Abstract:Background: Patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate were associated with different nasomaxillary complex from the normal population. Although the biomechanical effects of conventional rapid palatal expansion (Hyrax expansion) and bone-borne rapid palatal expansion (micro-implant-assisted expansion) in non-cleft patients have been identified by multiple studies, little is known in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the biomechanical effects of the conventional and bone-borne palatal expanders in a late adolescence with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Methods: A cone beam CT scan of a late adolescence with unilateral cleft lip and palate was selected to construct the three-dimensional finite element models of teeth and craniofacial structures. The models of conventional and born-borne palatal expanders were established to simulate the clinical maxillary expansion. The geometric nonlinear theory was applied to evaluate the Von Mises stress distribution and displacements in craniofacial structures and teeth. Results: Bone-borne palatal expander achieved more transverse movement than conventional palatal expander in the whole mount of craniofacial regions, and the maximum amount of expansion was occurred anteriorly along the alveolar ridge on cleft-side. The expanding force from born-borne palatal expander resulted in more advancement in nasomaxillary complex than it in conventional palatal expander, especially in the anterior area of the minor segment of maxilla. Stresses from the both expanders distributed in similar patterns, but larger magnitudes and ranges were generated using the bone-borne expander around the maxillary buttresses and pterygoid plates of sphenoid bone. The maximum expanding stresses from born-borne palatal expander were concentrated on palatal slope supporting minscrews, whereas those from conventional palatal expander were concentrated on the anchoring molars. In addition, the buccal tipping effect of teeth generated using the bone-borne expander was less than it using the conventional palatal expander. Conclusion: Bone-borne expander generated enhanced skeletal expansion at the levels of alveolar and palate in transversal direction, where the miniscrews contributed increased expanding forces to maxillary buttresses and decreased forces to buccal alveolar. Bone-borne expanders presented a superiority in correcting the asymmetric maxilla without surgical assistant in late adolescence with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Comparison of different maxillary advancement protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a finite element analysis

[Maxillary Protraction with and Without Maxillary Expansion on Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Model: a Finite Element Analysis].

Asymmetric Maxillary Protraction for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanics of craniofacial skeleton with cleft lip and palate on maxillary protraction: three-dimensional finite element analysis

The comparison of biomechanical effects of the conventional and bone-borne palatal expanders on late adolescence with unilateral cleft palate: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis

Evaluation of Treatment Protocols in Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion by Finite Element Analysis

Comparison of Short Implant, Angled Implant, Distal Extension and Grafting Methods for Atrophic Maxillary Posterior Region: a Finite Element Study

Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate.

Biomechanical Effects on Maxillary Protraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton with Cleft Lip and Palate after Alveolar Bone Graft.

[The Mechanical Force Analysis of Cleft Maxillary Three Dimensional Finite Element Models after Alveolar Bone Graft].

Comparative CBCT Analysis of Maxillofacial Skeletal Structures in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Individuals

Transverse Maxillary Development in Complete Cleft Patients: Comparison of 2 Treatment Strategies by Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Model Analysis

Comparison of Extramaxillary Anchored Implants, Tilted Implants, or Sinus Elevation Concepts on Stress Distribution in Atrophic Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis

Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of the Z-Shaped Position of Cleft lip on the Postoperative Appearance

Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients with and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: an Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study

The influence of palate scar force on the maxilla with unilateral cleft palate:A finite element model

[Mechanical Force Distribution on Cleft Maxillary Finite-Element Models after Alveolar and Hard Palate Bone Graft].

Three-dimensional Assessment of Longitudinal Surgical Outcome in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Modified Rotation Advancement Technique

Three-dimensional finite element analysis on stress distribution after different palatoplasty and levator veli palatini muscle reconstruction

[Effect of Maxillary Protraction in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Anterior Crossbite].

Evaluation of maxillary arch symmetry in cleft patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: a comparative study