The new union strategy. Turning the community against you

Richard Haugh

Abstract:They're called corporate campaigns, and unlike traditional union organizing efforts, their aim is to tarnish a hospital's relationship with its community by questioning its mission, tax-exempt status and quality of care. The campaigns can be brutal and relentless, and as hospital executives from Connecticut to California will attest, they can even get personal.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Triad's new market strategy: a threat to community hospitals

Beth Horning

Abstract:Faced with unprecedented financial pressures, many nonprofit hospitals today contemplate hooking up with large corporations and converting to for-profit status. In the deals that result, the talk is largely about stock value and the interests of investors. The larger public-interest question of how the conversion will affect the health of community members often receives short shift. Most recently, Triad, an HCA spin-off, has emerged as a major player in the market for faltering nonprofits, zeroing in on institutions all the way from Alaska to North Carolina, and this has advocates worried, because the company can be singularly insensitive to community health care needs. But Triad is also remarkably adept at winning public favor. In this States of Health, we'll look at the broader public policy questions raised by such corporate health ventures, questions that point to the need for stronger oversight and regulatory mechanisms to assure that the public interest is protected in our increasingly market-driven health system.
The Battle Between Activist Hedge Funds and Labor Unions

Xu Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101502

IF: 3.025

2024-05-24

Journal of Empirical Finance

Abstract:Activist hedge funds are more likely to target unionized firms. When they do, the short- term stock performance is higher, especially when the hedge funds' targeting strategy is hostile. Employees and labor organizations at target firms tend to oppose activist hedge funds. Firms are more likely to unionize after being targeted by hedge funds, and employee satisfaction deteriorates at target firms. Moreover, unionized firms are more likely to strike after being targeted, and those strikes in opposition to hedge fund intervention are more severe and more detrimental to the firms. This paper further explores potential costs and harmful consequences to the firm value due to the tension between activist hedge funds and labor unions. After being targeted, unionized firms tend to have lower profitability, weakened corporate governance, exposure to a higher degree of competitive and product market threats, and a higher crash risk in stock prices.

economics,business, finance
Resident Unions: Why Now and Will They Change Medical Education and Health Care?

David Sklar,Britani Javed

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005902

2024-10-18

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, resident unions proliferated. While unionization resulted in increased compensation and benefits, the process of union negotiations may have created adversarial relationships between residents and their institutions' leadership, who residents depend on for supervision and the development of clinical expertise. Such adversarial relationships could affect the learning environment, which is critical to the delivery of high-quality care. In this commentary, the authors suggest that academic medical centers should offer residents an authentic seat at the institutional care delivery leadership table, ensuring residents' full participation in key organizational decisions. Doing so represents an alternative to unionization, with its potentially adversarial relationships, while still achieving a key goal of residents-to be included in the decisions that affect them and the care they provide. In this way, residents can use their unique understanding of the institutions' strengths and weaknesses to improve the quality of patient care and the learning environment. Such engagement can also help residents achieve competence in systems-based practice and provide a vital link between institutions and the patients and community they serve through health policy and advocacy activities.
Rejecting conventional wisdom: how academic medical centers can regain their leadership positions

K Krauss,J Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199707000-00008

Abstract:Academic medical centers (i.e., medical schools and their principal hospitals) are following very similar strategies in attempts to secure their futures. It is likely that these undifferentiated strategies will fail, since most of them have been copied from the lower-cost, geographically better-positioned hospitals and health systems. Despite a wealth of innovative, entrepreneurial talent and the potential to reshape the world that AMCs live in, most AMCs are in reactive modes. Future directions and strategies are almost always shaped, forced, and justified by external pressures. The major problem with the strategic plans of most AMCs is that they are based on conventional industry wisdom. Strategic plans tend not to be analytically driven. The insight and understanding of those factors that drive the demand for AMCs' services and determine the performances of AMCs are lacking. The authors note some questions that are critical to the formulation of strategies for AMCs. For example, how can the research mission be changed from a cost-based to a value-based endeavor? Most AMCs cannot answer these questions, and if they do address them in the planning process, they do so superficially. Several examples of the factors that need to be understood are also given, such as patients' purposes and needs in seeking specialty care. Alternative strategies are listed, such as maintaining and exploiting the economic irrationality of the market rather than acting as if it were economically rational or forcing it to become so. Last, the authors outline the scope of the changes that are required and urge AMCs to reject conventional wisdom, determine their own unique situations, and work from there.
Don’t Fear the Union: Successful Management in a Unionized Library

