Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children
May Chun Mei Wong,Rui Zhang,Bella Weijia Luo,Anne-Marie Glenny,Helen V Worthington,Edward Chin Man Lo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007693.pub3
IF: 8.4
2024-06-21
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract:This is an update of a review first published in 2010. Use of topical fluoride has become more common over time. Excessive fluoride consumption from topical fluorides in young children could potentially lead to dental fluorosis in permanent teeth. To describe the relationship between the use of topical fluorides in young children and the risk of developing dental fluorosis in permanent teeth. We carried out electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two trials registers. We searched the reference lists of relevant articles. The latest search date was 28 July 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi‐RCTs, cohort studies, case‐control studies, and cross‐sectional surveys comparing fluoride toothpaste, mouth rinses, gels, foams, paint‐on solutions, and varnishes to a different fluoride therapy, placebo, or no intervention. Upon the introduction of topical fluorides, the target population was children under six years of age. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. The primary outcome measure was the percentage prevalence of fluorosis in the permanent teeth. Two authors extracted data from all included studies. In cases where both adjusted and unadjusted risk ratios or odds ratios were reported, we used the adjusted value in the meta‐analysis. We included 43 studies: three RCTs, four cohort studies, 10 case‐control studies, and 26 cross‐sectional surveys. We judged all three RCTs, one cohort study, one case‐control study, and six cross‐sectional studies to have some concerns for risk of bias. We judged all other observational studies to be at high risk of bias. We grouped the studies into five comparisons. Comparison 1. Age at which children started toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste Two cohort studies (260 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children starting to use fluoride toothpaste for brushing at or before 12 months versus after 12 months and the development of fluorosis (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.18; very low‐certainty evidence). Similarly, evidence from one cohort study (3939 children) and two cross‐sectional studies (1484 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children starting to use fluoride toothpaste for brushing before or after the age of 24 months (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.13; very low‐certainty evidence) or before or after four years (odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.35; very low‐certainty evidence), respectively. Comparison 2. Frequency of toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste Two case‐control studies (258 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children brushing less than twice per day versus twice or more per day and the development of fluorosis (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.28; very low‐certainty evidence). Two cross‐sectional surveys (1693 children) demonstrated that brushing less than once per day versus once or more per day may be associated with a decrease in the development of fluorosis in children (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.74; low‐certainty evidence). Comparison 3. Amount of fluoride toothpaste used for toothbrushing Two case‐control studies (258 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between children using less than half a brush of toothpaste, versus half or more of the brush, and the development of fluorosis (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.46; very low‐certainty evidence). The evidence from cross‐sectional surveys was also very uncertain (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.28; 3 studies, 2037 children; very low‐certainty evidence). Comparison 4. Fluoride concentration in toothpaste There was evidence from two RCTs (1968 children) that lower fluoride concentration in the toothpaste used by children under six years of age likely reduces the risk of developing fluorosis: 550 parts per million (ppm) fluoride versus 1000 ppm (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99; moderate‐certainty evidence); 440 ppm fluoride versus 1450 ppm (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.89; moderate‐certainty evidence). The age at which the toothbrushing commenced was 24 months and 12 months, respectively. Two case‐control studies (258 children) provided very uncertain evidence regarding the association between fluoride concentrations under 1000 ppm, versus concentrations of 1000 ppm or above, and the development of fluorosis (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.52; very low‐certainty evidence). Comparison 5. Age at which topical fluoride varnish was applied There was evidence from one RCT (123 children) that there may be little to no difference between a fluoride varnish application before four years, versus no application, and the development of fluorosis (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.31; low‐certa -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal