Is burden responsibility more effective? A value-added method for tracing worldwide carbon emissions
Xueliu Xu,Qian Wang,Chenyang Ran,Mingjie Mu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106889
IF: 6.536
2021-03-01
Ecological Economics
Abstract:<p>This paper takes both value-added trade and trade-implied CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction responsibility into account, which constructs a unified conceptual framework to recalculate CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction responsibility from the perspective of value-added trade. This allows policymakers to trace worldwide CO<sub>2</sub> emissions at multiple levels of trade, production, consumption, and shared principle alongside the world trade network. This paper employs the gross export decomposition methodology and the World Input-Output Database for calculations. Firstly, compared with traditional trade statistics, measuring embedded emissions in value-added trade can deduct the double-counted terms of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions due to intermediate products crossing several borders repeatedly. Secondly, the worldwide inter-country CO<sub>2</sub> emission footprints embedded in exports, imports, and net flows of value-added trade are traced in a geographical world map. It occurs that, China, the USA, Russia, and the EU are the top four largest emitters. Thirdly, network analysis is further utilized to capture bilateral implicit CO<sub>2</sub> emission relationships, e.g., the EU members' environmental impacts depend on intra-regional trade within the union. Finally, a comparison is made under three burden-sharing principles based on value-added trade. The shared responsibility offers a compromise between the producer's and the consumer's principle, which is considered to be fairer and more effective.</p>
economics,environmental studies,environmental sciences,ecology