Abstract:Dual-process approaches of decision-making examine the interaction between affective/intuitive and deliberative processes underlying value judgment. From this perspective, decisions are supported by a combination of relatively explicit capabilities for abstract reasoning and relatively implicit evolved domain-general as well as learned domain-specific affective responses. One such approach, the somatic markers hypothesis (SMH), expresses these implicit processes as a system of evolved primary emotions supplemented by associations between affect and experience that accrue over lifetime, or somatic markers. In this view, somatic markers are useful only if their local capability to predict the value of an action is above a baseline equal to the predictive capability of the combined rational and primary emotional subsystems. We argue that decision-making has often been conceived of as a linear process: the effect of decision sequences is additive, local utility is cumulative, and there is no strong environmental feedback. This widespread assumption can have consequences for answering questions regarding the relative weight between the systems and their interaction within a cognitive architecture. We introduce a mathematical formalization of the SMH and study it in situations of dynamic, non-linear decision chains using a discrete-time stochastic model. We find, contrary to expectations, that decision-making events can interact non-additively with the environment in apparently paradoxical ways. We find that in non-lethal situations, primary emotions are represented globally over and above their local weight, showing a tendency for overcautiousness in situated decision chains. We also show that because they tend to counteract this trend, poorly attuned somatic markers that by themselves do not locally enhance decision-making, can still produce an overall positive effect. This result has developmental and evolutionary implications since, by promoting exploratory behavior, somatic markers would seem to be beneficial even at early stages when experiential attunement is poor. Although the model is formulated in terms of the SMH, the implications apply to dual systems theories in general since it makes minimal assumptions about the nature of the processes involved.

Some comparisons between the Variational rationality, Habitual domain, and DMCS approaches

Variational Analysis in Psychological Modeling

Variational principles in models of behavioral sciences

Synergizing habits and goals with variational Bayes

The parallelism of cognitive economy and physiological economy: A rationality-based dual process theory

Rationality in current era -- A recent survey

Habits and Goals in Synergy: a Variational Bayesian Framework for Behavior

Behavioral Decision Makings: Reconciling Behavioral Economics and Decision Systems

Embodied sequential sampling models and dynamic neural fields for decision-making: Why hesitate between two when a continuum is the answer

Humans rationally balance detailed and temporally abstract world models

Modeling Human Behavior Part II -- Cognitive approaches and Uncertainty

Uncertainty quantification and exploration-exploitation trade-off in humans

Unifying Decision-Making: A Review on Evolutionary Theories on Rationality and Cognitive Biases

Simulation in discrete choice models evaluation: SDCM, a simulation tool for performance evaluation of DCMs

Ramifications of behavioural complexity for habit conceptualisation, promotion, and measurement

Information Theory for Agents in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and Economics

Unreliable Gut Feelings Can Lead to Correct Decisions: The Somatic Marker Hypothesis in Non-Linear Decision Chains

The Perfect Marriage and Much More: Combining Dimension Reduction, Distance Measures and Covariance

The Functional Convergence and Heterogeneity of Social, Episodic, and Self-Referential Thought in the Default Mode Network

Dynamically Consistent Objective and Subjective Rationality

Decision-making Under Ordinal Preferences and Comparative Uncertainty