Nonlinear relationships can lead to bias in biomass calculations and drift-foraging models when using summaries of invertebrate drift data

M. Dodrill,C. Yackulic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0507-8

2016-08-09

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Improving inference for nonlinear state-space models of animal population dynamics given biased sequential life stage data

Leo Polansky,Ken B. Newman,Lara Mitchell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.09111

2019-09-20

Abstract:State-space models (SSMs) are a popular tool for modeling animal abundances. Inference difficulties for simple linear SSMs are well known, particularly in relation to simultaneous estimation of process and observation variances. Several remedies to overcome estimation problems have been studied for relatively simple SSMs, but whether these challenges and proposed remedies apply for nonlinear stage-structured SSMs, an important class of ecological models, is less well understood. Here we identify improvements for inference about nonlinear stage-structured SSMs fit with biased sequential life stage data. Theoretical analyses indicate parameter identifiability requires covariates in the state processes. Simulation studies show that plugging in externally estimated observation variances, as opposed to jointly estimating them with other parameters, reduces bias and standard error of estimates. In contrast to previous results for simple linear SSMs, strong confounding between jointly estimated process and observation variance parameters was not found in the models explored here. However, when observation variance was also estimated in the motivating case study, the resulting process variance estimates were implausibly low (near-zero). As SSMs are used in increasingly complex ways, understanding when inference can be expected to be successful, and what aids it, becomes more important. Our study illustrates (i) the need for relevant process covariates and (ii) the benefits of using externally estimated observation variances for inference for nonlinear stage-structured SSMs.

Populations and Evolution,Quantitative Methods,Methodology
Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts

Tara L Crewe,Philip D Taylor,Denis Lepage

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130137

IF: 3.7

2015-06-18

PLoS ONE

Abstract:The use of counts of unmarked migrating animals to monitor long term population trends assumes independence of daily counts and a constant rate of detection. However, migratory stopovers often last days or weeks, violating the assumption of count independence. Further, a systematic change in stopover duration will result in a change in the probability of detecting individuals once, but also in the probability of detecting individuals on more than one sampling occasion. We tested how variation in stopover duration influenced accuracy and precision of population trends by simulating migration count data with known constant rate of population change and by allowing daily probability of survival (an index of stopover duration) to remain constant, or to vary randomly, cyclically, or increase linearly over time by various levels. Using simulated datasets with a systematic increase in stopover duration, we also tested whether any resulting bias in population trend could be reduced by modeling the underlying source of variation in detection, or by subsampling data to every three or five days to reduce the incidence of recounting. Mean bias in population trend did not differ significantly from zero when stopover duration remained constant or varied randomly over time, but bias and the detection of false trends increased significantly with a systematic increase in stopover duration. Importantly, an increase in stopover duration over time resulted in a compounding effect on counts due to the increased probability of detection and of recounting on subsequent sampling occasions. Under this scenario, bias in population trend could not be modeled using a covariate for stopover duration alone. Rather, to improve inference drawn about long term population change using counts of unmarked migrants, analyses must include a covariate for stopover duration, as well as incorporate sampling modifications (e.g., subsampling) to reduce the probability that individuals will be detected on more than one occasion.
Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance

Codey L. Mathis,Darin J. McNeil,Melanie Kammerer,Jeffery L. Larkin,Michael J. Skvarla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1380622

IF: 3

2024-05-22

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:Introduction: There is overwhelming evidence of declines in native bee populations and therefore a need for increased monitoring to track these declines and assist in conservation and restoration efforts. Bees can be sampled non-lethally through visual surveys (e.g., distance transects) or lethally through active (e.g., hand netting) or passive (e.g., traps that lure insects from afar) methods. These lethal methods suffer from imperfect detection that is difficult to account for and can confound inferences about habitat characteristics. Additionally, evidence suggests that lethal sampling methods can even invert habitat quality patterns such that high-quality sites yield fewer individuals and low-quality sites yield more individuals. Methods: To study potential biases associated with imperfect detection, we used hierarchical density estimation with visual surveys to estimate density of bees within 40 young forest patches across Pennsylvania, USA. We surveyed bee communities non-lethally using visual surveys and lethally using blue-vane traps and bee bowls every two weeks between May and September 2019. We collected data on blooming flowers, vegetation structure, and weather during times of survey. Results: We found that bee densities estimated from distance transects had a positive relationship with floral resource availability. In contrast, abundance measured via bee bowls and blue-vane traps had no relationship, or sometimes even negative trends with habitat quality, including floral resource availability. Raw bee counts within 2-m of the transect always correlated with modeled densities, showing that some methods do not share the biases of attractive traps. Discussion: Our study demonstrates that failing to account for imperfect detection can impact the interpretation of pollinator surveys and adds to a growing body of literature that acknowledges the value of distance sampling for insects like bees to better understand species' habitat needs and to monitor populations for conservation.

