Abstract:Future fusion reactors like ITER and DEMO will have all-tungsten (W) walls and long pulses. These features will make wall conditioning more difficult than in most of the existing devices. The W Environment Steady-state Tokamak (WEST) is one of the few long pulse (364 s) fusion devices with actively cooled W plasma-facing components in the world. WEST is a unique test bed to study impurity migration and plasma density control via reactor relevant wall conditioning techniques. The phase II of WEST operations began in 2022, after the installation of a new lower divertor, now entirely equipped with actively cooled, ITER grade, W monoblocks. After pump down, we baked WEST between 90 °C and 170 °C for ∼2 weeks. After 82.5 h at 90 °C and 33 h at 170 °C, vacuum conditions were stable with a vessel pressure of 6x10 -5 Pa and mass spectra dominated by H 2 molecules. While at 170 °C, we performed ∼40 h of D 2 glow discharge cleaning (GDC) and ∼5 h of glow discharge boronization (GDB), using a 15 %-85 % B 2 D 6 -He mix and a total boron mass of ∼12 g. This was the very first GDB at such high temperature for WEST. The whole wall conditioning sequence led to a ∼10 times reduction of the H 2 O signal as well as to a ∼3 times reduction of the O 2 signal, according to mass spectra. Once back to 70 °C, the vessel pressure was 5.5x10 -6 Pa and plasma restart was seamless with ∼30 s cumulated over the very first 5 pulses and an Ohmic radiated power fraction F rad = 0.6, showing successful conditioning of the new ITER grade divertor. The effect of the first, 'hot' GDB faded with a characteristic cumulative injected energy of 2.45 GJ and saturation towards F rad ∼0.8. After 1.4 h and 7.5 GJ of cumulative plasma time and injected energy, we carried out a second GDB, this time at 70 °C. This 'cold' GDB initially led to a much lower Ohmic F rad = 0.3–0.4 but the effect lasted ∼7 times less, with a characteristic cumulative injected energy of 0.37 GJ. At the end of the campaign, we cumulated ∼3h and ∼30 GJ through repetitive, minute long pulses without any boronization. Throughout this 4-weeks-long experiment, F rad in the 4 MW heating phase evolved only marginally (from 0.5 to 0.55). This increase is mostly due to the build-up of re/co-deposited layers on both lower divertor targets.

Improved Confinement in JET High {beta} Plasmas with an ITER-Like Wall

Overview of Hl-2a Experiment Results

Overview of Experimental Results on the HL-2A Tokamak

OV / 4-3 1 Overview of Experimental Results on HL-2 A

OV / 4-5 1 Overview of Experimental Results on the HL-2 A Tokamak

Design, manufacture and initial operation of the beryllium components of the JET ITER-like wall

New plasma regimes with small ELMs and high confinement at the Joint European Torus

Direct gyrokinetic comparison of pedestal transport in JET with carbon and ITER-like walls

Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow of a Non-Equilibrium Argon Plasma Jet with Confined Wall

Overview of tritium retention in divertor tiles and dust particles from the JET tokamak with the ITER-LIKE WALL

Experimental estimation of tungsten impurity sputtering due to Type I ELMs in JET-ITER-like wall using pedestal electron cyclotron emission and target Langmuir probe measurements

ICRH-related impurity source and control across experiments in H, D, T plasmas at JET-ILW

Overview of T and D-T results in JET with ITER-like Wall

Impurity behaviour in JET high-current baseline scenario for Deuterium, Tritium and Deuterium-Tritium plasmas

Modelling of plasma facing component erosion, impurity migration, dust transport and melting processes at JET-ILW

Confinement and Heating of a Deuterium-Tritium Plasma

Recent progress in L-H transition studies at JET: Tritium, Helium, Hydrogen and Deuterium

Changeover between helium and hydrogen fueled plasmas in JET and WEST

Effect of impurities on the transition between minority ion and mode conversion ICRH heating in (3He)-H tokamak plasmas

Wall conditions in WEST during operations with a new ITER grade, actively cooled divertor

Impact of nuclear heating distribution on the structural behavior of ITER first wall panel 11