Remark 3.4 A Dedekind Finite Borel Set
Arnold W. Miller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.08947
2015-09-30
Abstract:Asaf Karagila pointed out that Remark 3.4 [1], directly contradicts Theorem 3.3 (c) [2] which was incorrectly stated. This note contains a proof of this remark.
[1] Miller, Arnold W.; A Dedekind Finite Borel Set, Arch. Math. Logic 50 (2011), no. 1-2, 1--17.
[2] Kanamori, A.; Pincus, D.; Does GCH imply AC locally?, Paul Erdos and his mathematics, II (Budapest, 1999), 413-426, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., 11, Janos Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 2002.
Logic