Abstract:Background. Action measures are commonly used to assess the accuracy of perception. However, actions can be calibrated to any stable perceptual experience because stability affords perceptuo-motor adaptation and prediction. Accuracy at action tasks therefore does not require accurate perception. To illustrate this, we measured dynamic pointing after locomotor adaptation. Method. We adapted participants to altered visual feedback during walking in an immersive panoramic virtual environment. Specifically, we doubled the visual gain of walking for one set of participants and adapted the second set to a normal gain. Following adaptation participants were tested in a dynamic pointing task while walking without visual feedback. That is, they started each trial pointing to an obliquely positioned target in the visual world and then tried to track the stationary (remembered) target with their hand while walking with eyes closed. Results. Participants adapted to a normal gain tracked the egocentric location of the targets relatively accurately. However, those adapted to doubled visual gain rotated their hand too rapidly even though they had never practiced pointing in the adapting environment. In contrast, explicit estimates of egocentric distance to similar targets did not differ as a function of adaptation condition, but underestimated egocentric distance in near space by a factor of about 0.75. Evidently adaptation altered spatial updating during locomotion without altering perceived target distance. Conclusions. A great deal of evidence suggests that egocentric distance is misperceived. Locomotor action measures, such as pointing, can be accomplished successfully if spatial updating of egocentric position is calibrated by experience. Thus any misperception of egocentric distance could be masked by such measures. Dynamic pointing tasks are informative about spatial updating, but they are not directly informative about the absolute scaling of perceived space. Actions can be calibrated to successfully reflect perceptuo-motor expectancies even in the presence of inaccurately scaled perceptions.

On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.

Frontal Extents Are Compressed in Virtual Reality

Why Do Things Seem Closer Than They Are?

Large Perceptual Distortions of Locomotor Action Space Occur in Ground-Based Coordinates: Angular Expansion and the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

Two Distinct Angular Perceptual Variables Account for the Dissociation Between Egocentric and Exocentric Distance Perception

Expert Performance by Athletes in the Verbal Estimation of Spatial Extents Does Not Alter Their Perceptual Metric of Space

Depth Compression Based on Mis-Scaling of Binocular Disparity May Contribute to Angular Expansion in Perceived Optical Slant.

A Comparison of Two Theories of Perceived Distance on the Ground Plane: the Angular Expansion Hypothesis and the Intrinsic Bias Hypothesis.

Perceived Azimuth Direction is Exaggerated: Converging Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures

Angular Expansion Theory Turned on Its Side

Can Spatial Biases Be Eliminated Through Learning?

Pointing Accurately at a Target Doesn't Require Perceiving Its Location Accurately

Beyond the SNARC Effect: Distance–number Mapping Occurs in the Peripersonal Space

The allocentric nature of ground-surface representation: A study of depth and location perception

Locomotion, Non-Isometric Mapping and Distance Perception in Virtual Reality

An allocentric human odometer for perceiving distances on the ground plane

The visual perception of long outdoor distances

Measuring egocentric distance perception in virtual reality: Influence of methodologies, locomotion and translation gains

The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks

Human Sensitivity to Slopes of Slanted Paths