Abstract:A central topic in mathematical logic is the classification of theorems from mathematics in hierarchies according to their logical strength. Ideally, the place of a theorem in a hierarchy does not depend on the representation (aka coding) used. In this paper, we show that the standard representation of compact metric spaces in second-order arithmetic has a profound effect. To this end, we study basic theorems for such spaces like a continuous function has a supremum and a countable set has measure zero. We show that these and similar third-order statements imply at least Feferman's highly non-constructive projection principle, and even full second-order arithmetic or countable choice in some cases. When formulated with representations (aka codes), the associated second-order theorems are provable in rather weak fragments of second-order arithmetic. Thus, we arrive at the slogan that coding compact metric spaces in the language of second-order arithmetic can be as hard as second-order arithmetic or countable choice. We believe every mathematician should be aware of this slogan, as central foundational topics in mathematics make use of the standard second-order representation of compact metric spaces. In the process of collecting evidence for the above slogan, we establish a number of equivalences involving Feferman's projection principle and countable choice. We also study generalisations to fourth-order arithmetic and beyond with similar-but-stronger results.

A common Misconception about the Categorical Arithmetic

Epistemological Consequences of the Incompleteness Theorems

Incompleteness theorems via Turing category

Gödel incompleteness through Arithmetic Universes after A. Joyal

Proofs of valid categorical syllogisms in one diagrammatic and two symbolic axiomatic systems

The Goedel's legacy: revisiting the Logic

Categorical Structure in Theory of Arithmetic

Yablo's Paradox And Arithmetical Incompleteness

Constructive completeness and non-discrete languages

Categorical Proof-Theoretic Semantics

The Logic of Cardinality Comparison Without the Axiom of Choice

Gödel's Program in Set Theory

On Quantifiers for Quantitative Reasoning

Coding is hard

Equivalence of Intuitionistic Inductive Definitions and Intuitionistic Cyclic Proofs under Arithmetic

A classification of incompleteness statements

Toward a More Complete List of Completeness Axioms

On the Axiomatizability of Impossible Futures

On the Multicategorical Meta-Theorem and the Completeness of Restricted Algebraic Deduction Systems

PA is instantiationally complete, but algorithmically incomplete: An alternative interpretation of Goedelian incompleteness under Church's Thesis that links formal logic and computability