ecology
Improved state-space models for inference about spatial and temporal variation in abundance from count data

Jeffrey A. Hostetler,Richard B. Chandler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1487.1

IF: 4.8

2015-06-01

Ecology

Abstract:Models of population dynamics are frequently used for purposes such as testing hypotheses about density dependence and predicting species' responses to future environmental change or conservation actions. Fitting models of population dynamics to field data is challenging because most data sets are characterized by observation error, which can inflate estimates of process variation if ignored. Recently, state‐space models have been developed to deal with this problem by directly modeling both the observation error and the ecological process of interest. Conventional state‐space models, however, have several important limitations: (1) they assume that random effects are Gaussian distributed, which implies that abundance can be negative and that false positive observation errors are equally likely as false negative errors; (2) they do not admit spatial variation in population dynamics; and (3) some of the parameters of the model are not estimable. We demonstrate how each of these problems can be resolved using a class of hierarchical models proposed by Dail and Madsen (2011) that attributes observation error to imperfect detection. We expand this class of models to accommodate classical growth models (e.g., exponential and Ricker‐logistic), zero‐inflation, and random effects. We also present methods for forecasting population size under future environmental conditions. Implementation of these ideas is possible using either frequentist or Bayesian methods, as demonstrated by accompanying R and JAGS code. Results of a simulation study suggest that bias is negligible and coverage nominal in most cases for the proposed model extensions. An analysis of data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey highlights how these methods can be readily applied to existing data, but it also suggests that precision will be low when direct information about detection probability (such as is collected using distance sampling or replicated counts) is lacking.

ecology
Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models

Robby R Marrotte,Eric J Howe,Kaela B Beauclerc,Derek Potter,Joseph M Northrup

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13490

IF: 3.061

2022-06-07

PeerJ

Abstract:Landscape structure affects animal movement. Differences between landscapes may induce heterogeneity in home range size and movement rates among individuals within a population. These types of heterogeneity can cause bias when estimating population size or density and are seldom considered during analyses. Individual heterogeneity, attributable to unknown or unobserved covariates, is often modelled using latent mixture distributions, but these are demanding of data, and abundance estimates are sensitive to the parameters of the mixture distribution. A recent extension of spatially explicit capture-recapture models allows landscape structure to be modelled explicitly by incorporating landscape connectivity using non-Euclidean least-cost paths, improving inference, especially in highly structured (riparian & mountainous) landscapes. Our objective was to investigate whether these novel models could improve inference about black bear (Ursus americanus) density. We fit spatially explicit capture-recapture models with standard and complex structures to black bear data from 51 separate study areas. We found that non-Euclidean models were supported in over half of our study areas. Associated density estimates were higher and less precise than those from simple models and only slightly more precise than those from finite mixture models. Estimates were sensitive to the scale (pixel resolution) at which least-cost paths were calculated, but there was no consistent pattern across covariates or resolutions. Our results indicate that negative bias associated with ignoring heterogeneity is potentially severe. However, the most popular method for dealing with this heterogeneity (finite mixtures) yielded potentially unreliable point estimates of abundance that may not be comparable across surveys, even in data sets with 136-350 total detections, 3-5 detections per individual, 97-283 recaptures, and 80-254 spatial recaptures. In these same study areas with high sample sizes, we expected that landscape features would not severely constrain animal movements and modelling non-Euclidian distance would not consistently improve inference. Our results suggest caution in applying non-Euclidean SCR models when there is no clear landscape covariate that is known to strongly influence the movement of the focal species, and in applying finite mixture models except when abundant data are available.
Assessing and mitigating systematic errors in forest attribute maps utilizing harvester and airborne laser scanning data