Robert P. Holley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.2006990

2022-01-02

Journal of Library Administration

Abstract:Managers should not fear working in a unionized library. Unionization is higher in the nonprofit sector where managers do not feel the same economic pressures to maximize profits and to achieve the best possible results as in the corporate world. The union contract provides advantages including routinizing decisions, lessening the manager’s ability to make bad decisions, providing another feedback loop, and improving employee morale by giving workers some control over their working conditions. While management seldom bargains away the right to make key decisions, the union normally establishes rules that strengthen due process in key areas like firing. Contract negotiation is a critical step where both sides work toward a mutually acceptable agreement. Before accepting a position in a unionized library, managers should ask about union relations and examine their own leadership style to determine if they can manage in an environment where cooperation and following due process are essential.
Corporate cultures. Turning "us versus them" into "we"

J L Sherer

1994-05-05

Abstract:Health care executives are coming around to the philosophy that shared values--and shared corporate culture--represent the number one success factor in any merger. In fact, studies have documented merger failures in cases in which corporate culture issues have been ignored. The question is: How can executives--and organizations--overcome the cultural obstacles?
Organized Labor as the New Undeserving Rich?: Mass Media, Class-Based Anti-Union Rhetoric and Public Support for Unions in the United States

John V. Kane,Benjamin J. Newman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341700014X

2019-10-07

British Journal of Political Science

Abstract:Labor unions play a prominent role in the economy and in politics, and have long been depicted by opponents as an overly powerful, corrupt and economically harmful institution. In labor-related news in recent years, anti-union rhetoric has regularly focused on union workers themselves, frequently portraying them as overpaid, greedy and undeserving of their wealth, while also drawing a contrast between the compensation of union vs. non-union workers. This type of rhetoric is referred to here as class-based anti-union rhetoric (CAR). Despite its prevalence, it remains unknown whether CAR affects public opinion toward unions. This study uses a series of national survey experiments to demonstrate that exposure to CAR reduces the perceived similarity of targeted union workers, unions' perceived deservingness of public support and support for pro-union legislation. Moreover, CAR repeatedly nullified or reversed the otherwise positive relationship between the strength of worker identity and solidarity with union workers.

political science
Total Quality Management: Anti-Union Trojan Horse or Management Albatross?

Darren McCabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09500179922118178

1999-12-01

Abstract:This article examines a co-operative union-management approach towards Total Quality Management (TQM) by recourse to a case study from the auto components manufacturing sector. Its purpose is twofold; first, it suggests that in contrast to much critical thinking, under certain conditions TQM need not undermine trade unions. Indeed, it is argued that a more moderate trade union stance towards TQM, in some circumstances, may prove to be a more effective form of resistance than a militant one. Second, the article provides insights into the ways in which TQM reinforces existing power relations, hierarchical structures, organisational bureaucracy and inequality, rather than transforming them as TQM pundits contend. The argument, however, is not that TQM simply enhances management control in a unilinear fashion. This is because it not only poses dangers for trade unions, but also presents management with dilemmas and contradictions. TQM is understood, therefore, to be part of the continuing and complex effort by management to balance control and consent within employment, the dynamics, and outcomes of which, are uncertain and need to be empirically examined.
The health care market: can hospitals survive?

