Abstract:Learning to make adaptive decisions involves making choices, assessing their consequence, and leveraging this assessment to attain higher rewarding states. Despite vast literature on value-based decision-making, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying decisions in highly uncertain contexts. Real world decisions are rarely accompanied by immediate feedback, explicit rewards, or complete knowledge of the environment. Being able to make informed decisions in such contexts requires significant knowledge about the environment, which can only be gained via exploration. Here we aim at understanding and formalizing the brain mechanisms underlying these processes. To this end, we first designed and performed an experimental task. Human participants had to learn to maximize reward while making sequences of decisions with only basic knowledge of the environment, and in the absence of explicit performance cues. Participants had to rely on their own internal assessment of performance to reveal a covert relationship between their choices and their subsequent consequences to find a strategy leading to the highest cumulative reward. Our results show that the participants' reaction times were longer whenever the decision involved a future consequence, suggesting greater introspection whenever a delayed value had to be considered. The learning time varied significantly across participants. Second, we formalized the neurocognitive processes underlying decision-making within this task, combining mean-field representations of competing neural populations with a reinforcement learning mechanism. This model provided a plausible characterization of the brain dynamics underlying these processes, and reproduced each aspect of the participants' behavior, from their reaction times and choices to their learning rates. In summary, both the experimental results and the model provide a principled explanation to how delayed value may be computed and incorporated into the neural dynamics of decision-making, and to how learning occurs in these uncertain scenarios.

Uncertainty quantification and exploration-exploitation trade-off in humans

Gamifying optimization: a Wasserstein distance-based analysis of human search

Mastering the exploration-exploitation trade-off in Bayesian Optimization

Multiple and subject-specific roles of uncertainty in reward-guided decision-making

Learning and choosing in an uncertain world: An investigation of the explore-exploit dilemma in static and dynamic environments

Humans adaptively resolve the explore-exploit dilemma under cognitive constraints: Evidence from a multi-armed bandit task

A unified uncertainty-aware exploration: Combining epistemic and aleatory uncertainty

A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty

Balancing safety and efficiency in human decision making

Expert-guided Bayesian Optimisation for Human-in-the-loop Experimental Design of Known Systems

A Behavioral Model for Exploration vs. Exploitation: Theoretical Framework and Experimental Evidence

Dealing with uncertainty: Balancing exploration and exploitation in deep recurrent reinforcement learning

Cognitive mechanisms of learning in sequential decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental and theoretical approach

The Uncertainty Bellman Equation and Exploration

Adaptive Integration of Perceptual and Reward Information in an Uncertain World

Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Beyond Probabilities

The Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma Revisited: An Entropy Perspective

Using AI Uncertainty Quantification to Improve Human Decision-Making

Integrating Human Expertise in Continuous Spaces: A Novel Interactive Bayesian Optimization Framework with Preference Expected Improvement

Computational mechanisms of curiosity and goal-directed exploration