Janne Räty,Marius Hauglin,Rasmus Astrup,Johannes Breidenbach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.04679

2022-12-19

Abstract:Cut-to-length harvesters collect useful information for modeling relationships between forest attributes and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. However, harvesters operate in mature forests, which may introduce selection biases that can result in systematic errors in harvester data-based forest attribute maps. We fitted regression models (harvester models) for volume (V), height (HL), stem frequency (N), above-ground biomass, basal area, and quadratic mean diameter (QMD) using harvester and ALS data. Performances of the harvester models were evaluated using national forest inventory plots in an 8.7 Mha study area. We estimated biases of large-area synthetic estimators and compared efficiencies of model-assisted (MA) estimators with field data-based direct estimators. The harvester models performed better in productive than unproductive forests, but systematic errors occurred in both. The use of MA estimators resulted in efficiency gains that were largest for HL (relative efficiency, RE=6.0) and smallest for QMD (RE=1.5). The bias of the synthetic estimator was largest for N (39%) and smallest for V (1%). The latter was due to an overestimation of deciduous and an underestimation of spruce forests that by chance balanced. We conclude that a probability sample of reference observations may be required to ensure the unbiasedness of estimators utilizing harvester data.

Applications,Other Statistics
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models

Weidong Gu,Robert K Swihart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00190-3

IF: 7.499

2004-04-01

Biological Conservation

Abstract:Presence–absence data are used widely in analysis of wildlife–habitat relationships. Failure to detect a species’ presence in an occupied habitat patch is a common sampling problem when the population size is small, individuals are difficult to sample, or sampling effort is limited. In this paper, the influence of non-detection of occurrence on parameter estimates of logistic regression models of wildlife–habitat relationships was assessed using analytical analysis and simulations. Two patterns of non-detection were investigated: (1) a random distribution of non-detection among occupied patches; and (2) a non-random distribution of non-detection in which the probability of detecting a species in an occupied patch covaried with measurable habitat variables. Our results showed that logistic regression models of wildlife–habitat relationships were sensitive to even low levels of non-detection in occupancy data. Both analytic and simulation studies show that non-detection yields bias in parameter estimation of logistic regression models. More importantly, the direction of bias was affected by the underlying pattern of non-detection and whether the habitat variable was positively or negatively related to occupancy. For a positive habitat coefficient, a random distribution of non-detection yielded negative bias in estimation, whereas linkage of the probability of non-detection to habitat covariates produced positive bias. For a negative habitat coefficient, the pattern was reversed, with a random distribution of non-detection leading to positive bias in estimation. A release–recapture livetrapping study of small mammals in central Indiana, USA, was used to illustrate the magnitude of non-detection in a typical field sampling protocol with varying levels of sampling intensity. Estimates of non-detection error ranged from 0 to 23% for seven species after 5 days of sampling. We suggest that for many sampling situations, relationships between probability of detection and habitat covariates need to be established to correctly interpret results of wildlife–habitat models.

environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
Using Inverse Probability Bootstrap Sampling to Eliminate Sample Induced Bias in Model Based Analysis of Unequal Probability Samples

Matthew Nahorniak,David P. Larsen,Carol Volk,Chris E. Jordan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131765

IF: 3.7

2015-06-30

PLoS ONE

Abstract:In ecology, as in other research fields, efficient sampling for population estimation often drives sample designs toward unequal probability sampling, such as in stratified sampling. Design based statistical analysis tools are appropriate for seamless integration of sample design into the statistical analysis. However, it is also common and necessary, after a sampling design has been implemented, to use datasets to address questions that, in many cases, were not considered during the sampling design phase. Questions may arise requiring the use of model based statistical tools such as multiple regression, quantile regression, or regression tree analysis. However, such model based tools may require, for ensuring unbiased estimation, data from simple random samples, which can be problematic when analyzing data from unequal probability designs. Despite numerous method specific tools available to properly account for sampling design, too often in the analysis of ecological data, sample design is ignored and consequences are not properly considered. We demonstrate here that violation of this assumption can lead to biased parameter estimates in ecological research. In addition, to the set of tools available for researchers to properly account for sampling design in model based analysis, we introduce inverse probability bootstrapping (IPB). Inverse probability bootstrapping is an easily implemented method for obtaining equal probability re-samples from a probability sample, from which unbiased model based estimates can be made. We demonstrate the potential for bias in model-based analyses that ignore sample inclusion probabilities, and the effectiveness of IPB sampling in eliminating this bias, using both simulated and actual ecological data. For illustration, we considered three model based analysis tools--linear regression, quantile regression, and boosted regression tree analysis. In all models, using both simulated and actual ecological data, we found inferences to be biased, sometimes severely, when sample inclusion probabilities were ignored, while IPB sampling effectively produced unbiased parameter estimates.