J C Goldsmith

Abstract:Does it sound familiar? Resources are scarce, competition is tough, and government regulations and a balanced budget are increasingly hard to meet at the same time. This is not the automobile or oil industry but the health care industry, and hospital managers are facing the same problems. And, maintains the author of this article, they must borrow some proven marketing techniques from business to survive in the new health care market. He first describes the features of the new market (the increasing economic power of physicians, new forms of health care delivery, prepaid health plans, and the changing regulatory environment) and then the possible marketing strategies for dealing with them (competing hard for physicians who control the patient flow and diversifying and promoting the mix of services). He also describes various planning solutions that make the most of a community's hospital facilities and affiliations.
Dual or dueling culture and commitment: The impact of a tri-hospital merger

Janice M Jones

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200304000-00009

Abstract:Objectives: This article addresses differences in RNs' commitment to their employing hospital versus the umbrella corporate organization, and the role of organizational culture during a tri-hospital merger. This study is the first to investigate the construct of dual commitment in healthcare organizations. Background: Fiscal restraints, decreasing reimbursement, and increasing competition have made organizational mergers and acquisitions prevalent. As corporate culture changes, organizational variables previously related to organizational commitment may no longer apply. Methods: RNs employed on general nursing units at 3 hospitals involved in a merger process completed 2 versions of Mowday's Organizational Commitment Questionnaire. Commitment to hospital and corporate system were examined. Semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and analysis of company documents assessed the organizational culture changes that have occurred. Results: Thirty-one percent of the nurses returned completed questionnaires; 9 were interviewed. RNs from the acquiring hospital demonstrated a significantly stronger commitment to the corporate system than the nurses from the acquired hospitals. The RNs at all 3 hospitals showed significantly greater commitment to their own particular hospital than to the umbrella corporate system. Conclusions: Moderate level of commitment reflected uncertainty of job status, work overload, and feelings of unappreciation. These attitudes prevent nurses from exerting efforts on behalf of the organization.
Going public: references to the news media in NHS contract negotiations

David Hughes,Lesley Griffiths

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00359

Abstract:This paper considers how middle-level managers in British Health Authorities and hospital Trusts orient to media reportage in the process of negotiating and monitoring contracts for clinical services. Although they sometimes produce media representations aimed at influencing the general public, local policy actors on both sides of the purchaser/provider split also use media messages as part of their negotiations with each other. We examine how they seek to manage negative publicity, and what happens when one side threatens to 'go public'. Managers must strike a balance between negotiating advantage and maintaining organisational relationships. Thus the powerful, but potentially double-edged, weapon of public disclosure was usually broached in indirect terms, and approached with some ambivalence. In rare cases, parties resorted to hostile press releases as relationships deteriorated. Arguably, these interactions reflect more general tensions that arise when managerial discourses, emphasising concepts such as adversarial contracting, markets and competition, are imported into professional organisations with a public service mission.
Competition, integration, and diversification: seven hospitals of Growthville, U.S.A

D B Starkweather

Abstract:Summing up across the three phases of this case, the pattern of evolution was (1) emergence of a market orientation by hospitals as the industry moved away from regulation; (2) steady expansion of what the hospitals considered to be their business, to include nonacute hospital and medical services as well as insurance, with vertical integration and concentric diversification serving as the vehicles for accomplishing this expansion; (3) remarkable change with respect to who was competing with whom, stemming from restructuring of hospital relationships away from open competition among many toward domination by a few; (4) a shift in the market from one of consumer choices among physicians and hospitals toward one of competitive choice among health plans; and (5) the emergence of negotiated pricing within the context of the new oligopoly, stemming from the heightened and organized power of corporate purchasers. Finally, we return to a concept presented in the introduction to this case: strategic alignment. The case has described the substantial realignment of our study hospitals to their new and changing environment. And it has highlighted their managers' use of boundary scanning, competitor analysis, and strategy to achieve this realignment. James Thompson's word for this process is "co-alignment," referring to "the most critical managerial function, and the skill closest to creativity." This case has illustrated this management skill, defined as "the discernment of hitherto unnoticed relationships in the complex environment, calculating their cause-effect relationships, and translating them into appropriate programs of action". This is both a summary of the performances of our case study managers and a powerful prescription for those who might face similar circumstances and challenges.
The internal processes and behavioral dynamics of hospital boards: an exploration of differences between high- and low-performing hospitals

