Abstract:Discussions about unilateral trade measures as a means to combat climate change have become quite fashionable notwithstanding warnings against unilateralism and protectionism from the leaders of G-8 and G-20 in times of an economic crisis. A system of ‘border tax adjustment’ on imports is suggested in order to countervail the cost of domestic emission trading systems. The proponents argue that without such measures, a country having adopted an emission trading system would not only lose economically but also environmentally. The standard reason given to justify this argument is the notion of carbon leakage, namely, the danger that energy-intensive production would move from countries with domestic policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions based on a carbon price for emitters to regions that do not have a binding and costly regulatory CO2 regime. Recently, the discussions have been fuelled by the Waxman/Markey Bill, adopted on 26 June 2009 by the House of Representatives and by a French non-paper, presented at the informal EU Environment Council held in July 2009. These two initiatives aim to establish, in the context of a domestic emission trading system, a system of ‘border tax adjustment’ against some imports from some countries, namely, those that are seen as not contributing enough in the fight against climate change. The revised European ETS Directive does not provide for border measures. It instructs the European Commission to submit a report to the Council and the European Parliament no later than 30 June 2010 assessing whether energy-intensive sectors are exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage and explicitly outlines the inclusion of imports in the European Union’s ETS system as one of several actions. The joint WTO-UNEP paper on trade and climate change has been widely regarded as a justification from a legal point of view of such measures. While there are many proponents for such measures, there remains a considerable amount of skepticism; politicians, business organizations, and scholars have warned against such an approach. The following short note will discuss the feasibility of ‘border tax adjustment’ in relation to domestic climate change legislation as well as some WTO legal aspects along the following questions: (1) Are there target countries for border measures? (2) Would border measures help to combat climate change and could they be administered without too much bureaucracy? (3) How should border measures be qualified under General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)?

A modified GHG intensity indicator: Toward a sustainable global economy based on a carbon border tax and emissions trading

IIGHGINT: A generalization to the modified GHG intensity universal indicator toward a production/consumption insensitive border carbon tax

A Cross-Country Study of Carbon Footprint Using MRIO Model

Study on the Impact of Green GDP Accounting System on Climate - Based on Integrated Evaluation and Markov Modelling

Planetary good governance after the Paris Agreement: The case for a global greenhouse gas tax

Greener economic development via carbon taxation scheme optimization

Environmental tax reform and double dividend evidence

Is there a case for carbon-based border tax adjustment? An applied general equilibrium analysis

Border Tax Adjustment to Combat Carbon Leakage: A Myth

Carbon mitigation by quota allocation

Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost

Toward low‐carbon emissions and green growth for sustainable development in emerging economies: Do green trade openness, eco‐innovation, and carbon price matter?

Allocation of global temperature change to consumers

A carbon emissions reduction index: Integrating the volume and allocation of regional emissions

An Economic Analysis of Consumption and Carbon Emission Responsibility

How developing countries can engage in GHG reduction: a case study for China

Analysis of Carbon Emission Intensity As the Main Index for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation Commitments

The Green-Innovation-Inducing Effect of a Unit Progressive Carbon Tax

Taxing energy to tackle greenhouse gases: evaluating the role of financial risk in high-income economies

Climate negotiations: Tie carbon emissions to consumers.

Re-analyzing the Economic Impact of a Global Bunker Emissions Charge