Abstract:Rather than "measuring" a scientist impact through the number of citations which his/her published work can have generated, isn't it more appropriate to consider his/her value through his/her scientific network performance illustrated by his/her co-author role, thus focussing on his/her joint publications, - and their impact through citations? Whence, on one hand, this paper very briefly examines bibliometric laws, like the $h$-index and subsequent debate about co-authorship effects, but on the other hand, proposes a measure of collaborative work through a new index. Based on data about the publication output of a specific research group, a new bibliometric law is found. Let a co-author $C$ have written $J$ (joint) publications with one or several colleagues. Rank all the co-authors of that individual according to their number of joint publications, giving a rank $r$ to each co-author, starting with $r=1$ for the most prolific. It is empirically found that a very simple relationship holds between the number of joint publications $J$ by coauthors and their rank of importance, i.e. $J \propto 1/r$. Thereafter, in the same spirit as for the Hirsch core, one can define a "co-author core", and introduce indices operating on an author. It is emphasized that the new index has a quite different (philosophical) perspective that the $h$-index. In the present case, one focusses on "relevant" persons rather than on "relevant" publications. Although the numerical discussion is based on one case, there is little doubt that the law can be verified in many other situations. Therefore, variants and generalizations could be later produced in order to quantify co-author roles, in a temporary or long lasting stable team(s), and lead to criteria about funding, career measurements or even induce career strategies.

The H-index Paradox: Your Coauthors Have a Higher H-index than You Do

A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking. The co-author core

The Enmity Paradox

Strong Friendship Paradox in Social Networks

The inconsistency of the h-index

Friendship Paradox Redux: Your Friends Are More Interesting Than You

On the meaning of the h-index

The Friendship Paradox and Social Network Participation

Revisiting the Feld’s Friendship Paradox in Online Social Networks

A Case Study of the Modified Hirsch Index hm Accounting for Multiple Co-authors

Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research

The friendship paradox in scale-free networks

The inconsistency of h-index: a mathematical analysis

Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks

Comparative Study on H-index Correlative Factors of Journal Papers Published by University Library

Asymmetry of social interactions and its role in link predictability: the case of coauthorship networks

In Those Fields Where Multiple Authorship Is The Rule, The H-Index Should Be Supplemented By Role-Based H-Indices

Hyperauthored papers disproportionately amplify important egocentric network metrics

H-Index Manipulation by Merging Articles: Models, Theory, and Experiments

Quantitative analysis of automatic performance evaluation systems based on the h-index

The Paradox of Second-Order Homophily in Networks