Abstract:Abstract Background The use of 3D planning to guide corrective osteotomies of the lower extremity is increasing in clinical practice. The use of computer-tomography (CT) data acquired in supine position neglects the weight-bearing (WB) state and the gold standard in 3D planning involves the manual adaption of the surgical plan after considering the WB state in long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, this process is subjective and dependent on the surgeons experience. A more standardized and automated method could reduce variability and decrease costs. Purpose The aim of the study was (1) to compare three different three-dimensional (3D) planning modalities for medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and (2) to describe the current practice of adapting NWB CT data after considering the WB state in LLR. The purpose of this study is to validate a new, standardized approach to include the WB state into the 3D planning and to compare this method against the current gold standard of 3D planning. Our hypothesis is that the correction is comparable to the gold standard, but shows less variability due compared to the more subjective hybrid approach. Methods Three surgical planning modalities were retrospectively analyzed in 43 legs scheduled for MOWHTO between 2015 and 2019. The planning modalities included: (1) 3D hybrid (3D non-weight-bearing (NWB) CT models after manual adaption of the opening angle considering the WB state in LLR, (2) 3D NWB (3D NWB CT models) and (3) 3D WB (2D/3D registration of 3D NWB CT models onto LLR to simulate the WB state). The pre- and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the planned opening angle (°) were assessed and differences among modalities reported. The relationship between the reported differences and BMI, preoperative HKA (LLR), medial meniscus extrusion, Outerbridge osteoarthritis grade and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) was analyzed. Results The mean (std) planned opening angle of 3D hybrid did not differ between 3D hybrid and 3D WB (0.4 ± 2.1°) (n.s.) but was higher in 3D hybrid compared to 3D NWB (1.1° ± 1.1°) ( p = 0.039). 3D WB demonstrated increased preoperative varus deformity compared to 3D NWB: 6.7 ± 3.8° vs. 5.6 ± 2.7° ( p = 0.029). Patients with an increased varus deformity in 3D WB compared to 3D NWB (> 2 °) demonstrated more extensive varus alignment in LLR ( p = 0.009) and a higher JLCA ( p = 0.013). Conclusion Small intermodal differences between the current practice of the reported 3D hybrid planning modality and a 3D WB approach using a 2D/3D registration algorithm were reported. In contrast, neglecting the WB state underestimates preoperative varus deformity and results in a smaller planned opening angle. This leads to potential under correction in MOWHTO, especially in patients with extensive varus deformities or JLCA. Clinical Relevance Incorporating the WB state in 3D planning modalities has the potential to increase accuracy and lead to a more consistent and reliable planning in MOWHTO. The inclusion of the WB state in automatized surgical planning algorithms has the potential to reduce costs and time in the future.

The effect of osteotomy depth and hinge axis orientation on biplanar surgical accuracy in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy—a deeper understanding by 3D simulations

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy alters patellofemoral joint kinematics: A multibody simulation study

Biomechanical Lower Limb Model to Predict Patellar Position Alteration after Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Validation of a Three-Dimensional Weight-Bearing Measurement Protocol for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Comparing Simulation Approaches Used in Finite Element Modelling of a Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Effect of the sagittal osteotomy inclination angle on the posterior tibial slope change in high tibial osteotomy: three-dimensional simulation study

Accuracy of Combined High Tibial Slope Correction Osteotomy Using 3-Dimensional-Planned Patient-Specific Instrumentation

Computer Aided High Tibial Open Wedge Osteotomy.

Hinge location and apical drill holes in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: A finite element analysis

Factors Causing Unintended Sagittal and Axial Alignment Changes in High Tibial Osteotomy: Comparative 3-Dimensional Analysis of Simulation and Actual Surgery

Influence of variable hinge positioning on coronal and sagittal alignment in uniplanar medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

The influence of the weight-bearing state on three-dimensional (3D) planning in lower extremity realignment – analysis of novel vs. state-of-the-art planning approaches

Influence of the angle between tibial and prosthesis mechanical axes on tibial bone remodeling in total knee arthroplasty

HKA Angle—A Reliable Planning Parameter for High Tibial Osteotomy: A Theoretical Analysis Using Standing Whole-Leg Radiographs

A preliminary modeling investigation into the safe correction zone for high tibial osteotomy

Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with Combined Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Plates and Taylor Spatial Frame for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.

Osseous factors influencing distal tibial rotation in biplane medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

Axial and torsional stability of an improved single-plane and a new bi-plane osteotomy technique for supracondylar femur osteotomies

How plate positioning impacts the biomechanics of the open wedge tibial osteotomy; A finite element analysis

3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instrumentation Technique Vs. Conventional Technique in Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Prospective Comparative Study

Changes in Patellar Height and Tibial Posterior Slope after Biplanar High Tibial Osteotomy with Computer‐Designed Personalized Surgical Guides: A Retrospective Study