Nancy M Kane,Jonathan R Clark,Howard L Rivenson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HMR.0000342980.30049.4b

Abstract:Background: Nonprofit hospital boards are under increasing pressure to improve financial, clinical, and charitable and community benefit performance. Most research on board effectiveness focuses on variables measuring board structure and attributes associated with competing ideal models of board roles. However, the results do not provide clear evidence that one role is superior to another and suggest that in practice boards pursue hybrid roles. Board dynamics and processes have received less attention from researchers, but emerging theoretical frameworks highlight them as key to effective corporate governance. Purpose: We explored differences in board processes and behavioral dynamics between financially high- and low-performing hospitals, with the goal of developing a better understanding of the best board practices in nonprofit hospitals. Methodology/approach: A comparative case study approach allowed for in-depth, qualitative assessments of how the internal workings of boards differ between low- and high-performing facilities. Findings: Boards of hospitals with strong financial performance exhibited behavioral dynamics and internal processes that differed in important ways from those of hospitals with poor financial performance. Practice implications: Boards need to actively attend to key processes and foster positive group dynamics in decision making to be more effective in governing hospitals.
Engaging doctors in the health care revolution

Thomas H Lee,Toby Cosgrove

Abstract:A health care revolution is under way, and doctors must be part of it. But many are deeply anxious and angry about the transformation, fearing loss of autonomy, respect, and income. Given their resistance, how can health system Leaders engage them in redesigning care? In this article, Dr. Thomas H. Lee, Press Ganey's chief medical officer, and Dr. Toby Cosgrove, the CEO of the Cleveland Clinic, describe a framework they've developed for encouraging buy-in. Adapting Max Weber's "typology of motives," and applying behavioral economics and other motivational principles, they describe four tactics leadership must apply in concert: engaging doctors in a noble shared purpose; addressing their economic self-interest; leveraging their desire for respect; and appealing to their sense of tradition. Drawing from experiences at the Mayo Clinic, Geisinger Health System, Partners HealthCare, the Cleveland Clinic, Ascension Health, and others, the authors show how the four motivational levers work together to bring this critical group of stakeholders on board.
The effects of corporate restructuring on hospital policymaking

J A Alexander,L L Morlock,B D Gifford

Abstract:Hospital corporate restructuring is the segmentation of assets or functions of the hospital into separate corporations. While these functions are almost always legally separated from the hospital, their impact on hospital policymaking may be far more direct. This study examines the effects of corporate restructuring by community hospitals on the structure, composition, and activity of hospital governing boards. In general, we expect that the policymaking function of the hospital will change to adapt to the multicorporate structure implemented under corporate restructuring, as well as the overlapping boards and diversified business responsibilities of the new corporate entity. Specifically, we hypothesize that the hospital board under corporate restructuring will conform more to the "corporate" model found in the business/industrial sector and less to the "philanthropic" model common to most community hospitals to date. Analysis of survey data from 1,037 hospitals undergoing corporate restructuring from 1979-1985 and a comparison group of 1,883 noncorporately restructured hospitals suggests general support for this hypothesis. Implications for health care governance and research are discussed.
Experiences With Unionization Among Surgical Resident Physicians, Faculty, and Staff

Darci C. Foote,Audrey E. Rosenblatt,Daniela Amortegui,Carmen M. Diaz,Brian C. Brajcich,Cary Jo R. Schlick,Karl Y. Bilimoria,Yue-Yung Hu,Julie K. Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21676

2024-07-18

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Importance Labor unions are a mechanism for employee advocacy, but their role in surgery resident wellness is poorly characterized. Objective To understand experiences with unionization among general surgery residents and residency program faculty and staff. Design, Setting, and Participants This exploratory qualitative study included data from the Surgical Education Culture Optimization Through Targeted Interventions Based on National Comparative Data (SECOND) trial. In the exploratory phase of the SECOND trial (from March 6, 2019, to March 12, 2020), semistructured interviews about wellness were conducted with residents, faculty (attending physicians), and staff (program administrators) at 15 general surgery residency programs. Unionization was identified as an emergent theme in the interviews. Data analysis was performed from March 2019 to May 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was resident and faculty experience with resident labor unions. In the qualitative analysis, lexical searches of interview transcripts identified content regarding resident labor unions. A codebook was developed inductively. Transcripts were coded by dyads, using a constant comparative approach, with differences reconciled by consensus. Results A total of 22 interview transcripts were identified with relevant content. Of these, 19 were individual interviews conducted with residents (n = 10), faculty (n = 4), administrative staff (n = 1), a program director (n = 1), a department chair (n = 1), and designated institutional officials (n = 2), and 3 were from resident focus groups. Residents from all postgraduate year levels, including professional development (ie, research) years, were represented. Interviewees discussed resident unions at 2 programs (1 recently unionized and 1 with a decades-long history). Interviewees described the lack of voice and the lack of agency as drivers of unionization ("Residents...are trying to take control of their well-being"). Increased salary stipends and/or housing stipends were the most concretely identified union benefits. Unanticipated consequences of unionization were described by both residents and faculty, including (1) irrelevance of union-negotiated benefits to surgical residents, (2) paradoxical losses of surgery department–provided benefits, and (3) framing of resident-faculty relationships as adversarial. Union executives were noted to be nonphysician administrators whose participation in discussions about clinical education progression may increase the time and effort to remediate a resident and/or reduce educators' will to meaningfully intervene. Active surgical resident participation within the union allows for an understanding of surgical trainees' unique needs and reduced conflict. Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study, unionization was a mechanism for resident voice and agency; the desire to unionize likely highlighted the lack of other such mechanisms in the training environment. However, these findings suggest that unionization may have had unintended consequences on benefits, flexibility, and teaching. Effective advocacy, whether within or outside the context of a union, was facilitated by participation from surgical residents. Future research should expand on this exploratory study by including a greater number of institutions and investigating the evolution of themes over time.

medicine, general & internal
Fighting on the frontlines: Intersectional organizing in educators' social justice unions during COVID‐19

Rhiannon M. Maton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12827

2022-03-25

Abstract:This article explores a growing trend in the politics of education: the intersectional frontline organizing work of educators' social justice unions on behalf of a woman‐dominated workforce and local students, families, and communities, many of whom experience racial and economic disparity. I show that educators' social justice unions have tended to coherently employ intersectional language to articulate student, family, and community need along racial and class lines during the COVID‐19 crisis, but have struggled to explicitly tie a gendered analysis of educators' working conditions to the raced and classed public school experiences of the populations they serve. In the spirit of supporting the growth of educators' social justice unions in the educational justice movement, I bring together the theoretical work of Angela Davis, David McNally and Nancy Fraser to argue that long‐term movement growth requires enhanced intentionality in naming systemic identity‐based linkages across worker and student experiences of public schooling while highlighting how “advanced neoliberalism” co‐opts identity‐based rhetoric to maximize capitalist accumulation for the few while limiting educational equity for the many. In other words, I assert that movement growth requires intentional articulation of the systemic identity‐based relations linking working with learning conditions in late‐stage capitalism.

