric primary care

Lessons in clinical reasoning - pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of persistent dysphagia and patient partnership

Clinical Interviewing: An Essential but Neglected Method of Medicine

Cognitive Bias in the Patient Encounter: Part I. Background and significance

Diagnostic reasoning and cognitive error in emergency medicine: Implications for teaching and learning

The diagnostic certainty levels of junior clinicians: A retrospective cohort study

Communication challenges for experienced clinicians: topics for an advanced communication curriculum

The influence of context on diagnostic reasoning: A narrative synthesis of experimental findings

Using a Socratic dialogue to tackle thorny issues of psychiatry

Reflections on Diagnosis and Diagnostic Errors: a Survey of Internal Medicine Resident and Attending Physicians

Inferences of clinical diagnostic reasoning and diagnostic error

Companion responses to diagnosis in Chinese outpatient clinical interaction

Towards Conversational Diagnostic AI

Introduction to Oral Medicine and Oral Diagnosis