Abstract:The extraction of stereoscopic depth from retinal disparity, and motion direction from two-frame kinematograms, requires the solution of a correspondence problem. In previous psychophysical work [Read and Eagle (2000) Vision Res 40: 3345-3358], we compared the performance of the human stereopsis and motion systems with correlated and anti-correlated stimuli. We found that, although the two systems performed similarly for narrow-band stimuli, broadband anti-correlated kinematograms produced a strong perception of reversed motion, whereas the stereograms appeared merely rivalrous. I now model these psychophysical data with a computational model of the correspondence problem based on the known properties of visual cortical cells. Noisy retinal images are filtered through a set of Fourier channels tuned to different spatial frequencies and orientations. Within each channel, a Bayesian analysis incorporating a prior preference for small disparities is used to assess the probability of each possible match. Finally, information from the different channels is combined to arrive at a judgement of stimulus disparity. Each model system--stereopsis and motion--has two free parameters: the amount of noise they are subject to, and the strength of their preference for small disparities. By adjusting these parameters independently for each system, qualitative matches are produced to psychophysical data, for both correlated and anti-correlated stimuli, across a range of spatial frequency and orientation bandwidths. The motion model is found to require much higher noise levels and a weaker preference for small disparities. This makes the motion model more tolerant of poor-quality reverse-direction false matches encountered with anti-correlated stimuli, matching the strong perception of reversed motion that humans experience with these stimuli. In contrast, the lower noise level and tighter prior preference used with the stereopsis model means that it performs close to chance with anti-correlated stimuli, in accordance with human psychophysics. Thus, the key features of the experimental data can be reproduced assuming that the motion system experiences more effective noise than the stereoscopy system and imposes a less stringent preference for small disparities.

Noise causes slant underestimation in stereo and motion

Can Spatial Biases Be Eliminated Through Learning?

Perceptual Bias in 2D Orientation is Also Present in Obliquely-Viewed Planes

Perceived Aspect Ratio on Tilted Surfaces Supports the Hypothesis That Perceived Slant Approximates a Scaled Sine Function of Actual Slant

Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Exocentric Reference Frames Determine 2D Orientation Bias

ANGULAR OVERESTIMATION ENHANCES CODING PRECISION: SCALE EXPANSION THEORY IN SLANT PERCEPTION

The Perception of 2D Orientation is Categorically Biased

On accurate recovery of 3D surface normal using minimum 2D images

Downhill Slopes Look Shallower from the Edge.

Bayesian motion estimation accounts for a surprising bias in 3D vision

Why Do Things Seem Closer Than They Are?

Perceptual biases in the interpretation of 3D shape from shading

Stereoscopic slant contrast revisited

Stereovision Bias Removal by Autocorrelation

A Bayesian model of stereopsis depth and motion direction discrimination

Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception

Vertical size disparity and the correction of stereo correspondence

How distinct sources of nuisance variability in natural images and scenes limit human stereopsis

Effects of symmetry, texture, and monocular viewing on geographical slant estimation

Complexity of mental geometry for 3D pose perception