multidisciplinary sciences
Relative Bias in Catch Among Long-Term Fish Monitoring Surveys Within the San Francisco Estuary

Brock Huntsman,Brian Mahardja,Samuel Bashevkin,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2022v20iss20art3

2022-03-17

San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science

Abstract:Fish monitoring gears rarely capture all available fish, an inherent bias in monitoring programs referred to as catchability. Catchability is a source of bias that can be affected by numerous aspects of gear deployment (e.g., deployment speed, mesh size, and avoidance behavior). Thus, care must be taken when multiple surveys—especially those using different sampling methods—are combined to answer spatio-temporal questions about population and community dynamics. We assessed relative catchability differences among four long-term fish monitoring surveys from the San Francisco Estuary: the Bay Study Otter Trawl (BSOT), the Bay Study Midwater Trawl (BSMT), the Fall Midwater Trawl (FMWT), and the Suisun Marsh Otter Trawl (SMOT). We used generalized additive models with a spatio-temporal smoother and survey as a fixed effect to predict gear-specific estimates of catch for 45 different fish species within large and small size classes. We used estimates of the fixed effect coefficients for each survey (e.g., BSOT) relative to the reference gear (FMWT) to develop relative measures of catchability among taxa, surveys, and fish-size classes, termed the catch-ratio. We found higher relative catchability of 27%, 22%, and 57% of fish species in large size classes from the FMWT than in the BSMT, BSOT, or SMOT, respectively. In the small size class, relative catchability was higher in the FMWT than the BSMT, BSOT, or SMOT for 50%, 18%, and 25% of fish species, respectively. As expected, relative catchability of demersal species was higher in the otter trawls (BSOT, SMOT) while relative catchability of pelagic species was higher in the midwater trawls (FMWT, BSMT). Our results demonstrate that catchability is a source of bias among monitoring efforts within the San Francisco Estuary, and assuming equal catchability among surveys, species, and size classes could result in significant bias when describing spatio-temporal patterns in catch if ignored.
Realized thermal niche approach eliminates temperature bias in bioenergetic model estimates

Silviya V. Ivanova,Aaron T. Fisk,Timothy B. Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10974

IF: 3.167

2024-02-16

Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:Bioenergetics models are routinely used to estimate food consumption or growth and are thus critical tools in applied science and decision‐making in aquatic ecosystem and species management. Even though fish telemetry is widely used and has enabled researchers to accurately document in‐situ temperatures aligned with dynamic fish behavior, that is, their realized thermal niche, the traditional use of lab‐derived optimum temperatures based on the physiological optimum theory in models still persists. In this study, we contrasted optimum and field temperature data in models and quantified the effects on growth and consumption of two widely distributed salmonids that occupy both marine and freshwater ecosystems. We demonstrate that significant biases in the model estimates of growth and lifetime prey consumption produced using lab‐obtained optimum temperatures could be eliminated by the adoption of realized thermal niche approach to bioenergetics modeling. Bioenergetics models estimate ectotherm growth, production, and prey consumption – all key for effective ecosystem management during changing global temperatures. Based on species‐specific allometric and thermodynamic relationships, these models typically use the species' lab‐derived optimum temperatures (physiological optimum) as opposed to empirical field data (realized thermal niche) that reflect actual thermal experience. Yet, dynamic behavioral thermoregulation mediated by biotic and abiotic interactions may provide substantial divergence between physiological optimum and realized thermal niche temperatures to significantly bias model outcomes. Here, using the Wisconsin bioenergetics model and in‐situ year‐round temperature data, we tested the two approaches and compared the maximum attainable lifetime weight and lifetime prey consumption estimates for two salmonid species with differing life histories. We demonstrate that using the realized thermal niche is the better approach because it eliminates significant biases in estimates produced by the physiological optimum. Specifically, using the physiological optimum, slower‐growing Salvelinus namaycush maximum attainable lifetime weight was underestimated, and consumption overestimated, while fast‐growing Oncorhynchus tshawytscha maximum attainable weight was overestimated. While the physiological optimum approach is useful for theoretical studies, our results demonstrate the critical importance that models used by management utilize up‐to‐date system‐ and species‐specific field data representing actual in‐situ behaviors (i.e., realized thermal niche).

