Impact of Referring High-Risk Patients to Intensive Outpatient Primary Care Services: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Evelyn T Chang,Alexis Huynh,Caroline Yoo,Jean Yoon,Donna M Zulman,Michael K Ong,Melissa Klein,Jessica Eng,Sudip Roy,Susan E Stockdale,Elvira E Jimenez,Angela Denietolis,Jack Needleman,Steven M Asch,PACT Intensive Management (PIM) Demonstration Sites, PIM National Evaluation Center, and PIM Executive Committee,Brook Watts,Neha Pathak,Deborah Henry,Parag Dalsania,Jeffrey Jackson,Lisa Rubenstein,Gordon Schectman,Kathryn Corrigan,Carrie Patton,Belinda Velazquez,Edward Post,Traci Solt,Ami Shah,Rong Guo,Aryan Esmaeili,Claire Than,Karen Chu,Martin Lee,Kelsey Cummings,Lisa Tarr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08923-3
2024-07-29
Abstract:Background: Many healthcare systems have implemented intensive outpatient primary care programs with the hopes of reducing healthcare costs. Objective: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) piloted primary care intensive management (PIM) for patients at high risk for hospitalization or death, or "high-risk." We evaluated whether a referral model would decrease high-risk patient costs. Design: Retrospective cohort study using a quasi-experimental design comparing 456 high-risk patients referred to PIM from October 2017 to September 2018 to 415 high-risk patients matched on propensity score. Participants: Veterans in the top 10th percentile of risk for 90-day hospitalization or death and recent hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit. Intervention: PIM consisted of interdisciplinary teams that performed comprehensive assessments, intensive case management, and care coordination services. Main outcomes and measures: Change in VHA and non-VHA outpatient utilization, inpatient admissions, and costs 12 months pre- and post-index date. Key results: Of the 456 patients referred to PIM, 301 (66%) enrolled. High-risk patients referred to PIM had a marginal reduction in ED visits (- 0.7; [95% CI - 1.50 to 0.08]; p = 0.08) compared to propensity-matched high-risk patients; overall outpatient costs were similar. High-risk patients referred to PIM had similar number of medical/surgical hospitalizations (- 0.2; [95% CI, - 0.6 to 0.16]; p = 0.2), significant increases in length of stay (6.36; [CI, - 0.01 to 12.72]; p = 0.05), and higher inpatient costs ($22,628, [CI, $3587 to $41,669]; p = 0.02) than those not referred to PIM. Conclusions and relevance: VHA intensive outpatient primary care was associated with higher costs. Referral to intensive case management programs targets the most complex patients and may lead to increased utilization and costs, particularly in an integrated healthcare setting with robust patient-centered medical homes. Trial registration: PIM 2.0: Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) Intensive Management (PIM) Project (PIM2). NCT04521816. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04521816.