Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the biomechanical effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial skeleton in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) after alveolar bone graft (ABG) and resorption of ABG, thus to provide theoretical basis for the clinical application of maxillary protraction, which can improve the facial deformity of the UCLP patients.METHODS:A finite element model of a UCLP patient's skull was generated using data from spiral computed tomographic (CT) scans. Based on this finite element model, another 6 ABG finite element models were constructed to simulate ABG and resorption of ABG, respectively (nonresorption model, upper one-third resorption of the grafted bone model, upper two-thirds resorption of the grafted bone model, lower one-third resorption of the grafted bone model, lower two-thirds resorption of the grafted bone model, upper one-third and lower one-third resorption of the grafted bone model). Two additional models were developed to simulate maxillary protraction with expansion and maxillary protraction alone. All models were loaded with orthopedic force (30 degrees downward and forward to the occlusal plane, 500 g per side) on the region of alveolar of maxillary canine.RESULTS:Before ABG, the cleft side showed larger displacement than the noncleft side, when it came to the stress distribution in the craniofacial suture, it showed an asymmetric pattern as well. After ABG, the displacement difference between the cleft side and the noncleft side decreased, and the stress distribution in the craniofacial suture showed more symmetric than that before ABG. The pterygopalatine suture obtained the largest value, followed by zygomaticotemporal, zygomaticomaxillary, and zygomaticofrontal sutures among the observed sutures. Higher stresses and pronounced forward displacement were generated in the craniofacial sutures after maxillary protraction with expansion.CONCLUSIONS:Maxillary protraction after ABG performed a more favorable outcome. Among the ABG models, nonresorption model showed the best effect after loading maxillary protraction force, and resorption in the lower region of the grafted bone showed a better effect than resorption in the upper region of the grafted bone. Maxillary expansion could effectively facilitate the orthopedic of the maxillary protraction presumably.

Influence of Maxillary Protraction on the Occlusal Condition of the Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with Anterior Crossbite

Application of three dimensional model in evaluating the effect of artificial bone implantation of hard cleft palate on the development of maxilla

[Effect of Maxillary Protraction in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Anterior Crossbite].

Effects of maxillary protraction in pre-pubertal patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

The Study of Maxillary Protraction Face Mask Combined with Orthodontics for Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Maxillary protraction effects on anterior crossbites. Repaired unilateral cleft versus noncleft prepubertal boys.

Biomechanics of craniofacial skeleton with cleft lip and palate on maxillary protraction: three-dimensional finite element analysis

Effects of the maxillary protraction on the upper pharyngeal widths in the patients of operated UCLP with anterior crossbite

Asymmetric Maxillary Protraction for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using Finite Element Analysis

Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients with and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: an Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study

Treatment effects of reverse-headgear in correction of severe skeletal anterior cross-bite in mixed dentition

The clinical observation of treatment in maxillary lip?opposite low canine with Physiologic Anchorage Control technique

[Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model of Maxillary Protraction of the Maxilla in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate].

Biomechanical Effects on Maxillary Protraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton with Cleft Lip and Palate after Alveolar Bone Graft.

[Maxillary Protraction with and Without Maxillary Expansion on Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Model: a Finite Element Analysis].

Mechanism of Class Ⅲ Elastics Treatment on Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with Crossbite

Electromyographic Investigation of Masticatory Muscles in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with Anterior Crossbite

A Primary Study on the Relationship Between Condyle Position and Anterior Distraction for Cross Bite Caused by Cleft Lip and Palate

Effects of Maxillary Protraction Therapy on the Pharyngeal Airway in Patients with Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Study.

Biomechanical Study on 3-Dimensional Finite Element Model of Maxillary Protraction and the Palate Expansion

Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Orthodontic Therapies with Variable Alveolar Bone Grafts under Occlusal Forces in Patient with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate