Abstract:Quantifying and comparing the scientific output of researchers has become critical for governments, funding agencies and universities. Comparison by reputation and direct assessment of contributions to the field is no longer possible, as the number of scientists increases and traditional definitions about scientific fields become blurred. The h-index is often used for comparing scientists, but has several well-documented shortcomings. In this paper, we introduce a new index for measuring and comparing the publication records of scientists: the pagerank-index (symbolised as π). The index uses a version of pagerank algorithm and the citation networks of papers in its computation, and is fundamentally different from the existing variants of h-index because it considers not only the number of citations but also the actual impact of each citation. We adapt two approaches to demonstrate the utility of the new index. Firstly, we use a simulation model of a community of authors, whereby we create various 'groups' of authors which are different from each other in inherent publication habits, to show that the pagerank-index is fairer than the existing indices in three distinct scenarios: (i) when authors try to 'massage' their index by publishing papers in low-quality outlets primarily to self-cite other papers (ii) when authors collaborate in large groups in order to obtain more authorships (iii) when authors spend most of their time in producing genuine but low quality publications that would massage their index. Secondly, we undertake two real world case studies: (i) the evolving author community of quantum game theory, as defined by Google Scholar (ii) a snapshot of the high energy physics (HEP) theory research community in arXiv. In both case studies, we find that the list of top authors vary very significantly when h-index and pagerank-index are used for comparison. We show that in both cases, authors who have collaborated in large groups and/or published less impactful papers tend to be comparatively favoured by the h-index, whereas the pagerank-index highlights authors who have made a relatively small number of definitive contributions, or written papers which served to highlight the link between diverse disciplines, or typically worked in smaller groups. Thus, we argue that the pagerank-index is an inherently fairer and more nuanced metric to quantify the publication records of scientists compared to existing measures.

H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments

Quantitative analysis of automatic performance evaluation systems based on the h-index

Robust h-index

Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks

In Those Fields Where Multiple Authorship Is The Rule, The H-Index Should Be Supplemented By Role-Based H-Indices

Does the $h_α$ index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R

Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting

The H-index Paradox: Your Coauthors Have a Higher H-index than You Do

Modifying H-Index by Allocating Credit of Multi-Authored Papers Whose Author Names Rank Based on Contribution

Two fast algorithms for computation of h-index

The i100-index, i1000-index and i10,000-index: expansion and fortification of the Google Scholar h-index for finer-scale citation descriptions and researcher classification

Some Generalized Integrals Applied in Scientometrics and Related Evaluation

An Efficient Adaptive Degree-Based Heuristic Algorithm for Influence Maximization in Hypergraphs

Analysis of effects to scientific impact indicators based on the coevolution of coauthorship and citation networks

A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators

Analyzing research performance: proposition of a new complementary index

Exploiting citation networks for large-scale author name disambiguation

Crediting multi-authored papers to single authors

The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers

The H’-Index, Effectively Improving the H-Index Based on the Citation Distribution

Mutual Influence in Citation and Cooperation Patterns