Abstract:We propose that the well-known dissociation between egocentric and exocentric distance perception (e.g., Loomis et al., 1992) is based on a distinction between two angular perceptual variables. Errors in exocentric distance tasks, such as the one underlying Gilinsky's (1951) experiments and the perception of depth/width ratio can be explained by biases in perceived optical slant. Errors in egocentric distance tasks, such as egocentric distance estimation, can be understood in terms of biases in the perception of angular declination. Whereas exocentric distance estimates typically demonstrate increasing compression with distance, egocentric distance estimates are normally compressed by a fairly constant amount. Li and Durgin (2010) have shown that exocentric aspect ratio tasks can be used as implicit measures of perceived optical slant which increase logarithmically with viewing distance. Here we further propose that explicit egocentric distance estimation can be treated as an implicit measure of perceived angular declination, which is biased in a linear fashion. To clarify that type of visual information matters more than type of task, we used an egocentric version of the depth/width aspect ratio task. Participants stood at one leg of an L-shape formed by them with two experimenters and were asked to position themselves the same distance from the central experimenter as the central experimenter was from the experimenter at the other leg of the L. Participants set themselves much too far from the central experimenter for all tested distances, consistent with overestimation of angular declination by a factor of about 1.5 (i.e., underestimation of egocentric distance by about 0.7). The egocentric aspect-ratio task provides evidence convergent with other explicit forms of egocentric distance estimation that perceived egocentric distance is underestimated. It also provides implicit quantitative confirmation of explicit evidence for the expanded coding of perceived angular declination, a variable important for motor control and spatial updating.

Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Depth Compression Based on Mis-Scaling of Binocular Disparity May Contribute to Angular Expansion in Perceived Optical Slant.

Slant Perception in Near Space is Categorically Biased: Evidence for a Vertical Tendency

Perceived Aspect Ratio on Tilted Surfaces Supports the Hypothesis That Perceived Slant Approximates a Scaled Sine Function of Actual Slant

ANGULAR OVERESTIMATION ENHANCES CODING PRECISION: SCALE EXPANSION THEORY IN SLANT PERCEPTION

Does Perceived Angular Declination Contribute to Perceived Optical Slant on Level Ground?

Downhill Slopes Look Shallower from the Edge.

Perceptual Scale Expansion: an Efficient Angular Coding Strategy for Locomotor Space.

Perceived Azimuth Direction is Exaggerated: Converging Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures

Two Distinct Angular Perceptual Variables Account for the Dissociation Between Egocentric and Exocentric Distance Perception

Why Do Hills Look So Steep?

A Comparison of Two Theories of Perceived Distance on the Ground Plane: the Angular Expansion Hypothesis and the Intrinsic Bias Hypothesis.

The Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion Produced with Small Objects

Body-centric and World-Centric Components of the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

Can Spatial Biases Be Eliminated Through Learning?

Humans have precise knowledge of familiar geographical slants.

Large Perceptual Distortions of Locomotor Action Space Occur in Ground-Based Coordinates: Angular Expansion and the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

A large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion produced with small objects separated in depth.

Perceptual Bias in 2D Orientation is Also Present in Obliquely-Viewed Planes

A Review on Slant Perception and its Influencing Factors

On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.