ecology,evolutionary biology
The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture–recapture analysis

Catherine Sun,A. Cole Burton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01182

2024-03-15

Wildlife Biology

Abstract:Wildlife populations can be unmarked, meaning individuals lack distinguishing features for individual identification. Populations may also exhibit non‐independent movements, meaning individuals move together. For populations of either unmarked or non‐independent individuals, models based on spatial capture–recapture (SCR) approaches can be used to estimate abundance, density, and other parameters critical for monitoring, management, and conservation. However, when individuals are both unmarked and non‐independent, few model options are available. One approach has been to apply unmarked models and not address the non‐independence despite unquantified impacts on bias, precision, and the ability to make robust ecological inferences. We conducted a simulation study to quantify the impact of non‐independence on the performance of spatial count (SC) and spatial partial identity models (SPIM) – two SCR‐based unmarked modeling approaches – and used the performance of fully marked and independent SCR as a reference. We varied the levels of non‐independence (aggregation and cohesion), detection probability, and the number of partial identity covariates used to resolve identities in SPIM estimation. We expected abundance estimates to be increasingly biased and precise as aggregation and cohesion increased. Results showed that models indeed became less robust to increasing non‐independence, but importantly suggested that only SPIM could be reliably applied under low levels of cohesion when sufficient partial identity covariates are available. SC yielded consistently biased estimates with poor precision. SCR was consistently robust across combinations of aggregation and cohesion, as expected. We therefore advise against the use of SC models for estimating population parameters when individuals are known to be non‐independent, caution that SPIM may be used under narrow ecological conditions, and encourage continued investigations into sampling design and methods development for estimating populations of unmarked and non‐independent individuals.

ecology,zoology
Stochastic foraging paths primarily drives within-species variations of prey consumption rates

Vincent Bansaye,Geoffroy Berthelot,Amina El Bachari,Jean-Rene Chazottes,Sylvain Billiard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.29.596370

2024-06-02

Abstract:The speed at which individuals interact, in particular prey and predators, affects ecological processes at all scales, including how fast matter and energy flow through ecosystems, and how stable communities are. Environmental heterogeneity and individual variabilities are generally believed to be the main factors underlying the variation of consumption rates of prey by predators. We challenge this view by comparing predicted variability from a stochastic model to experimental data. We first analyze a stochastic model of a simple random walk with elementary ecological processes involved in prey consumption, including prey depletion, predator movements and prey handling. We provide sharp approximations of the distribution of the consumption rate and a quantitative prediction of the coefficient of variation when stochastic foraging is the only source of variability. Predictions are then compared to the coefficients of variation estimated from data from dozens of various species and experimental contexts. We show that the predictions only accounting for intrinsic stochasticity in foraging are compatible with the range of observed values, in particular in 1 or 2 dimensional space. After evaluating the robustness of our model's predictions through stochastic computer simulations, we conclude that the main driver of the variation of the consumption rate is the foraging process itself rather than environmental or between-individual variabilities. Our approach lays the foundations for unifying foraging theory and population ecology, and as such has many empirical and theoretical implications for both fields.

Ecology
Estimating Abundance from Counts in Large Data Sets of Irregularly-Spaced Plots using Spatial Basis Functions

Jay M. Ver Hoef,John K. Jansen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1410.3163

2014-10-13

Abstract:Monitoring plant and animal populations is an important goal for both academic research and management of natural resources. Successful management of populations often depends on obtaining estimates of their mean or total over a region. The basic problem considered in this paper is the estimation of a total from a sample of plots containing count data, but the plot placements are spatially irregular and non randomized. Our application had counts from thousands of irregularly-spaced aerial photo images. We used change-of-support methods to model counts in images as a realization of an inhomogeneous Poisson process that used spatial basis functions to model the spatial intensity surface. The method was very fast and took only a few seconds for thousands of images. The fitted intensity surface was integrated to provide an estimate from all unsampled areas, which is added to the observed counts. The proposed method also provides a finite area correction factor to variance estimation. The intensity surface from an inhomogeneous Poisson process tends to be too smooth for locally clustered points, typical of animal distributions, so we introduce several new overdispersion estimators due to poor performance of the classic one. We used simulated data to examine estimation bias and to investigate several variance estimators with overdispersion. A real example is given of harbor seal counts from aerial surveys in an Alaskan glacial fjord.

Methodology
Recognizing and prevention of probable regime shift in density regulated and Allee type stochastic harvesting model with application to herring conservation

Anurag Sau,Sabyasachi Bhattacharya,Bapi Saha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.07534

2021-08-17

Populations and Evolution

Abstract:An ecological system with multiple stable equilibria is prone to undergo catastrophic change or regime shift from one steady-state to another. It should be noted that, if one of the steady states is an extinction state, the catastrophic change may lead to extinction. A suitable manual measure may control the prevention of catastrophic changes of different species from one equilibrium to another. We consider two stochastic models with linear and nonlinear harvesting terms. We inspect either density regulation or Allee type density regulated models [Saha et al., Ecological Modelling, 2013], which have substantial applications in the herring fish population's viability study. Both the deterministic models we consider here contain bi-stability under certain restrictions, and in that case, one of the stable states is the extinction state. We assume that the dynamical system under consideration is closed, i.e., immigration and emigration are absent. The demographic noise is introduced in the system by substituting an ordinary differential equation with a stochastic differential equation model, where the birth and death rates of the deterministic process are used to obtain the instantaneous mean and variance in the stochastic differential equation. Our study reveals that, the catastrophic changes can be avoided manually by a suitable choice of handling time that will eventually help to prevent the sudden extinction of the harvested population. The entire study is illustrated through the herring population size data obtained from the Global Population Dynamics Database (GPDD) and simulation experiment.
Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management

Katherine T Bickerton,John G Ewen,Stefano Canessa,Nik C Cole,Fay Frost,Rouben Mootoocurpen,Rachel McCrea

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2918

Abstract:Mark-recapture surveys are commonly used to monitor translocated populations globally. Data gathered are then used to estimate demographic parameters, such as abundance and survival, using Jolly-Seber (JS) models. However, in translocated populations initial population size is known and failure to account for this may bias parameter estimates, which are important for informing conservation decisions during population establishment. Here, we provide methods to account for known initial population size in JS models by incorporating a separate component likelihood for translocated individuals, using a maximum-likelihood estimation, with models that can be fitted using either R or MATLAB. We use simulated data and a case study of a threatened lizard species with low capture probability to demonstrate that unconstrained JS models may overestimate the size of translocated populations, especially in the early stages of post-release monitoring. Our approach corrects this bias; we use our simulations to demonstrate that overestimates of population size between 78% and 130% can occur in the unconstrained JS models when the detection probability is below 0.3 compared to 1%-8.9% for our constrained model. Our case study did not show an overestimate; however accounting for the initial population size greatly reduced error in all parameter estimates and prevented boundary estimates. Adopting the corrected JS model for translocations will help managers to obtain more robust estimates of the population sizes of translocated animals, better informing future management including reinforcement decisions, and ultimately improving translocation success.
Comparison of linear and nonlinear modeling approaches to develop an abundance index based on voyage and market data for a data-limited fishery

Tzu-Lun Yuan,Haikun Xu,Bing-Jing Lu,Shui-Kai Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1344181

IF: 5.247

2024-05-08

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:Introduction: Worldwide coastal fish resources face severe threats from fisheries overexploitation. However, the evaluation of abundance trends in most coastal fisheries is constrained by limited data. This study took blackmouth croaker ( Atrobucca nibe ), a stock depleted by coastal trawl fishery in southwestern Taiwan, as an example to showcase the development of a relative abundance index from data-limited fishery (only landing data were available). Methods: This study employed unique data sourcing from voyage data recorders (VDRs) to estimate fishing effort (in combination with landing data to estimate the catch per unit effort, CPUE) that demonstrated the potential application in global data-limited fisheries and assessed alternative approaches for predictors of fishery-targeting practices to condition effort for producing more accurate metrics of relative abundance. The nominal CPUE was standardized using three statistical models: generalized linear model, generalized additive model (GAM), and vector-autoregressive spatiotemporal models (VASTs) with two treatments of each of the four effects: environmental (sea temperature, salinity, density of mixing layer, seafloor temperature, and chlorophyll), vessel, spatial, and targeting effects. A total of 15 models were designed and compared for these effects, and their explanatory power (EP) was evaluated using cross-validation R 2 and other metrics. Results and discussion: Results indicated that the targeting effect exerted the most significant influence on standardization and was suggested to be addressed through the principal component analysis (PCA) approach. Both vessel and spatial effects demonstrated considerable influence, whereas the environmental effect exhibited a limited impact, possibly due to the small fishing area in this study. Regarding models' EP, given the nonlinear nature of the PCA algorithm and environmental data, the study highlighted the superiority of the GAM over linear-based models. However, incorporating nonlinear features in VAST (M15) makes it the most effective model in terms of predictive power in this study. Concerning the stock status, despite variations in relative CPUE trends among major models, a general declining trend since 2015 signals the potential decline of the blackmouth stock and urges fishery managers to consider further design of management measures.

marine & freshwater biology
Lost in the woods: shifting habitats can lead phylogeography astray

Richard A Neher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.601889

2024-07-05

Abstract:Continuous phylogeographic inference is a popular method to reconstruct the spatial distribution of ancestral populations and estimate parameters of the dispersal process. While the underlying probabilistic models can be complex and their parameters are often computationally demanding to infer, these models typically ignore that replication and population growth are tightly coupled to spatial location: populations expand into fertile uninhabited areas and contract in regions with limited resources. Here, I first investigate the sampling consistency of popular summary statistics of dispersal and show that estimators of "lineage velocities" are ill-defined. I then use simulations to investigate how local density regulation or shifting habitats perturb phylogeographic inference and show that these can result in biased and overconfident estimates of ancestral locations and dispersal parameters. These, sometimes dramatic, distortions depend in complicated ways on the past dynamics of habitats and underlying population dynamics and dispersal processes. Consequently, the validity of phylogeographic inferences, in particular when involving poorly sampled locations or extrapolations far into the past, is hard to assess and confidence can be much lower than suggested by the inferred posterior distributions.

Evolutionary Biology
Measurement errors in line transect surveys where detectability varies with distance and size.

Song Xi Chen,Ann Cowling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00732.x

IF: 1.701

2001-01-01

Biometrics

Abstract:When using bivariate line transect methods to estimate the biomass density of a tightly clustered biological population, it is generally assumed that both the perpendicular distance front the trackline to the cluster and the cluster size, or biomass, are measured without error. This is unlikely to be the ease in practice. In this article, assuming additive mean zero errors in distance and multiplicative errors in size, we develop an estimator of density that corrects for these errors. We use the method of moments for the case of gamma cluster size, randomly placed transect lines, and the generalized exponential detection function. We derive results that show that it may not be necessary to correct for errors in distance or size when the distance and size estimates are not biased. When the size estimates are biased, the biomass density estimate has approximately the same bias as the size estimates. The work is illustrated in the context of animal aerial surveys for juvenile southern bluefin tuna in the Great Australian Bight.
The improbability of detecting trade-offs and some practical solutions

Marc T J Johnson,Zain Nassrullah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae096

2024-08-07

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Abstract:Abstract Trade-offs are a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology because they are thought to explain much of nature’s biological diversity, from variation in life-histories to differences in metabolism. Despite the predicted importance of trade-offs, they are notoriously difficult to detect. Here we contribute to the existing rich theoretical literature on trade-offs by examining how the shape of the distribution of resources or metabolites acquired in an allocation pathway influences the strength of trade-offs between traits. We further explore how variation in resource distribution interacts with two aspects of pathway complexity (i.e., the number of branches and hierarchical structure) affects tradeoffs. We simulate variation in the shape of the distribution of a resource by sampling 106 individuals from a beta distribution with varying parameters to alter the resource shape. In a simple “Y-model” allocation of resources to two traits, any variation in a resource leads to slopes less than −1, with left skewed and symmetrical distributions leading to negative relationships between traits, and highly right skewed distributions associated with positive relationships between traits. Adding more branches further weakens negative and positive relationships between traits, and the hierarchical structure of pathways typically weakens relationships between traits, although in some contexts hierarchical complexity can strengthen positive relationships between traits. Our results further illuminate how variation in the acquisition and allocation of resources, and particularly the shape of a resource distribution and how it interacts with pathway complexity, makes its challenging to detect trade-offs. We offer several practical suggestions on how to detect trade-offs given these challenges.

genetics & heredity,ecology,evolutionary biology
Evaluating trade-offs in spatial versus temporal replication when estimating avian community composition and predicting species distributions

Steven Van Wilgenburg,David Miller,David Iles,Samuel Haché,Charles Francis,David Hope,Judith Toms,Kiel Drake

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ace-02604-190111

2024-04-12

Avian Conservation and Ecology

Abstract:Species distribution modeling is important for predicting species responses to environmental change, but model accuracy can be limited by a lack of data in remote areas. Hierarchically stratified surveys (cluster sampling) offer an efficient approach to sampling in remote areas, but an appropriate balance is needed between cost efficiency and statistical independence. The cost-effectiveness of cluster sampling likely varies with temporal sampling intensity (e.g., single vs. multiple repeat samples) due to differences in spatial autocorrelation. Our aim was to assess the trade-offs between spatial and temporal replication and optimize sampling in which temporal replication occurs. We used bootstrap resampling to create alternative designs from multi-species avian point-count and autonomous recording unit data. We varied the number of primary sample units (PSUs), secondary sampling units per PSU (SSUs), and temporal repeat samples (i.e., visits) at each SSU. We fit species accumulation curves to examine how spatial and temporal replication influenced species accumulation. We split data into spatially independent model training and validation datasets and fit species distribution models (SDM) for 47 species using generalized linear models and examined how prediction accuracy changed with sampling intensity to examine the cost-benefit trade-offs between spatial versus temporal replication within PSUs. We found that spatial and temporal replication were partially redundant and adding more visits had less influence on predictive accuracy when there were more SSUs and vice versa. The cost-benefit of increasing spatial replication within PSUs varied with the costs of accessing SSUs. The optimal number of SSUs per PSU varied with both temporal replication and the number of unique PSUs sampled. In general, using ≤ 3 SSUs per PSU produced the most accurate SDM predictions when the number of PSUs was high. When the number of PSUs was low and/or SSU costs were low, increasing clustering within PSUs can optimize sampling. The post Evaluating trade-offs in spatial versus temporal replication when estimating avian community composition and predicting species distributions first appeared on Avian Conservation and Ecology.

biodiversity conservation,ornithology

Nonlinear relationships can lead to bias in biomass calculations and drift-foraging models when using summaries of invertebrate drift data

Improving inference for nonlinear state-space models of animal population dynamics given biased sequential life stage data

Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts

Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance

Improved state-space models for inference about spatial and temporal variation in abundance from count data

Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models

Assessing and mitigating systematic errors in forest attribute maps utilizing harvester and airborne laser scanning data

Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models

Using Inverse Probability Bootstrap Sampling to Eliminate Sample Induced Bias in Model Based Analysis of Unequal Probability Samples

Relative Bias in Catch Among Long-Term Fish Monitoring Surveys Within the San Francisco Estuary

Realized thermal niche approach eliminates temperature bias in bioenergetic model estimates

The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture–recapture analysis

Stochastic foraging paths primarily drives within-species variations of prey consumption rates

Estimating Abundance from Counts in Large Data Sets of Irregularly-Spaced Plots using Spatial Basis Functions

Recognizing and prevention of probable regime shift in density regulated and Allee type stochastic harvesting model with application to herring conservation

Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management

Comparison of linear and nonlinear modeling approaches to develop an abundance index based on voyage and market data for a data-limited fishery

Lost in the woods: shifting habitats can lead phylogeography astray

Measurement errors in line transect surveys where detectability varies with distance and size.

The improbability of detecting trade-offs and some practical solutions

Evaluating trade-offs in spatial versus temporal replication when estimating avian community composition and predicting species distributions