womens studies,management
Beyond takeovers: politics comes to corporate control

J Pound

Abstract:In the 1990s, politics will replace takeovers as the defining tool for corporate governance challenges, and a marketplace of ideas will replace the frenzied activity that once dominated the financial marketplace in the 1980s. In the transaction-driven market of the past, corporate raiders used junk bonds and other financial tools to take control of their targets. In the new marketplace of ideas, debate will replace debt as active shareholders press specific operating policies for their target corporations in a new politicized market for corporate control. John Pound, associate professor of public policy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, reports that investors are already using shadow management committees, independent director slates, and outside experts to influence management policy. Pound cites Carl Icahn's battle for control of USX as an example of the emerging trend. What began as a hostile takeover ended with a negotiated solution in which many constituencies ultimately played a role in the restructuring of the company. This political approach to governance gives management a chance to embrace a bargain that is in its long-term interest. By promoting politically based tactics, managers can generate political capital with their major investors. Managers in companies as diverse as Avon and Lockheed now meet regularly with investors, seeking their input on both financial and strategic decisions. In the new politicized market for corporate control, striking a bargain with long-term investors is ultimately in the best interest of the corporation.
Common Threats and Managing Reputation in Executive Search Firms

William S. Harvey,Jonathan V. Beaverstock,Hongqin Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12312

IF: 5.6

2018-06-07

British Journal of Management

Abstract:A free video abstract to accompany this article can be found online at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IziwDorbeGU This paper provides important insights into how executive search firms can successfully manage their reputations to overcome major threats to their organizations. The paper focuses on three threats faced by executive search firms: the global financial crisis; questions around the sector's professional status; and the proliferation of social media for recruitment. Our data show that there was not a single coherent response from firms, but a piecemeal approach that focused on three forms of reputation management. First, diversifying service offerings; second, highlighting their symbolic capital; and third, connecting their firms to clients and candidates through partners. Building on our data and the theoretical literature, we provide a framework for understanding how professional service firms can manage their reputations in response to common threats, based on three categories from the English idiom ‘keep up with the Joneses’. First, moving away from the Joneses; second, fencing out the Joneses; third, networking more than the Joneses. We provide theoretical and practical insights around how organizations can manage their reputations in response to threats which are common across sectors.

management,business
Inspiring Leadership: How a Community Hospital Is Tackling Healthcare's Most Difficult Problems

Daniel P Edgcumbe,Krista Ieraci,Elaine Do Rosario,Michele Leroux

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2023.27216

Abstract:In the spring of 2022 - at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic - Halton Healthcare, a large community hospital corporation in southern Ontario, launched a brand-new leadership development program called "Inspiring Leadership" to support its workforce. Just one year later, the program is having a profound positive impact on the workforce with enhanced engagement and reduced turnover. By investging in people development, organizations can create a compelling employee value proposition, foster cross-continuum partnerships through Ontario Health Teams and community affiliates and, ultimately, advance their strategic objectives. In this article, we will describe the development of this unique program, its evaluation and its impact, with the intent of sharing this learning with other organizations so that they too might realize these benefits.

The new union strategy. Turning the community against you

Triad's new market strategy: a threat to community hospitals

The Battle Between Activist Hedge Funds and Labor Unions

Resident Unions: Why Now and Will They Change Medical Education and Health Care?

Rejecting conventional wisdom: how academic medical centers can regain their leadership positions

Don’t Fear the Union: Successful Management in a Unionized Library

Corporate cultures. Turning "us versus them" into "we"

Organized Labor as the New Undeserving Rich?: Mass Media, Class-Based Anti-Union Rhetoric and Public Support for Unions in the United States

Total Quality Management: Anti-Union Trojan Horse or Management Albatross?

The health care market: can hospitals survive?

Dual or dueling culture and commitment: The impact of a tri-hospital merger

Going public: references to the news media in NHS contract negotiations

Competition, integration, and diversification: seven hospitals of Growthville, U.S.A

The internal processes and behavioral dynamics of hospital boards: an exploration of differences between high- and low-performing hospitals

Engaging doctors in the health care revolution

The effects of corporate restructuring on hospital policymaking

Experiences With Unionization Among Surgical Resident Physicians, Faculty, and Staff

Fighting on the frontlines: Intersectional organizing in educators' social justice unions during COVID‐19

Beyond takeovers: politics comes to corporate control

Common Threats and Managing Reputation in Executive Search Firms

Inspiring Leadership: How a Community Hospital Is Tackling Healthcare's Most Difficult Problems